0001茅野愛衣2017/12/05(火) 12:17:33.15 「￣￣了 l h「￢丨 ＜日本語くらいわかれよアニ豚声豚基地外屑ニートのID:RH7HOye50
／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿ ／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ / ／∧ / / /.i l iー――‐u'￣ ./ ／ Д｀ / / / / l l i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ' l l . / _/ ＼ !、 lヽ＿＿＿_」 l . !、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./ ﾄ、＿_＼/ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y l l ￣( ）y ） /l i l l Y''/ー' / .l l !、 l l./ / l l / / l/ ,/ i' /_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」 L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」 `ー' `ヽ＿」
0002Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:26:38.43ID:hfq2qISDhttp://hissi.org/read.php/livemarket1/20171205/Ukg3SE95ZTUw.html 日経225先物オプション実況スレ29329 2 ：山師さん＠トレード中[sage]：2017/12/05(火) 01:18:26.05 ID:RH7HOye50 >>1=いじめられっ子酢豚のスレかｗ 日経225先物オプション実況スレ29331 4 ：山師さん＠トレード中[sage]：2017/12/05(火) 06:00:45.36 ID:RH7HOye50 まだ起きてやがるｗ 0003Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:42:28.12ID:8TIB9iEb UK and EU fail to strike Brexit talks deal
The UK and EU have failed to reach an agreement to move to the next stage of Brexit talks, Theresa May has said. The prime minister said talks would reconvene "before the end of the week" and she was "confident we will conclude this positively". The talks are understood to have broken down after the Democratic Unionist Party refused to accept concessions on the Irish border issue. Downing Street said that was not the only outstanding problem. Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a deal had been done, but the UK appeared to change its mind over the Irish border question after pressure from the DUP. ADVERTISEMENT
"I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he told a press conference in Dublin. Ireland 'disappointed' at no deal on Brexit Kuenssberg: What on earth happened? What will happen to EU citizens in the UK? Sturgeon calls for 'special' Brexit deals Northern Ireland's DUP has 10 MPs at Westminster, and their support is vital to the government. This is because the Conservatives are without a Commons majority since June's general election, and rely on a deal with the DUP to ensure they can survive key votes. How the talks broke down Mrs May is understood to have broken off from talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker to speak to DUP leader Arlene Foster. The UK had reportedly been prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name. But Mrs Foster then said her party "will not accept any form of regulatory divergence" that separates Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. "During the call it was made plain to the PM that the DUP had significant concerns about the deal being discussed that gave concessions to the Dublin government," said the BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg. "I understand Mrs Foster told Theresa May that she would not be able to support such a deal. "It's been suggested too that there are 20 or so Conservative MPs who had serious misgivings about the compromises that were understood to be on the table."
Why is the DUP unhappy about the plan?
DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party would not accept any Brexit deal that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. Her party's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson claimed Brussels has been trying to "bounce the prime minister into acceding to the shape of a deal they want" and many of her own backbenchers would not accept it. He said the DUP objected to the form of words used in a draft document, which he said referred to "regulatory alignment" and "no regulatory divergence" between Northern Ireland and the EU. Both phrases were "simply EU speak for keeping Northern Ireland in the European market" and "in effect, part of the United Kingdom would be kept within the single market," he said. Asked if the DUP would pull out of the confidence and supply agreement they have with the Conservative government in Westminster over this issue, he said: "I think that her (Theresa May) problem isn't going to be just with the DUP". 0004Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:42:56.82ID:8TIB9iEb The Irish prime minister's position
Leo Varadkar says he wants a written guarantee that there will be no return to a "hard border" between the Republic and Northern Ireland - and this is what he thought he had got. "I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he said. "I accept that the prime minister has asked for more time and I know that she faces many challenges, and I acknowledge that she is negotiating in good faith. "But my position and that of the Irish government is unequivocal: Ireland wants to proceed to phase two. "However, we cannot agree to do this unless we have firm guarantees that there will not be a hard border in Ireland under any circumstances." He said it was important to listen to the DUP, but also to bear in mind the position of other parties in Northern Ireland - and it should not be forgotten that the majority in Northern Ireland voted to remain in the EU.
What did Theresa May say?
Speaking at a joint press conference in Brussels with Mr Juncker, Mrs May said: "We have been negotiating hard. And a lot of progress has been made. And on many of the issues there is a common understanding. "And it is clear, crucially, that we want to move forward together. "But on a couple of issues some differences do remain which require further negotiation and consultation."
What did Jean-Claude Juncker say?
The European Commission President said "it was not possible to reach complete agreement today" despite their "best efforts". But he added: "I have to say that we were narrowing our positions to a huge extent today, thanks to the British prime minister, thanks to the willingness of the European Commission to have a fair deal with Britain. "I'm still confident that we can reach sufficient progress before the European Council of 15 December. "This is not a failure, this is the start of the very last round. "I'm very confident that we will reach an agreement in the course of this week." 0005Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:43:27.42ID:8TIB9iEb UK political reaction
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "The real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election." He added that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom". Conservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government. Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together, and the mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy". Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party. The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added. Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe. The people of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit." Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Northern Ireland was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
Where the talks are at The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress" has been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border. The UK has been set a deadline of this week to come forward with an improved offer on them, and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December. On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn). Reality Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill? On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status. Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport. Settled status will grant those who have spent five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens. Ministers have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence". Brexit: All you need to know 0006Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:43:51.02ID:8TIB9iEb Trump travel ban: Supreme Court lets restrictions take full effect
The US Supreme Court has ruled President Donald Trump's travel ban on six mainly Muslim countries can go fully into effect. But the directive against travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen still faces legal challenges. The ruling covers the third version of the directive that President Trump has issued since taking office. On Monday, seven of the nine justices lifted injunctions imposed by lower courts on the policy. Only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have allowed the president's order to remain blocked.
Federal appeals courts in San Francisco, California, and Richmond, Virginia, will hear arguments this week on whether the latest iteration of the policy is lawful. Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news". But she added: "It's important to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today." "The fight continues."
How have Trump travel bans fared? The president's travel bans have each been frustrated by the courts to some degree: In January, he signed an order banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry. The measure, which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens. By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US, but granted a wide exemption for those with a "bona fide connection" to the US President Trump's third order was announced in late September. It added non-Muslim-majority nations North Korea and Venezuela, provisions which lower courts have allowed to proceed
What have lower courts said? In striking it down, federal judges have cited Mr Trump's campaign description of his policy as a "Muslim ban" and his call for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States". Lower courts have also found the president's policy violated the first amendment of the US constitution covering freedom of religion. In October, a Maryland federal judge said: "The 'initial' announcement of the Muslim ban, offered repeatedly and explicitly through President Trump's own statements, forcefully and persuasively expressed his purpose in unequivocal terms." A federal judge in Hawaii said the administration "lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'". A court in Virginia ruled: "The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable. The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed, " the court ruling said, pointing out that the countries' populations were between 90% and 99% Muslim. 0007Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:44:15.29ID:8TIB9iEb Yemen's former leader, Ali Abdullah Salehha killed in Saousa
Former Yemen President Aria Abdullah Sale was murdered in the fight against supporters and former alliance Hautei revolt movement. Officials of the People 's Congress of President Saleh said he died in an attack in the southern part of the capital Sana'a. Houthis' leaders welcomed this news as a "very important opportunity". Mr. Abdul Marik Al-Hawk said that he dismissed the "conspiracy" by the Saudi leader-led coalition government backing the government that had made peace negotiations with President Saleh. Meanwhile, the UN said the air strikes of Sana intensified and the battle spread to other administrations like Haja. According to a report of the UN Humanitarian Affairs Adjustment Office, the road was closed and tanks were on the street. Some of the most intense battles were in diplomatic areas near the UN forces.
After the death of Sareha, the future of Yemen is terrible The Red Cross presumed that at least 125 people were killed and more than 230 people were injured as a riot occurred on Friday. United Nations humanitarian affairs coordinator Jamie McGoldrick asked civilians to leave their homes on 5 December to seek assistance and call for humanitarian stops for rescue workers to continue their life-saving program. "They do not know what will come next ... children and young people - that is terribly sad" to the BBC. "For us it is in a situation where we can not help them because we are bound in the same way and we do not have the ability to respond to their needs in the way we need them. Ali Abdullah Saleh, the dominant power of Yemen Yemen's conflict: Who is fighting with whom?
How did the rebel army civil war start? Until recently, supporters of Salea were fighting side by side with Houthis in the fight against the present President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi. But on Wednesday the conflict over Sanna's largest mosque control resulted in an armed conflict where more than 125 people died. President Sarer suggested to "create a new page" with the coalition government led by Saudi Arabia, when he stopped blocking Yemen 's attacks and stopped blocking countries in Saturday. Houthis condemned the "coup d'etat" against "an alliance he never believed". How did Sale die? By Sunday, Houthi's combatants dominated many of the capital, intense fights were taking place around Saleh's family and its allied houses. Mr. Salare's home rioted Monday morning because the bombing of the ruling coalition leader led by Saudi did not stop Hautis. Soon thereafter, reports began to appear that he was killed.
A video circulated on social media showing a man's body resembling Mr. Sareha who has a severe head injury. That is, armed men came on a blanket shouting ."Please praise God." And "a little ant 's affash!" - the name of Mr. Saleh' s clan. After that, officials of the People's Congress confirmed Sale's death. They said that the escort group, where he and the other officials were in, received the firing of Houshi fighter, escaping from the south towards Sahan, the hometown of the prolums leader. According to some reports, he was stopped by the RPG rocket and was temporarily killed and then removed from his car. What was the reaction to the news? Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi celebrated what he called "the Day of the Collapse of Rebellious Conspiracy." He also insisted that Houthis "has no problem" with GPC or its members. But unknown GPC officials said to the Al Arabiya TV owned by Saudi that the Yemenians "should go to the street and face Haute's militia". 0008Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:45:35.13ID:8TIB9iEb This is because the Conservatives are without a Commons majority since June's general election, and rely on a deal with the DUP to ensure they can survive key votes. How the talks broke down Mrs May is understood to have broken off from talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker to speak to DUP leader Arlene Foster. The UK had reportedly been prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name. But Mrs Foster then said her party "will not accept any form of regulatory divergence" that separates Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. "During the call it was made plain to the PM that the DUP had significant concerns about the deal being discussed that gave concessions to the Dublin government," said the BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg. "I understand Mrs Foster told Theresa May that she would not be able to support such a deal. "It's been suggested too that there are 20 or so Conservative MPs who had serious misgivings about the compromises that were understood to be on the table."
UK and EU fail to strike Brexit talks deal
The UK and EU have failed to reach an agreement to move to the next stage of Brexit talks, Theresa May has said. The prime minister said talks would reconvene "before the end of the week" and she was "confident we will conclude this positively". The talks are understood to have broken down after the Democratic Unionist Party refused to accept concessions on the Irish border issue. Downing Street said that was not the only outstanding problem. Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a deal had been done, but the UK appeared to change its mind over the Irish border question after pressure from the DUP. ADVERTISEMENT
"I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he told a press conference in Dublin. Ireland 'disappointed' at no deal on Brexit Kuenssberg: What on earth happened? What will happen to EU citizens in the UK? Sturgeon calls for 'special' Brexit deals Northern Ireland's DUP has 10 MPs at Westminster, and their support is vital to the government.
Why is the DUP unhappy about the plan?
DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party would not accept any Brexit deal that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. Her party's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson claimed Brussels has been trying to "bounce the prime minister into acceding to the shape of a deal they want" and many of her own backbenchers would not accept it. He said the DUP objected to the form of words used in a draft document, which he said referred to "regulatory alignment" and "no regulatory divergence" between Northern Ireland and the EU. Both phrases were "simply EU speak for keeping Northern Ireland in the European market" and "in effect, part of the United Kingdom would be kept within the single market," he said. Asked if the DUP would pull out of the confidence and supply agreement they have with the Conservative government in Westminster over this issue, he said: "I think that her (Theresa May) problem isn't going to be just with the DUP". 0009Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 12:46:44.80ID:8TIB9iEb ＿＿＿＿ .／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ ./-┤ ｡ |｡ |――-､ ヽ | ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ | The US Supreme Court has ruled President Donald Trump's travel ban on six mainly Muslim countries can go fully into effect. But the directive against travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen still faces legal challenges. The ruling covers the third version of the directive that President Trump has issued since taking office. On Monday, seven of the nine justices lifted injunctions imposed by lower courts on the policy. Only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have allowed the president's order to remain blocked.
| - | ― | | | ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ ∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼ | ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣ ￣￣ ノノ ＼ How have Trump travel bans fared? The president's travel bans have each been frustrated by the courts to some degree: In January, he signed an order banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry. The measure, which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens. By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US, but granted a wide exemption for those with a "bona fide connection" to the US President Trump's third order was announced in late September. It added non-Muslim-majority nations North Korea and Venezuela, provisions which lower courts have allowed to proceed
Federal appeals courts in San Francisco, California, and Richmond, Virginia, will hear arguments this week on whether the latest iteration of the policy is lawful. Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news". But she added: "It's important to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today." "The fight continues."
What have lower courts said? In striking it down, federal judges have cited Mr Trump's campaign description of his policy as a "Muslim ban" and his call for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States". Lower courts have also found the president's policy violated the first amendment of the US constitution covering freedom of religion. In October, a Maryland federal judge said: "The 'initial' announcement of the Muslim ban, offered repeatedly and explicitly through President Trump's own statements, forcefully and persuasively expressed his purpose in unequivocal terms." A federal judge in Hawaii said the administration "lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'". A court in Virginia ruled: "The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable. The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed, " the court ruling said, pointing out that the countries' populations were between 90% and 99% Muslim. 0010Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:30:59.26ID:GELm5qV1 次スレあげ 0011Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:31:18.03ID:/PRHTn/P うんこ食べたろう 0012Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:31:41.70ID:8TIB9iEb ヽヽ ヽヽ ヽヽ ヽヽ ──┐. | | ──┐. | | ──┐. | | ──┐. | | / | | / | | / | | / | | ───── ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ ┴ ┴ ┴ ＼(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ／ ／⌒ヽ ／⌒ヽ. ／⌒ヽ. ／⌒ヽ ／⌒ヽ (＾ω＾ ） ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) ／|￣￣::ヽ;ヽ￣￣￣:.ヽ:.;￣￣￣ヾヽ;.:￣￣￣ヽヾ￣￣￣￣ヾヾ￣￣￣ ／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿 ／ |":●;:゛∵●;●;:●;:゛∵●;:;:゛∵●:●:●゛∵;,":●; ":●;":●;●;:●;:' ( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／ |:●;":●;":●;":●;":''`゛:;●;:●／⌒ヽ ●:●:●゛∵;,":●●●''`●;":●;" ／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵:●;:●;":●;":●;":●;":゛:;●;:●;( ＾ω＾)こっちにデカイうんちがあるお！i●;●、●''` ( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ;,、`●;．'';,,:●;":''`゛∵●;:●●''`●ノつ,:゛●;;:●;.／⌒ヽ;:本当かお！●;:'':●"''`:●゛:●;" ／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,、":●; 。 ''`゛∵;,":●; ":●●;'`●●,;:;";i●;;.;:'(＾ω＾ )⌒ヽノ';●:●:●゛∵;,":●●''` ( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ":●;;,、`●''●;:／⌒ヽ ● :●;;,, :●●;.●;:,:.;:●;●..:⊂⊂ ととノ,:.;●''`●":●;●:●:●゛∵; ／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,、'':●:●;:。● (＾ω＾ ):.／⌒ヽ●;:●:●●''`● ,;:・゛∵●;:●;●.,●,.／⌒ヽ;:●;: ）:●;;,, ( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ;,、`●;．●''`●;:●;ノつ●●(＾ω＾ )⌒ヽノ''`●:●;:''":●;;,, ●;:●;:''" と(＾ω＾ )つ,_,,_)つ:●;;,, ／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,":●;、 ●;:●;:●;'`●●,;:;"; ⊂⊂ ととノ,;:;●''`●;:●;:''":●;;,, :●;,●:●●幸せだお～''`●;●;;,, ( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／ `；":●;ヾ;,、`●''`●;:●;:''":●;;,●、●''`●うんこウマスｗｗｗ;:●:●●''`●;:''":, ●;．":●;":●;'';,,●''`●;:'' (ノU " し ｀J ;'・ミ∵":●;;,、":●;。 ;,●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''": ／`；ヾ;,、`●;．":●;'":●;';,,":●●、●''`●;:●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●:●●''`●;:''":●●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":● ／":●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;、●''`●;:●:●、●''`●;:●:●`●;:' ￣￣| 0013Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:31:44.40ID:GELm5qV1 この荒らしている人だれ？ 0014Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:32:06.35ID:k10VYeMi 動かな過ぎお出かけ不可避 0015Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:32:44.17ID:ma8fEV7/>>12 なんだよこれｗ 0016Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:33:10.91ID:1VC07YqC>>1 考えたら---社畜も専業も、、、みんな--政府に毟り取られてるんだなぁぁ・・・
税金-20％--一律。。。。ｗｗっｗ．。。。億トレも-20％--オレも・・・
なんか不公平やなぁぁ・・・・・ああああああああ 0017Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:34:00.99ID:leqYHVR9 死と税金からは逃げられない 0018Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:34:33.09ID:FQnYEhNy サイボーグになりたい 0019Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:35:08.11ID:8TIB9iEb (i) Identity-management information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide the information need ed to determine >>13
whether individuals seeking benefits under the immigration laws ar e who they claim to be. The identity-management information category focuses on the integrity of documents required>>14
for travel to the United States. The criteria asses sed in this category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedde d with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen passports to appropriate entities, and makes available upon request identity-related information not included in its passports.
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide information about whether persons who seek entry to this country pose national security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed i>>15 n this category include whether the country makes available, d irectly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and criminal-history information upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the countr y impedes the United States Government's receipt of information about passengers and crew traveling to the United States.
(iii) National security and public-safety risk assessment. The national security and public-safety risk assessment category f ent of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Department of State, collected data on the performance of all foreign governments and assessed each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. The assessment focused, in particular, on identity management, security and public-safety threats, and national security risks. Through this assessment, the agencies measured each country' s performance with respect to issuing reliable travel documents a nd implementing adequate identity-management and information-sharing protocols and procedures, and evaluated terrorism-relate d and public-safety risks associated with foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States from each country. >>16
(e) The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this sectio (g) The Secretary of Homeland Security assesses that the following countries continue to have " inadequate" identity-management protocols, information-sharing pra ctices, and risk factors, with respect to the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section, such that entry restrictions and limitations are recommended: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The Secretary of Homeland Security also assesses that Iraq did not meet the
baseline, but that entry restrictions and limitations under a President ial proclamation are not warranted. The Secretary of Homeland Security recommend s, however, that nationals of Iraq who seek to enter the United States be s>>17
ubject to additional scrutiny to determine if they pose risks to the national security o r public safety of the United States. In reaching these conclusions, the Secr etary of Homeland Security considered the close cooperative relationship between the United States and the democratically elected government of Iraq, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of Un ited States forces in Iraq, and Iraq's commitment to combating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). 0020Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:35:11.44ID:Hx1xyZYE 利益20万以下だから税金は申告しない予定(´・ω・`) 0021Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:35:17.07ID:XsOWI5WM 荒らすんじゃねぇぞ… 0022Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:35:22.79ID:Dzmsdtwg>>13 窓埋厨 0023Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:35:29.68ID:KpZlyjQH>>16 そこで安倍さんの「わかたな」のAAですよ 0024Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:38:13.96ID:GELm5qV1 今日もここまでのボラ20ぴぴかあ 酷いな 0025Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:38:42.39ID:5qSmUsUI オージー綺麗に高値刈り終えたな 0026Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:38:50.43ID:8TIB9iEb (h) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to "submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion in a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate >>20 categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the information requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately shared information through other means." On September 15, 2017, the Secretary of Homeland Security submitted a report to me recommending entry restrictions and limitations on certain nationals of 7 countries determined to be "inadequate" in providing such information and in light of other factors discussed in the report. According to the report, the >>21 recommended restrictions would help address the threats that the countries' identity-management protocols, information-sharing inadequacies, and other risk factors pose to the security and welfare of the United States. The restrictions also encourage the countries to work with the United States to address those inadequacies and risks so that the restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclamation may be relaxed or removed as soon as possible. with appropriate Assistants to the President and members of the Cabinet, including >>22 the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, and the Attorney General. I considered several factors, including each country's capacity, ability, and willingness to cooperate with our identity-management and information-sharing policies and each country's risk factors, such as whether it has a significant terroris t presence within its territory. I also considered foreign policy, national security, a nd counterterrorism goals. I reviewed these factors and assessed these goals, with a particular focus on crafting those country-specific restrictions that would be most likely to encourage cooperation given each country's distinct circumstances, and that would, at the same time, protect the United States until such time as i mprovements occur. The restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclama tion are, in my judgment, necessary to prevent the entry of those foreign nationals about whom the United States Government lacks sufficient information to assess the risks they pose to the United States. These restrictions and limitations are also needed to elicit improved identity-management and information-sharing protocols and practices from foreign governments; and to advance foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives. (ii) After reviewing the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017, and accounting for the foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives of the United States, I have determined to restrict and limit the entry of nationals of 7 countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, >>23 Venezuela, and Yemen. These restrictions distinguish between the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants. Persons admitted on immigrant visas become lawful permanen t residents of the United States. Such persons may present national security or public-safety concerns that may be distinct from those admitted as nonimmigrants. The United States affords lawful permanent residents more enduring rights than it does to nonimmigrants. Lawful permanent residents are more difficult to remove than nonimmigrants even after national security concerns arise, which heightens the costs and dangers of errors ass 0027Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:39:29.17ID:iiZ/tEg1 我ながら海物語のキュインにビックリしてしまった お恥ずかしい 0028Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:40:34.15ID:XEBmC2mR 調子に乗るなよ 0029Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:41:31.90ID:Uj6CyOeD (´･ω･`)またワッチョイない 0030Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:41:41.47ID:3m0Qz0jF 上かよ 下げたから損切ってドテンSしたのに 0031Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:42:13.27ID:8TIB9iEb (iii) I am adopting a more tailored approach with respect to nonimmigrants, in accordance with the recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security. For some countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section, I am restricting the entry of all nonimmigrants. For countries with certain mitigating factors, such as a willingness to cooperate or play a substantial role in combatting terrorism, I am restricting t he entry only of certain categories of nonimmigrants, which will mitigate the security threats presented by their entry into the United States. In those cases in which future cooperation seems reasonably likely, and accounting for foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives, I have tailored the restrictions to encourage such improvements. >>24
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provided that the "Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security may also submit to the President the names of additional countries fo r which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States." The Secretary of Homeland Security determined that Somalia generally satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section, but its government's inability to effective ly and consistently cooperate, combined with the terrorist threat that emanates from its territory, present into the United States. Somalia's identity-management deficiencies and the significant terrorist presence within its territory make it a source of particular risks to the national security and public safety of the United States. Based on the considerations mentioned above, and as described further in section 2(h) of this proclamation, I have determined that entry restrictions, limitations, and other measure s designed to ensure proper screening and vetting for nationals of Somalia are necessary for the security and welfare of the United States. >>25
(j) Section 2 of this proclamation describes some of the inadequacies that led me to impose restrictions on the specified countries. Describing all of those reasons publicly, however, would cause serious damage to the national security of the United States, and many such descriptions are classified.
>>27 Sec. 2. Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Identified Concern. The entry into the United States of nationals of the following countries is hereby suspended and limited, as follows, subject to categorical exception s and case by-case waivers, as described in sections 3 and 6 of this proclamation:
(i) The government of Chad is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the United States Government looks forward to expanding t hat cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Chad has shown a clear willingness to improve in these areas. Nonetheless, Chad does not adequately share public-safety and terrorism-related information and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion. Additionally, several terrorist groups are active within Chad or in the surrounding region, including elements of Boko Haram, ISIS-West Africa, and al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb. At this time, additional information sharing to identify those foreign nationals applying for visas or seeking entry into the United States who represent national security and public-safety threats is necessary given the significant terrorism-related risk from this country. 0032Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:42:18.29ID:ma8fEV7/>>30 往復ビンタおめ(*‘ω‘ *) 0033Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:42:19.86ID:u9TVDAjj 日本人に生まれた時点で20％引きが確定してるから 0034Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:43:03.20ID:Dzmsdtwg あ～日足21maかここ 0035Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:43:03.61ID:r8sxG1xA おんぎ！おんぎっぎ！！ 0036Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:43:15.37ID:3m0Qz0jF>>32 ありがとう 0037Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:01.43ID:2EkyrUoY 効かないねえ ゴムだからぁ！ 0038Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:06.31ID:ma8fEV7/>>36 いえいえ どういたしまして(*‘ω‘ *) 0039Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:07.84ID:hFxg8nei きたか（ガタッ 0040Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:24.11ID:iiZ/tEg1 ユロルの崩れなさなにこれ 0041Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:26.56ID:1VC07YqC>>33 日本人---おとなしいな・・・
森友-8億-値引き---あははは---それを、アベチャンが必死に擁護してる。
ま、ええけどな・・・来年納税-300万近い・・・あああ・・・ウザイなあああ。。。逃げるか？ 0042Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:44:59.64ID:GKQ9CLDa これは円安来るか？ 0043Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:45:16.74ID:8TIB9iEb (i) Iran regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks, fails to satisfy at l east one key risk criterion, is the source of significant terrorist threats, and fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The Department of State has also designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism. >>32>>33
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Iran as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is hereby s uspended, except that entry by such nationals under valid student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas is not suspended, although such individuals should be subject to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.
(c) Libya.
(i) The government of Libya is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the United States Government looks forward to expanding on that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Libya, nonetheless , faces significant challenges in sharing several types of information, including public-safety and terrorism-related information necessary for the protection of the national security and public safety of the United States. Libya also has significant inadequacies in its identity-management protocols. Further, Libya fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion and has been assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The substantial terrorist presence within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Libya, as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended. >>34
(d) North Korea.
(i) North Korea does not cooperate with the United States Government in any respect and fails to satisfy all information-sharing requirements.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of North Korea as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
(i) Syria regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks, is the source of significant terrorist threats, and has been designated by the Department of State as a state sponsor of terrorism. Syria has significant inadequacies in identity-management protocols, fails to share public-safety and t errorism information, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Syria as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended. >>37 (f) Venezuela.
(i) Venezuela has adopted many of the baseline standard s identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security and in section 1 of this proclamation, but its government is uncooperative in verifying whether its citizens pose national security or public-safety threats. Venezuela's government fails to share public-safety and terrorism-related information adequately, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion, and has been assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States. There are, however, alternative sources for obtaining information to verify the citizenship and identity of nationals from Venezuela . As a result, the restrictions imposed by this proclamation focus on government officials of Venezuela who are responsible for the identified inadequacies. 0044Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:46:07.48ID:ritMy6k4 はぁ 今年は借金作る為にFXしてた1年だった 0045Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:46:25.64ID:FQnYEhNy 日本いいと思うけどなあ 腐っても先進国だし 周り平和ボケした連中ばっかだから出し抜くのも簡単だし 0046Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:46:42.09ID:kQiqkEnd ..o彡⌒ミ 从 ・ω・ ) こんちわ l r＿_Y_.i| Ｕ_,§_,_,ゝ し(U)Ｊ 0047Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:46:59.05ID:VGsAwLOB 原油Ｌして
(i) The government of Yemen is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner, and the United States Government looks forward to expanding that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Yemen, nonetheless, faces significant identity-management challenges, which are amplified by the notable terrorist presence within its territory. The government of Yemen fails to satisfy critical identity-management requirements, does not share public-safety and terrorism-related information adequately, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Yemen as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(i) The Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017, determined that Somalia satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described in section 1(c) of this proclamation. But several other considerations support imposing entry restrictions and limitations on Somalia. Somalia has significant identity-management deficiencies. For example, while Somalia issues an electronic passport, the United States and many other countries do not recognize it. A persistent terrorist threat also emanates from Somalia's territory. The United States Government has identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven. Somalia stands apart from other countries in the degree to which its government lacks command and control of its territory, which greatly limits the effectiveness of its national capabilities in a variety of respects. Terrorists use under-governed areas in northern, central, and southern Somalia as safe havens from which to plan, facilitate, and conduct their operations. Somalia also remains a destination for individuals attempting to join terrorist groups that threaten the national security of the United States. The State Department's 2016 Country Reports on Terrorism observed that Somalia has not sufficiently degraded the ability of terrorist groups to plan and mount attacks from its territory. Further, despite having made significant progress toward formally federating its member states, and its willingness to fight terrorism, Somalia continues to struggle t o provide the governance needed to limit terrorists' freedom of movement, access to resources, and capacity to operate. The government of Somalia's lack of territorial control also compromises Somalia's ability, already limited because of poor recordkeeping, to share information about its nationals who pose criminal or terrorist risks. As a result of these and other factors, Somalia presents special concerns that distinguish it from other countries.
(>>45 ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Somalia as immigrants is hereby suspended. Additionally, visa adjudications for nationals of Somalia and decisions regarding their entry as nonimmigrants should be subject t o additional scrutiny to determine if applicants are connected to terrorist organizations or otherwise pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States. >>46
Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspensions and Limitations . (a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspensions of and limitations on entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclamation shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who: >>47
(i) are outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation; 0050Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:48:31.26ID:gUZjTN0G 上がるのかな 0051Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:48:32.51ID:1VC07YqC>>44 朝から---夜中まで--張り付き--チマ喰い専門--早漏は当たり前・・・
みんな、ガンバ。。。。あばよ 0055Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:51:05.89ID:xOd8jQCQ 朝一にポジったクソL助かったから夕方まで休憩しよ ここから上がるか下がるかさっぱり分からん 0056Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:52:23.55ID:Uj6CyOeD ( ･᷄ὢ･᷅ )今日まだ2ぺぺ死にたい… 0057Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:52:35.58ID:s7DtYQfW 月曜の窓が気になって0.50あたりじゃＬする気になれない 0058Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:52:46.20ID:4mjiM020 ショーター詰んだあああああああああ 0059Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:53:14.61ID:l83J+l9i これは今上さまもLかや 0060Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:53:31.99ID:8TIB9iEb (iii) any foreign national who has a document other than a visa -- such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding foil, or an advance parole document -- valid on the ap plicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation or issued on any date thereafter, that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission;
(iv) any dual national of a country designated under section 2 of this proclamation when the individual is traveling on a passport issued by a non-designated country;
(v) any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; or
(vi) any foreign national who has been granted asylum by the United States; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
(c) Waivers. Notwithstanding the suspensions of and limitations on entry set forth in section 2 of this proclamation, a consular officer, or the Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Commissioner's designee, as appropriate, may, in their discretion, grant waivers on a case-by-case basis to permit the entry of foreign nationals for whom entry is otherwise suspended or limited if such foreign nationals demonstrate that waivers would be appropriate and consistent with >>48
subsections (i) through (iv) of this subsection. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall coordinate to adopt guidance addressing the circumstances in which waivers may be appropriate for foreign nationals seeking entry as immigrants or nonimmigrants.
(i) A waiver may be granted only if a foreign national demonstrates to t he consular officer's or >>50CBP official's satisfaction that:
(A) denying entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(B) entry would not pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States; and
(C) entry would be in the national interest.
(ii) The guidance issued by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security under this subsection shall address the standards, policies, and procedures for: >>51 (A) determining whether the entry of a foreign national would not pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States;
(B) determining whether the entry of a foreign national would be in the national interest; >>52 (C) addressing and managing the risks of making such a determination in light of the inadequacies in information sharing, identity management, and other potential dangers posed by the nationals of individual countries subject to the restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclamation;
(D) assessing whether the United States has access, at the time of the waiver determination, to sufficient information about the foreign national to determine whether entry would satisfy the requirements of subsection (i) of this subsection; and
(E) determining the special circumstances that would justify granting a waiver under subsection (iv)(E) of this subsection. >>56 >>59
(iv) Case-by-case waivers may not be granted categorically, but may be appropriate, subject to the limitations, conditions, and requirements set forth under subsection ( i) of this subsection and the guidance issued under subsection (ii) of this subsection, in individual circumstances such as the following: 0061Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:53:40.93ID:KO1qT37b>>52 . ﾉｼ (´･ω･`) 刈られたわorz あんな値動きされたらひとたまりも無いお。 今ｱｲﾌｫのｷｬｯｼｭﾊﾞｯｸを使ってｽｷｬしてる。 0062Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:54:30.89ID:Q8HlJSBx>>47 焼身自殺？ 0063Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:54:35.60ID:iiZ/tEg1>>61 まじか。ちょっとは利益でたんやろ？ だいぶ下からLしてたよね？ 0064Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:54:54.70ID:l83J+l9i だがクロスがついてこない 0065Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:55:02.42ID:HjFJdGcc １１：５１ １１２，４７ １２：１３ １１２，５２ どうやって１１２，３７を買ってん？
【USD/JPY】新ドル円スレ12045【雑談・コテ禁・IP無し】 http://hayabusa9.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/livemarket2/1512421269/0066Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:55:14.99ID:+YWsBxxR ロンガーのヌカ喜び ワロタw 0067Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:55:40.53ID:oLN2rKpg FX全然面白くないな トレンドでないし 0068Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:55:48.90ID:XEBmC2mR ガラ研うざい 0069Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:56:00.01ID:Hx1xyZYE>>65 どうせ後出しでドテンしたとかほざくよ(´・ω・`) 0070Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:56:11.12ID:l83J+l9i 1Hのストキャを小一時間ながめるところ 0071Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:56:36.77ID:8TIB9iEb (B) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts with the United States but is outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation for work, study, or other lawful activity;
(A) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity , is outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation, seeks to reenter the United States to resume tha t activity, and the denial of reentry would impair that activity;
(C) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or professional obligations and the denial of entry would impair those obligations;
(D) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside>>61
with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(E) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual>>62
needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
(F) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee), and the foreign national can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;
(G) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA; >>63
(H) the foreign national is a Canadian permanent resident who applie s for a visa at a location within Canada;
(I) the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government-sponsored exchange visitor; or >>64 >>65 >>66
(J) the foreign national is traveling to the United States, at the request of a United States Government department or agency, for legitimate law enforcement, foreign policy, or national security purposes.
Sec. 4. Adjustments to and Removal of Suspensions and Limitations. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, devise a process to assess whether any suspensions and limitations imposed by section 2 of t his proclamation should be continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented. The process shall account f or whether countries have improved their identity-management and information-sharing protocols and procedure s based on the criteria set forth in section 1 of this proclamation and the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017. Within 180 days of the date of this proclamation, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies, shall submit a report with recommendations to the President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, regarding the following: 0072Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:56:37.16ID:u9TVDAjj>>41 納税するほど儲かってるから全然勝ち組ですね こっちはついにFXで失った1000万円を取り返すのを諦めコツコツと社畜と化してる俺がいる 0073Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:56:57.41ID:RnTjeLpr ロンガーじゃないけど、戻してほしいところだな 0074Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:57:51.32ID:LlNxyvvV 休憩時間にちょっとＳした瞬間プップカプップカしやがって、ヒヤヒヤしたわボケコラ！微益撤退で休憩終わりや！
舐めた動きしやがってタココラ！ 0075Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:57:57.49ID:KO1qT37b>>63 . ﾉｼ (´･ω･`) Lのﾋﾟﾗﾐｯﾄﾞ積んでたからね、文字通り一網打尽にやられたわ。 ﾛﾝｶｽもﾌﾟﾘｶｽも損失の穴埋めに形振り構わず動かしてくるね。 0076Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:58:14.00ID:XEBmC2mR オセアニアかえー 0077Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:58:46.92ID:y4UFaeKQ 右にまいりまーす 0078Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:59:20.87ID:l83J+l9i 昨日のトラップは極うすかったなー 0079Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:59:46.23ID:8TIB9iEb (i) the interests of the United States, if any, that continue to require the suspension of, or limitations on, the entry on certain classes of nationals of countries identified in section 2 of this proclamation and whether the restrictions and limitations imposed by section 2 of this proclamation should be continued, modified, terminated, or supplemented; and
(ii) the interests of the United States, if any, that require the suspension of, or limitations on, the entry of certain classes of nationals of countries not identified in this proclamation.
(b) The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and the head of any other executive department or agency (agency) that the Secretary of State deems appropriate, shall engage the countries listed in section 2 of this proclamation , and any other countries that have information-sharing, identity-management, or risk-factor deficiencies as practicable, appropriate, and consistent with >>73
the foreign policy, national security, and public-safety objectives of the United States.
(c) Notwithstanding the process described above, and consistent with the process described in section 2(f) of Executive Order 13780, if the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General , and the Director of National Intelligence, determines, at any time, that a country meets the standards of the baseline described in section 1(c) of this proclamation, that a country has an adequate plan to provide such information, or that one or more of the restrictions or limitations imposed on the entry of a country's nationals are no longer necessary for the security or welfare of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security may recommend to the President the removal or modification of any or all such restrictions and limitations. The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, or the Attorney General may also, as provided for in Executive Order 13780, submit to the President the names of additional countries for which any of them recommends any lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States.
Sec. 5. Reports on Screening and Vetting Procedures. >>72
(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Director of Nationa l Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies shall submit periodic reports to th e President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, that:
(i) describe the steps the United States Government has taken to>>74 improve vetting for nationals of all foreign countries, including through improved collection of biometric and biographic data; >>75
(ii) describe the scope and magnitude of fraud, errors, false information, and unverifiable claims, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security on the basis of a validation s tudy, made in applications for immigration benefits under the immigration laws; and >>76 >>77
(iii) evaluate the procedures related to screening and vetting established by the Department of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs in order to enhance the safety and security of the United States and to ensure sufficient review of applications for immigration benefits.
(b) The initial report required under subsection (a) of this section shall be submitted within 180 days of the date of this proclamation; the second report shall be submitted withi n 270 days of the first report; and reports shall be submitted annually thereafter. 0080Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:59:48.93ID:r8sxG1xA なんやあああああああああああ 0081Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 13:59:54.18ID:elLW+ykP ほああああ 0082Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:06.48ID:iiZ/tEg1>>75 あっ買い増してたなぁ。 残念やね。 0083Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:06.76ID:Uj6CyOeD ( ˘ω˘ )昨日の113攻防は面白かった 0084Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:14.54ID:3m0Qz0jF 抜けたああああ 0085Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:18.15ID:avzwXsnQ ｷﾀｷﾀｷﾀｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ≡(ﾟ∀ﾟ≡ﾟ∀ﾟ)≡ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━!! 0086Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:22.59ID:GELm5qV1 ユーロ、ポンド関係以外は最近はどこもボラないんだな 0087Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:32.72ID:W6hRxsqV この円売りは何ぞ？ 0088Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:35.21ID:2tMvv8Vq 14時1分前に何でこんな動き方するんだよｗ 14時ジャストならともかく 0089Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:37.66ID:+YWsBxxR また日銀か 0090Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:40.99ID:hFxg8nei 試される握力 0091Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:41.35ID:nRHPs+3K 火柱ワロタ 0092１１２．３７２ドデンＬ☆２５０枚(・ω・)2017/12/05(火) 14:00:45.85ID:CrjRovmh 年金使い果たせや 0093Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:00:50.03ID:YjSfO9w8 すげー 0094Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:03.37ID:l83J+l9i クルドの残党救助やろなあ 0095Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:20.82ID:50UQDsab ハゲたぁー 0096Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:28.02ID:nRHPs+3K 日経プラスにしたいという謎の力 0097Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:31.87ID:ma8fEV7/>>30 往復ビンタおめ(*‘ω‘ *) 0098Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:40.79ID:3m0Qz0jF しょっぼ 0099Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:01:56.86ID:KO1qT37b . ﾉｼ (´･ω･`) 昨日もこんな値動きじゃなかったけ？ 0100Trader＠Live!2017/12/05(火) 14:02:08.20ID:l83J+l9i ここ数日は80好き好きライン
