【USD/JPY】新ドル円スレ12046【雑談・コテ禁・IP無し】
レス数が1000を超えています。これ以上書き込みはできません。
「￣￣了
l h「￢丨 ＜日本語くらいわかれよアニ豚声豚基地外屑ニートのID:RH7HOye50
／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿
／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ
/ ／∧ / / /.i l iー――‐u'￣
./ ／ Д｀ / / / / l l
i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ' l l
. / _/ ＼ !、 lヽ＿＿＿_」 l
. !、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./
ﾄ、＿_＼/ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y l
l ￣( ）y ） /l i
l l Y''/ー' / .l l
!、 l l./ / l l
/ / l/ ,/ i'
/_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」
L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」
`ー' `ヽ＿」 http://hissi.org/read.php/livemarket1/20171205/Ukg3SE95ZTUw.html
日経225先物オプション実況スレ29329
2 ：山師さん＠トレード中[sage]：2017/12/05(火) 01:18:26.05 ID:RH7HOye50
>>1=いじめられっ子酢豚のスレかｗ
日経225先物オプション実況スレ29331
4 ：山師さん＠トレード中[sage]：2017/12/05(火) 06:00:45.36 ID:RH7HOye50
まだ起きてやがるｗ UK and EU fail to strike Brexit talks deal
The UK and EU have failed to reach an agreement to move to the next stage of Brexit talks, Theresa May has said.
The prime minister said talks would reconvene "before the end of the week" and she was "confident we will conclude this positively".
The talks are understood to have broken down after the Democratic Unionist Party refused to accept concessions on the Irish border issue.
Downing Street said that was not the only outstanding problem.
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a deal had been done, but the UK appeared to change its mind over the Irish border question after pressure from the DUP.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he told a press conference in Dublin.
Ireland 'disappointed' at no deal on Brexit
Kuenssberg: What on earth happened?
What will happen to EU citizens in the UK?
Sturgeon calls for 'special' Brexit deals
Northern Ireland's DUP has 10 MPs at Westminster, and their support is vital to the government.
This is because the Conservatives are without a Commons majority since June's general election, and rely on a deal with the DUP to ensure they can survive key votes.
How the talks broke down
Mrs May is understood to have broken off from talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker to speak to DUP leader Arlene Foster.
The UK had reportedly been prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name.
But Mrs Foster then said her party "will not accept any form of regulatory divergence" that separates Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
"During the call it was made plain to the PM that the DUP had significant concerns about the deal being discussed that gave concessions to the Dublin government," said the BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg.
"I understand Mrs Foster told Theresa May that she would not be able to support such a deal.
"It's been suggested too that there are 20 or so Conservative MPs who had serious misgivings about the compromises that were understood to be on the table."
Why is the DUP unhappy about the plan?
DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party would not accept any Brexit deal that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
Her party's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson claimed Brussels has been trying to "bounce the prime minister into acceding to the shape of a deal they want" and many of her own backbenchers would not accept it.
He said the DUP objected to the form of words used in a draft document, which he said referred to "regulatory alignment" and "no regulatory divergence" between Northern Ireland and the EU.
Both phrases were "simply EU speak for keeping Northern Ireland in the European market" and "in effect, part of the United Kingdom would be kept within the single market," he said.
Asked if the DUP would pull out of the confidence and supply agreement they have with the Conservative government in Westminster over this issue, he said: "I think that her (Theresa May) problem isn't going to be just with the DUP". The Irish prime minister's position
Leo Varadkar says he wants a written guarantee that there will be no return to a "hard border" between the Republic and Northern Ireland - and this is what he thought he had got.
"I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he said.
"I accept that the prime minister has asked for more time and I know that she faces many challenges, and I acknowledge that she is negotiating in good faith.
"But my position and that of the Irish government is unequivocal: Ireland wants to proceed to phase two.
"However, we cannot agree to do this unless we have firm guarantees that there will not be a hard border in Ireland under any circumstances."
He said it was important to listen to the DUP, but also to bear in mind the position of other parties in Northern Ireland - and it should not be forgotten that the majority in Northern Ireland voted to remain in the EU.
What did Theresa May say?
Speaking at a joint press conference in Brussels with Mr Juncker, Mrs May said: "We have been negotiating hard. And a lot of progress has been made. And on many of the issues there is a common understanding.
"And it is clear, crucially, that we want to move forward together.
"But on a couple of issues some differences do remain which require further negotiation and consultation."
What did Jean-Claude Juncker say?
The European Commission President said "it was not possible to reach complete agreement today" despite their "best efforts".
But he added: "I have to say that we were narrowing our positions to a huge extent today, thanks to the British prime minister, thanks to the willingness of the European Commission to have a fair deal with Britain.
"I'm still confident that we can reach sufficient progress before the European Council of 15 December.
"This is not a failure, this is the start of the very last round.
"I'm very confident that we will reach an agreement in the course of this week." UK political reaction
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "The real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election."
He added that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom".
Conservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government.
Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together,
and the mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy".
Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party.
The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added.
Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe.
The people of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit."
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Northern Ireland was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do
the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
Where the talks are at
The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress"
has been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border.
The UK has been set a deadline of this week to come forward with an improved offer on them,
and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December.
On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn).
Reality Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill?
On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those
who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status.
Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport.
Settled status will grant those who have spent five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens.
Ministers have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date
will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence".
Brexit: All you need to know Trump travel ban: Supreme Court lets restrictions take full effect
The US Supreme Court has ruled President Donald Trump's travel ban on six mainly Muslim countries can go fully into effect.
But the directive against travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen still faces legal challenges.
The ruling covers the third version of the directive that President Trump has issued since taking office.
On Monday, seven of the nine justices lifted injunctions imposed by lower courts on the policy.
Only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have allowed the president's order to remain blocked.
Federal appeals courts in San Francisco, California, and Richmond, Virginia, will hear arguments this week on whether the latest iteration of the policy is lawful.
Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news".
But she added: "It's important to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today."
"The fight continues."
How have Trump travel bans fared?
The president's travel bans have each been frustrated by the courts to some degree:
In January, he signed an order banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry.
The measure, which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges
A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens.
By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US, but granted a wide exemption for those with a "bona fide connection" to the US
President Trump's third order was announced in late September. It added non-Muslim-majority nations North Korea and Venezuela, provisions which lower courts have allowed to proceed
What have lower courts said?
In striking it down, federal judges have cited Mr Trump's campaign description of his policy as a "Muslim ban" and his call for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".
Lower courts have also found the president's policy violated the first amendment of the US constitution covering freedom of religion.
In October, a Maryland federal judge said: "The 'initial' announcement of the Muslim ban, offered repeatedly
and explicitly through President Trump's own statements, forcefully and persuasively expressed his purpose in unequivocal terms."
A federal judge in Hawaii said the administration "lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'".
A court in Virginia ruled: "The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable. The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed,
" the court ruling said, pointing out that the countries' populations were between 90% and 99% Muslim. Yemen's former leader, Ali Abdullah Salehha killed in Saousa
Former Yemen President Aria Abdullah Sale was murdered in the fight against supporters and former alliance Hautei revolt movement.
Officials of the People 's Congress of President Saleh said he died in an attack in the southern part of the capital Sana'a.
Houthis' leaders welcomed this news as a "very important opportunity".
Mr. Abdul Marik Al-Hawk said that he dismissed the "conspiracy" by the Saudi leader-led coalition government backing the government that had made peace negotiations with President Saleh.
Meanwhile, the UN said the air strikes of Sana intensified and the battle spread to other administrations like Haja.
According to a report of the UN Humanitarian Affairs Adjustment Office, the road was closed and tanks were on the street. Some of the most intense battles were in diplomatic areas near the UN forces.
After the death of Sareha, the future of Yemen is terrible
The Red Cross presumed that at least 125 people were killed and more than 230 people were injured as a riot occurred on Friday.
United Nations humanitarian affairs coordinator Jamie McGoldrick asked civilians to leave their homes on 5 December to seek assistance
and call for humanitarian stops for rescue workers to continue their life-saving program.
"They do not know what will come next ... children and young people - that is terribly sad" to the BBC.
"For us it is in a situation where we can not help them because we are bound in the same way and we do not have the ability to respond to their needs in the way we need them.
Ali Abdullah Saleh, the dominant power of Yemen
Yemen's conflict: Who is fighting with whom?
How did the rebel army civil war start?
Until recently, supporters of Salea were fighting side by side with Houthis in the fight against the present President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi.
But on Wednesday the conflict over Sanna's largest mosque control resulted in an armed conflict where more than 125 people died.
President Sarer suggested to "create a new page" with the coalition government led by Saudi Arabia, when he stopped blocking Yemen 's attacks and stopped blocking countries in Saturday.
Houthis condemned the "coup d'etat" against "an alliance he never believed".
How did Sale die?
By Sunday, Houthi's combatants dominated many of the capital, intense fights were taking place around Saleh's family and its allied houses.
Mr. Salare's home rioted Monday morning because the bombing of the ruling coalition leader led by Saudi did not stop Hautis. Soon thereafter, reports began to appear that he was killed.
A video circulated on social media showing a man's body resembling Mr. Sareha who has a severe head injury. That is, armed men came on a blanket shouting
."Please praise God." And "a little ant 's affash!" - the name of Mr. Saleh' s clan.
After that, officials of the People's Congress confirmed Sale's death. They said that the escort group, where he and the other officials were in,
received the firing of Houshi fighter, escaping from the south towards Sahan, the hometown of the prolums leader.
According to some reports, he was stopped by the RPG rocket and was temporarily killed and then removed from his car.
What was the reaction to the news?
Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi celebrated what he called "the Day of the Collapse of Rebellious Conspiracy." He also insisted that Houthis "has no problem" with GPC or its members.
But unknown GPC officials said to the Al Arabiya TV owned by Saudi that the Yemenians "should go to the street and face Haute's militia". This is because the Conservatives are without a Commons majority since June's general election, and rely on a deal with the DUP to ensure they can survive key votes.
How the talks broke down
Mrs May is understood to have broken off from talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker to speak to DUP leader Arlene Foster.
The UK had reportedly been prepared to accept that Northern Ireland may remain in the EU's customs union and single market in all but name.
But Mrs Foster then said her party "will not accept any form of regulatory divergence" that separates Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
"During the call it was made plain to the PM that the DUP had significant concerns about the deal being discussed that gave concessions to the Dublin government," said the BBC's political editor Laura Kuenssberg.
"I understand Mrs Foster told Theresa May that she would not be able to support such a deal.
"It's been suggested too that there are 20 or so Conservative MPs who had serious misgivings about the compromises that were understood to be on the table."
UK and EU fail to strike Brexit talks deal
The UK and EU have failed to reach an agreement to move to the next stage of Brexit talks, Theresa May has said.
The prime minister said talks would reconvene "before the end of the week" and she was "confident we will conclude this positively".
The talks are understood to have broken down after the Democratic Unionist Party refused to accept concessions on the Irish border issue.
Downing Street said that was not the only outstanding problem.
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a deal had been done, but the UK appeared to change its mind over the Irish border question after pressure from the DUP.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he told a press conference in Dublin.
Ireland 'disappointed' at no deal on Brexit
Kuenssberg: What on earth happened?
What will happen to EU citizens in the UK?
Sturgeon calls for 'special' Brexit deals
Northern Ireland's DUP has 10 MPs at Westminster, and their support is vital to the government.
Why is the DUP unhappy about the plan?
DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party would not accept any Brexit deal that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
Her party's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson claimed Brussels has been trying to "bounce the prime minister into acceding to the shape of a deal they want" and many of her own backbenchers would not accept it.
He said the DUP objected to the form of words used in a draft document, which he said referred to "regulatory alignment" and "no regulatory divergence" between Northern Ireland and the EU.
Both phrases were "simply EU speak for keeping Northern Ireland in the European market" and "in effect, part of the United Kingdom would be kept within the single market," he said.
Asked if the DUP would pull out of the confidence and supply agreement they have with the Conservative government in Westminster over this issue, he said: "I think that her (Theresa May) problem isn't going to be just with the DUP". ＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡
|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
The US Supreme Court has ruled President Donald Trump's travel ban on six mainly Muslim countries can go fully into effect.
But the directive against travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen still faces legal challenges.
The ruling covers the third version of the directive that President Trump has issued since taking office.
On Monday, seven of the nine justices lifted injunctions imposed by lower courts on the policy.
Only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have allowed the president's order to remain blocked.
| - | ― | |
| ´
| ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣
￣￣ ノノ ＼
How have Trump travel bans fared?
The president's travel bans have each been frustrated by the courts to some degree:
In January, he signed an order banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry.
The measure, which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges
A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens.
By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US, but granted a wide exemption for those with a "bona fide connection" to the US
President Trump's third order was announced in late September. It added non-Muslim-majority nations North Korea and Venezuela, provisions which lower courts have allowed to proceed
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ）
｀l Τ（ ）
￣ |
￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
ｔrump travel ban: Supreme Court lets restrictions take full effect
Federal appeals courts in San Francisco, California, and Richmond, Virginia, will hear arguments this week on whether the latest iteration of the policy is lawful.
Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news".
But she added: "It's important to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today."
"The fight continues."
What have lower courts said?
In striking it down, federal judges have cited Mr Trump's campaign description of his policy as a "Muslim ban" and his call for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".
Lower courts have also found the president's policy violated the first amendment of the US constitution covering freedom of religion.
In October, a Maryland federal judge said: "The 'initial' announcement of the Muslim ban, offered repeatedly
and explicitly through President Trump's own statements, forcefully and persuasively expressed his purpose in unequivocal terms."
A federal judge in Hawaii said the administration "lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'".
A court in Virginia ruled: "The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable. The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed,
" the court ruling said, pointing out that the countries' populations were between 90% and 99% Muslim. ヽヽ ヽヽ ヽヽ ヽヽ
──┐. | | ──┐. | | ──┐. | | ──┐. | |
/ | | / | | / | | / | | ─────
ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ ┐ ノ ノ
┴ ┴ ┴
＼(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ(＾ω＾ ）おっ／
／⌒ヽ ／⌒ヽ. ／⌒ヽ. ／⌒ヽ ／⌒ヽ
(＾ω＾ ） ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ） (＾ω＾ ) ）
(っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O (っ⌒*⌒O
(_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_) (_ノ:∴:ヽ_)
／|￣￣::ヽ;ヽ￣￣￣:.ヽ:.;￣￣￣ヾヽ;.:￣￣￣ヽヾ￣￣￣￣ヾヾ￣￣￣
／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿 ／ |":●;:゛∵●;●;:●;:゛∵●;:;:゛∵●:●:●゛∵;,":●; ":●;":●;●;:●;:'
( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／ |:●;":●;":●;":●;":''`゛:;●;:●／⌒ヽ ●:●:●゛∵;,":●●●''`●;":●;"
／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵:●;:●;":●;":●;":●;":゛:;●;:●;( ＾ω＾)こっちにデカイうんちがあるお！i●;●、●''`
( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ;,、`●;．'';,,:●;":''`゛∵●;:●●''`●ノつ,:゛●;;:●;.／⌒ヽ;:本当かお！●;:'':●"''`:●゛:●;"
／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,、":●; 。 ''`゛∵;,":●; ":●●;'`●●,;:;";i●;;.;:'(＾ω＾ )⌒ヽノ';●:●:●゛∵;,":●●''`
( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ":●;;,、`●''●;:／⌒ヽ ● :●;;,, :●●;.●;:,:.;:●;●..:⊂⊂ ととノ,:.;●''`●":●;●:●:●゛∵;
／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,、'':●:●;:。● (＾ω＾ ):.／⌒ヽ●;:●:●●''`● ,;:・゛∵●;:●;●.,●,.／⌒ヽ;:●;: ）:●;;,,
( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／`；ヾ;,、`●;．●''`●;:●;ノつ●●(＾ω＾ )⌒ヽノ''`●:●;:''":●;;,, ●;:●;:''" と(＾ω＾ )つ,_,,_)つ:●;;,,
／⌒ヽ, '⌒｀ヽ丿｀J ;'・ミ∵;,":●;、 ●;:●;:●;'`●●,;:;"; ⊂⊂ ととノ,;:;●''`●;:●;:''":●;;,, :●;,●:●●幸せだお～''`●;●;;,,
( ＾ω＾), （ *） ／ `；":●;ヾ;,、`●''`●;:●;:''":●;;,●、●''`●うんこウマスｗｗｗ;:●:●●''`●;:''":, ●;．":●;":●;'';,,●''`●;:''
(ノU " し ｀J ;'・ミ∵":●;;,、":●;。 ;,●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":
／`；ヾ;,、`●;．":●;'":●;';,,":●●、●''`●;:●、●''`●;:●:●●''`●;:''":●:●●''`●;:''":●●''`●;:''":●''`●;:''":●
／":●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;●;":●;":●;、●''`●;:●:●、●''`●;:●:●`●;:'
￣￣| >>1
考えたら---社畜も専業も、、、みんな--政府に毟り取られてるんだなぁぁ・・・
税金-20％--一律。。。。ｗｗっｗ．。。。億トレも-20％--オレも・・・
なんか不公平やなぁぁ・・・・・ああああああああ (i) Identity-management information. The United States
expects foreign governments to provide the information need
ed to determine >>13
whether individuals seeking benefits under the immigration laws ar
e who they claim to be. The identity-management information category
focuses on the integrity of documents required>>14
for travel to the United States. The criteria asses
sed in this category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedde
d with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen passports to appropriate entities, and makes available
upon request identity-related information not included in
its passports.
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The
United States expects foreign governments to provide information
about whether persons who seek entry to this country pose
national security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed i>>15
n
this category include whether the country makes available, d
irectly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and criminal-history
information upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the countr
y impedes the United States Government's receipt of information about passengers and crew traveling to the United States.
(iii) National security and public-safety risk assessment. The national security and public-safety risk assessment category f
ent of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Department
of State, collected data on the performance
of all foreign governments and assessed each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section.
The assessment focused, in particular, on identity management, security and public-safety threats, and national security risks.
Through this assessment, the agencies measured each country'
s performance with respect to issuing reliable travel documents a
nd implementing adequate identity-management and information-sharing protocols and procedures, and evaluated terrorism-relate
d and public-safety risks associated with foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States from each country.
>>16
(e) The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this sectio
(g) The Secretary of Homeland Security assesses that the following countries continue to have "
inadequate" identity-management protocols, information-sharing pra
ctices, and risk factors, with respect
to the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section, such that entry restrictions and limitations are recommended:
Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The Secretary of Homeland Security also assesses that Iraq did not meet the
baseline, but that entry restrictions and limitations under a President
ial proclamation are not warranted. The Secretary of Homeland Security recommend
s, however, that nationals of Iraq who seek to enter the United States be s>>17
ubject to additional scrutiny to determine if they pose risks to the national security o
r public safety of the United States. In reaching these conclusions, the Secr
etary of Homeland Security considered the close cooperative relationship between
the United States and the democratically elected government of Iraq, the
strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of Un
ited States forces in Iraq, and Iraq's commitment to combating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). 利益20万以下だから税金は申告しない予定(´・ω・`) >>16
そこで安倍さんの「わかたな」のAAですよ (h) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 directed the Secretary of
Homeland Security to "submit to the President a list of countries recommended
for inclusion in a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate
>>20
categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the information
requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that
the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately shared information
through other means." On September 15, 2017, the Secretary of Homeland Security
submitted a report to me recommending entry restrictions and limitations on certain
nationals of 7 countries determined to be "inadequate" in providing such information
and in light of other factors discussed in the report. According to the report, the
>>21
recommended restrictions would help address the threats that the countries'
identity-management protocols, information-sharing inadequacies, and other
risk factors pose to the security and welfare of the United States. The restrictions
also encourage the countries to work with the United States to address those
inadequacies and risks so that the restrictions and limitations imposed by this
proclamation may be relaxed or removed as soon as possible.
with appropriate Assistants to the President and members of the Cabinet, including
>>22
the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, and the Attorney
General. I considered several factors, including each country's capacity, ability,
and willingness to cooperate with our identity-management and information-sharing
policies and each country's risk factors, such as whether it has a significant terroris
t presence within its territory. I also considered foreign policy, national security, a
nd counterterrorism goals. I reviewed these factors and assessed these goals,
with a particular focus on crafting those country-specific restrictions that would
be most likely to encourage cooperation given each country's distinct circumstances,
and that would, at the same time, protect the United States until such time as i
mprovements occur. The restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclama
tion are, in my judgment, necessary to prevent the entry of those foreign nationals
about whom the United States Government lacks sufficient information to assess
the risks they pose to the United States. These restrictions and limitations
are also needed to elicit improved identity-management and information-sharing
protocols and practices from foreign governments; and to advance foreign policy,
national security, and counterterrorism objectives.
(ii) After reviewing the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September
15, 2017, and accounting for the foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism
objectives of the United States, I have determined to restrict and limit the entry of
nationals of 7 countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline
described in subsection (c) of this section: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria,
>>23
Venezuela, and Yemen. These restrictions distinguish between the entry of immigrants
and nonimmigrants. Persons admitted on immigrant visas become lawful permanen
t residents of the United States. Such persons may present national security
or public-safety concerns that may be distinct from those admitted as nonimmigrants.
The United States affords lawful permanent residents more enduring rights than it does to nonimmigrants.
Lawful permanent residents are more difficult to remove than nonimmigrants even after national security concerns arise, which heightens the costs and dangers of errors ass 我ながら海物語のキュインにビックリしてしまった
お恥ずかしい (iii) I am adopting a more tailored approach with respect to nonimmigrants,
in accordance with the recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security.
For some countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline
described in subsection (c) of this section, I am restricting the entry of all nonimmigrants.
For countries with certain mitigating factors, such as a willingness to
cooperate or play a substantial role in combatting terrorism, I am restricting t
he entry only of certain categories of nonimmigrants, which will mitigate the security
threats presented by their entry into the United States. In those cases in which future
cooperation seems reasonably likely, and accounting for foreign policy, national security,
and counterterrorism objectives, I have tailored the restrictions to encourage such improvements.
>>24
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provided that the
"Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security
may also submit to the President the names of additional countries fo
r which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations
deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States."
The Secretary of Homeland Security determined that Somalia generally
satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described
in subsection (c) of this section, but its government's inability to effective
ly and consistently cooperate, combined with the terrorist threat that
emanates from its territory, present
into the United States. Somalia's identity-management deficiencies
and the significant terrorist presence within its territory make it a
source of particular risks to the national security and public safety
of the United States. Based on the considerations mentioned above,
and as described further in section 2(h) of this proclamation, I have
determined that entry restrictions, limitations, and other measure
s designed to ensure proper screening and vetting for nationals of
Somalia are necessary for the security and welfare of the United States.
>>25
(j) Section 2 of this proclamation describes some of the
inadequacies that led me to impose restrictions on the specified
countries. Describing all of those reasons publicly, however, would
cause serious damage to the national security of the United States,
and many such descriptions are classified.
>>27
Sec. 2. Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Identified Concern.
The entry into the United States of nationals of the following countries is hereby
suspended and limited, as follows, subject to categorical exception
s and case by-case waivers, as described in sections 3 and 6 of this proclamation:
(a) Chad. >>27
>>28
>>29
>>30
(i) The government of Chad is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner
of the United States, and the United States Government looks forward to expanding t
hat cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Chad
has shown a clear willingness to improve in these areas. Nonetheless, Chad does not
adequately share public-safety and terrorism-related information and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
Additionally, several terrorist groups are active within Chad or in the surrounding region, including elements
of Boko Haram, ISIS-West Africa, and al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb. At this time, additional information
sharing to identify those foreign nationals applying for visas or seeking entry into the United States who
represent national security and public-safety threats is necessary given
the significant terrorism-related risk from this country. >>36
いえいえ
どういたしまして(*‘ω‘ *) >>33
日本人---おとなしいな・・・
森友-8億-値引き---あははは---それを、アベチャンが必死に擁護してる。
ま、ええけどな・・・来年納税-300万近い・・・あああ・・・ウザイなあああ。。。逃げるか？ (i) Iran regularly fails to cooperate with the United States
Government in identifying security risks, fails to satisfy at l
east one key risk criterion, is the source of significant terrorist threats, and fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders
of removal from the United States. The Department of State
has also designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism. >>32>>33
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Iran as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is hereby s
uspended, except that entry by such nationals under valid
student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas is not suspended, although such individuals should be subject
to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.
(c) Libya.
(i) The government of Libya is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the United States Government
looks forward to expanding on that cooperation, including in
the areas of immigration and border management. Libya, nonetheless
, faces significant challenges in sharing several types of information,
including public-safety and terrorism-related information necessary for the protection of the national security and public safety of the United States.
Libya also has significant inadequacies in its identity-management protocols.
Further, Libya fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion and has been
assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationals subject to
final orders of removal from the United States. The substantial terrorist presence
within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Libya, as immigrants,
and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
>>34
(d) North Korea.
(i) North Korea does not cooperate with the United States
Government in any respect and fails to satisfy all information-sharing requirements.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of
North Korea as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
(e) Syria.
>>35
(i) Syria regularly fails to cooperate with the
United States Government in identifying security risks, is the source of significant terrorist
threats, and has been designated by the Department of State as a state sponsor of terrorism.
Syria has significant inadequacies in identity-management protocols, fails to share public-safety and t
errorism information, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Syria as
immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
>>37
(f) Venezuela.
(i) Venezuela has adopted many of the baseline standard
s identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security and in section 1 of this proclamation, but
its government is uncooperative in verifying whether its citizens pose national security or public-safety threats.
Venezuela's government fails to share public-safety and terrorism-related information adequately, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion,
and has been assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States.
There are, however, alternative sources for obtaining information to verify the citizenship and identity of nationals from Venezuela
. As a result, the restrictions imposed by this proclamation focus on government
officials of Venezuela who are responsible for the identified inadequacies. 日本いいと思うけどなあ
腐っても先進国だし
周り平和ボケした連中ばっかだから出し抜くのも簡単だし ..o彡⌒ミ
从 ・ω・ ) こんちわ
l r＿_Y_.i|
Ｕ_,§_,_,ゝ
し(U)Ｊ Yemen.
(i) The government of Yemen is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner,
and the United States Government looks forward to expanding that cooperation, including
in the areas of immigration and border management. Yemen, nonetheless, faces significant
identity-management challenges, which are amplified by the notable terrorist presence within its territory.
The government of Yemen fails to satisfy critical identity-management requirements,
does not share public-safety and terrorism-related information adequately, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Yemen as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1),
tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(h) Somalia.
>>44
(i) The Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017, determined that Somalia satisfies
the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described in section 1(c) of this proclamation.
But several other considerations support imposing entry restrictions and limitations on Somalia.
Somalia has significant identity-management deficiencies. For example, while Somalia
issues an electronic passport, the United States and many other countries do not recognize it.
A persistent terrorist threat also emanates from Somalia's territory. The United States
Government has identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven. Somalia stands apart from other
countries in the degree to which its government lacks command and control of its territory,
which greatly limits the effectiveness of its national capabilities in a variety of respects.
Terrorists use under-governed areas in northern, central, and southern Somalia as safe
havens from which to plan, facilitate, and conduct their operations. Somalia also remains a destination for individuals attempting to
join terrorist groups that threaten the national security of the United States. The State Department's 2016 Country Reports
on Terrorism observed that Somalia has not sufficiently degraded the ability of terrorist groups to plan and mount attacks from its territory.
Further, despite having made significant progress toward formally federating its member
states, and its willingness to fight terrorism, Somalia continues to struggle t
o provide the governance needed to limit terrorists' freedom of movement, access to resources, and capacity to operate.
The government of Somalia's lack of territorial control also compromises Somalia's ability,
already limited because of poor recordkeeping, to share information about its nationals
who pose criminal or terrorist risks. As a result of these and other factors, Somalia presents special
concerns that distinguish it from other countries.
(>>45
ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Somalia as immigrants is hereby suspended.
Additionally, visa adjudications for nationals of Somalia and decisions regarding their entry as nonimmigrants should be subject t
o additional scrutiny to determine if applicants are connected to terrorist organizations or
otherwise pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States.
>>46
Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspensions and Limitations
. (a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection
(b) of this section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspensions
of and limitations on entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclamation shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:
>>47
(i) are outside the United States on the applicable effective
date under section 7 of this proclamation; >>44
朝から---夜中まで--張り付き--チマ喰い専門--早漏は当たり前・・・
これで--10年過ぎる・・・あああ・・・不労所得？---どこがやねんんｎ
専業もキツイ稼業やな >>48
ノシちゃん昨日のハイレバちゃんと利確できた？ 窓埋めも終わったし雇用統計に向けて期待上げが始まるな >>
最後に、 損切りは、必要経費・・・・しゃないな・・・
みんな、ガンバ。。。。あばよ 朝一にポジったクソL助かったから夕方まで休憩しよ
ここから上がるか下がるかさっぱり分からん 月曜の窓が気になって0.50あたりじゃＬする気になれない (iii) any foreign national who has a document other than a visa
-- such as a transportation letter, an appropriate boarding
foil, or an advance parole document -- valid on the ap
plicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation
or issued on any date thereafter, that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission;
(iv) any dual national of a country designated under section
2 of this proclamation when the individual is traveling on
a passport issued by a non-designated country;
(v) any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type
visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; or
(vi) any foreign national who has been granted asylum by the United
States; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or
any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole,
or protection under the Convention Against Torture.
(c) Waivers. Notwithstanding the suspensions of and limitations on entry set
forth in section 2 of this proclamation, a consular officer, or the Commissioner,
United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Commissioner's
designee, as appropriate, may, in their discretion, grant waivers on a case-by-case
basis to permit the entry of foreign nationals for whom entry is otherwise suspended or
limited if such foreign nationals demonstrate that waivers would be appropriate and consistent with >>48
subsections (i) through (iv) of this subsection. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security
shall coordinate to adopt guidance addressing the circumstances in which waivers may be appropriate for foreign nationals seeking entry as immigrants or nonimmigrants.
(i) A waiver may be granted only if a foreign national demonstrates to t
he consular officer's or >>50CBP official's satisfaction that:
(A) denying entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(B) entry would not pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States; and
(C) entry would be in the national interest.
(ii) The guidance issued by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of
Homeland Security under this subsection shall address the standards, policies, and procedures for:
>>51
(A) determining whether the entry of a foreign national would not pose a
threat to the national security or public safety of the United States;
(B) determining whether the entry of a foreign national would be in the national interest;
>>52
(C) addressing and managing the risks of making such a determination
in light of the inadequacies in information sharing, identity management,
and other potential dangers posed by the nationals of individual countries subject to the restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclamation;
(D) assessing whether the United States has access, at the time of the waiver
determination, to sufficient information about the foreign national to determine whether entry would satisfy the requirements of subsection (i) of this subsection; and
(E) determining the special circumstances that would justify granting a waiver under subsection (iv)(E) of this subsection.
>>56
>>59
(iv) Case-by-case waivers may not be granted categorically, but may be appropriate,
subject to the limitations, conditions, and requirements set forth under subsection (
i) of this subsection and the guidance issued under subsection (ii) of this subsection, in individual circumstances such as the following: >>52
. ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) 刈られたわorz
あんな値動きされたらひとたまりも無いお。
今ｱｲﾌｫのｷｬｯｼｭﾊﾞｯｸを使ってｽｷｬしてる。 >>61
まじか。ちょっとは利益でたんやろ？
だいぶ下からLしてたよね？ １１：５１ １１２，４７
１２：１３ １１２，５２
どうやって１１２，３７を買ってん？
646 １１３．０７１ドデンＳ☆２５０枚(・ω・) 私が新ドルスレのオーナーです( ；∀；) ▼ New! 2017/12/05(火) 11:51:25.73 ID:b+htcbJb [19回目]
無職がすぐにワシをネットいじめするから(・Д・)
リスナーさんに向けてツイートしとるんじゃ(・Д・)
馬鹿が！無職が！(・Д・)
726 １１２．３７２ドデンＬ☆２５０枚(・ω・) 私が新ドルスレのオーナーです( ；∀；) ▼ New! 2017/12/05(火) 12:13:13.37 ID:b+htcbJb [20回目]
Wﾎﾞﾄやん(*´ω｀*)
教科書｡｡(*´ω｀*)
ﾍﾔｶﾞﾗ(*´ω｀*)
【USD/JPY】新ドル円スレ12045【雑談・コテ禁・IP無し】
http://hayabusa9.5ch.net/test/read.cgi/livemarket2/1512421269/ >>65
どうせ後出しでドテンしたとかほざくよ(´・ω・`) (B) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts
with the United States but is outside the United States on the applicable
effective date under section 7 of this proclamation for work, study, or other lawful activity;
(A) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States
for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity
, is outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section
7 of this proclamation, seeks to reenter the United States to resume tha
t activity, and the denial of reentry would impair that activity;
(C) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant
business or professional obligations and the denial of entry would impair those obligations;
(D) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside>>61
with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United
States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid
nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(E) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual>>62
needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
(F) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United
States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee),
and the foreign national can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;
(G) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international
organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities
Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings
or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA;
>>63
(H) the foreign national is a Canadian permanent resident who applie
s for a visa at a location within Canada;
(I) the foreign national is traveling as a United States
Government-sponsored exchange visitor; or
>>64
>>65
>>66
(J) the foreign national is traveling to the United States, at the request of a United States
Government department or agency, for legitimate law enforcement, foreign policy, or national security purposes.
Sec. 4. Adjustments to and Removal of Suspensions and Limitations.
(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State,
devise a process to assess whether any suspensions and limitations imposed by section 2 of t
his proclamation should be continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented. The process shall account f
or whether countries have improved their identity-management and information-sharing protocols and procedure
s based on the criteria set forth in section 1 of this proclamation and the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017.
Within 180 days of the date of this proclamation, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with
the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies,
shall submit a report with recommendations to the President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, regarding the following: >>41
納税するほど儲かってるから全然勝ち組ですね
こっちはついにFXで失った1000万円を取り返すのを諦めコツコツと社畜と化してる俺がいる 休憩時間にちょっとＳした瞬間プップカプップカしやがって、ヒヤヒヤしたわボケコラ！微益撤退で休憩終わりや！
舐めた動きしやがってタココラ！ >>63
. ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) Lのﾋﾟﾗﾐｯﾄﾞ積んでたからね、文字通り一網打尽にやられたわ。
ﾛﾝｶｽもﾌﾟﾘｶｽも損失の穴埋めに形振り構わず動かしてくるね。 (i) the interests of the United States, if any, that continue to require the suspension of,
or limitations on, the entry on certain classes of nationals of countries identified in
section 2 of this proclamation and whether the restrictions and limitations imposed
by section 2 of this proclamation should be continued, modified, terminated, or supplemented; and
(ii) the interests of the United States, if any, that require the suspension of,
or limitations on, the entry of certain classes of nationals of countries not identified in this proclamation.
(b) The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of
Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General,
the Director of National Intelligence, and the head of any other executive
department or agency (agency) that the Secretary of State deems appropriate,
shall engage the countries listed in section 2 of this proclamation
, and any other countries that have information-sharing, identity-management,
or risk-factor deficiencies as practicable, appropriate, and consistent with >>73
the foreign policy, national security, and public-safety objectives of the United States.
(c) Notwithstanding the process described above, and consistent with
the process described in section 2(f) of Executive Order 13780, if the Secretary
of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General
, and the Director of National Intelligence, determines, at any time, that a country
meets the standards of the baseline described in section 1(c) of this proclamation,
that a country has an adequate plan to provide such information, or that one or more
of the restrictions or limitations imposed on the entry of a country's nationals are no
longer necessary for the security or welfare of the United States, the Secretary
of Homeland Security may recommend to the President the removal or modification
of any or all such restrictions and limitations. The Secretary of Homeland Security,
the Secretary of State, or the Attorney General may also, as provided for in Executive Order
13780, submit to the President the names of additional countries for which any of them
recommends any lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States.
Sec. 5. Reports on Screening and Vetting Procedures. >>72
(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security,
in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Director of Nationa
l Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies shall submit periodic reports to th
e President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, that:
(i) describe the steps the United States Government has taken to>>74
improve vetting for
nationals of all foreign countries, including through improved collection of biometric and biographic data;
>>75
(ii) describe the scope and magnitude of fraud, errors, false information, and unverifiable
claims, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security on the basis of a validation s
tudy, made in applications for immigration benefits under the immigration laws; and
>>76
>>77
(iii) evaluate the procedures related to screening and vetting established by the Department
of State's Bureau of Consular Affairs in order to enhance the safety and security of
the United States and to ensure sufficient review of applications for immigration benefits.
(b) The initial report required under subsection (a) of this section shall be submitted within
180 days of the date of this proclamation; the second report shall be submitted withi
n 270 days of the first report; and reports shall be submitted annually thereafter. ｷﾀｷﾀｷﾀｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ≡(ﾟ∀ﾟ≡ﾟ∀ﾟ)≡ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━!! ユーロ、ポンド関係以外は最近はどこもボラないんだな 14時1分前に何でこんな動き方するんだよｗ
14時ジャストならともかく . ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) 昨日もこんな値動きじゃなかったけ？ 株にも為替にも介入する日銀に
アメリカ様制裁して欲しい Sec. 7. Effective Dates. Executive Order 13780 ordered a temporary pause on the entry of foreign nationals from certain foreign countries.
In two cases, however, Federal courts have enjoined those restrictions.
The Supreme Court has stayed those injunctions as to foreign nationals who
lack a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity
in the United States, pending its review of the decisions of the lower courts.
(a) The restrictions and limitations established in section 2 of this proclamation
are effective at 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time on September 24, 2017, for foreign nationals who:
(i) were subject to entry restrictions under section 2 of Executive Order 13780,
or would have been subject to the restrictions but for section 3 of that Executive Order, and
(ii) lack a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a perso
n or entity in the United States.
(b) The restrictions and limitations established in section
2 of this proclamation are effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight t
ime on October 18, 2017, for all other persons subject to this proclamation, including nationals of:
(i) Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia who have a credible claim
of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States; and
(ii) Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela.
Sec. 8. Severability. It is the policy of the United States t
o enforce this proclamation to the maximum extent possible to
advance the national security, foreign policy, and counterterrorism interests of the United States. Accordingly:
(a) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of an
y provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the
remainder of this proclamation and the application of its other provision
s to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby; and
(b) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any
provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the lack of certain procedural requirements,
the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements to conform with existing law and with any applicable court orders.
Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this proclamation sha
ll be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or a
gency, or the head thereof; or
>>80-101
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This proclamation shall be implemented consistent with applicable
law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States,
its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of September,
in the year of our Lord two thousand seventeen, and of the Independence of the United States
of America the two hundred and forty-second. いやむしろボラ出させてるんだろうけどな 飼い犬よしよし >>104
On January 27, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed
Executive Order No. 13769, Protecting the Nation From
Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. 82 Fed.
Reg. 8977 (EO?1). EO?1 addressed policies and procedures
relating to the entry of foreign nationals into thiscountry. Among other directives, the order suspended
entry of foreign nationals from seven countries identified
as presenting heightened terrorism risks?Iran, Iraq,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen?for 90 days.§3(c). Executive officials were instructed to review the
adequacy of current practices relating to visa adjudications
during this 90-day period. §3(a). EO?1 also modified
refugee policy, suspending the United States RefugeeAdmissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days and reducing
the number of refugees eligible to be admitted to the United
States during fiscal year 2017. §§5(a), (d).
EO?1 was immediately challenged in court. Just a week
after the order was issued, a Federal District Court entered
a nationwide temporary restraining order enjoining
enforcement of several of its key provisions. Washington
v. Trump, 2017 WL 462040 (WD Wash., Feb. 3, 2017). Six
days later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuitdenied the Government’s emergency motion to stay the
order pending appeal. Washington v. Trump, 847 F. 3d1151 (2017). Rather than continue to litigate EO?1, the
Government announced that it would revoke the order andissue a new one.A second order followed on March 6, 2017. See Protecting
>>105
the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the
United States, Exec. Order No. 13780, 82 Fed. Reg. 13209
(EO?2). EO?2 describes “conditions in six of the . . . coun-
Cite as: 582 U. S. ____ (2017) 3
Per Curiamtries” as to which EO?1 had suspended entry, stating that
these conditions “demonstrate [that] nationals [of those
countries] continue to present heightened risks to the
security of the United States,” §1(e), and that “some of
those who have entered the United States through ourimmigration system have proved to be threats to our
national security,” §1(h).Having identified these concerns, EO?2 sets out a series
of directives patterned on those found in EO?1. Several
are relevant here. First, EO?2 directs the Secretary of
Homeland Security to conduct a global review to determine
whether foreign governments provide adequateinformation about nationals applying for United States
visas. §2(a). EO?2 directs the Secretary to report his
findings to the President within 20 days of the order’s
>>106effective date,” after which time those nations identified
as deficient will be given 50 days to alter their practices.
§§2(b), (d)?(e).Second, EO?2 directs that entry of nationals from six of
the seven countries designated in EO?1?Iran, Libya,
Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen?be “suspended for 90
days from the effective date” of the order. §2(c). EO?2
explains that this pause is necessary to ensure that dangerous
individuals do not enter the United States while
the Executive is working to establish “adequate standards
. . . to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists”; in addition,
suspending entry will “temporarily reduce investigative
burdens on agencies” during the Secretary’s 20-dayreview. Ibid. A separate section provides for case-by-case
waivers of the entry bar. §3(c).
Third, EO?2 suspends “decisions on applications for
refugee status” and “travel of refugees into the United
States under the USRAP” for 120 days following its effective
date. §6(a). During that period, the Secretary of
State is instructed to review the adequacy of USRAP
application and adjudication procedures and implemen 14時手仕舞いで大口Sが利確したんだな
この後の続かなさは おし一旦下げたら追資だわ
これは.90近くまで戻る 昨日変な夢をみた
ドル円急落中に98円の全力Lをゲットしたかと思いきや
そこで止まらずに48円まで下落してしまってロスカットどころか口座に-9800万円と出て涙を流したらそこで目が覚めた >>106
とっくにNG入れてるから気づかんかった >>110
___A___
（_o_o_o.） ドル円
＿＿＿＿＿__ハ＿_＿ 50円
／ /
／ /60円
／ /
／ /
／ ./ 70円
___A___ ___A__,／ /
.（::::::::::::::） .（::::::::::::::） ./
）::::::::（ ,）:::::::（ /
／::::::::::::;＼ イ:::::::::::; ＼ /
// |:::::::::::: ｌ | ／//'|:::::::::::: ｌ | ./
| | .|:::::::::::: | | ／ // .|:::::::::::: | | ./
| | /:::::::::::/| | ／ .// ../:::::::::::/| |/
Ｕ |::::::::::/ U Ｕ |::::::::::/ .| |
|::::||:::|／| |∧_∧.| | |::::||:::| ,Ｕ
|::::||:::| |(ﾟДﾟii|l)/ |::::||:::|./
, .| /.|: | / / .| / | |
／ // | | /／| / .// .| |
U .U .U .U >>99
安西義光も無事に死亡しました(´･ω･`) TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
>>117
PROJECT
Per Curiam
whatever additional procedures are necessary “to ensurethat individuals seeking admission as refugees do not pose
a threat” to national security. Ibid.
Fourth, citing the President’s determination that “the
entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States,” EO?2 “suspend[s] any entries in excess of that
number” for this fiscal year. §6(b).
Finally, §14 of EO?2 establishes the order’s effective
date: March 16, 2017.
B>>108
Respondents in these cases filed separate lawsuitschallenging EO?2. As relevant, they argued that the order
violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
because it was motivated not by concerns pertaining
to national security, but by animus toward Islam. Theyfurther argued that EO?2 does not comply with certain
provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA),
66 Stat. 187, as amended.>>109
In No. 16?1436, a Federal District Court concluded thatrespondents were likely to succeed on their Establishment
Clause claim with respect to §2(c) of EO?2?the provision
temporarily suspending entry from six countries?andentered a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the
Government from enforcing §2(c) against any foreign
national seeking entry to the United States. International
Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___,2017 WL 1018235 (D Md., Mar. 16, 2017) (IRAP). The
District Court in No. 16?1540?likewise relying on the
Establishment Clause?entered a broader preliminaryinjunction: The court enjoined nationwide enforcement of
all of §§2 and 6. Hawaii v. Trump, ___ F. Supp. 3d ___,2017 WL 1167383 (D Haw., Mar. 29, 2017) (entering
preliminary injunction); ___ F. Supp. 3d ___, 2017 WL
1011673 (D Haw., Mar. 15, 2017) (entering temporary
Cite as: 582 U. S. ____ (2017) 5>>110
Per Curiamrestraining order). In addition to the §2(c) suspension of
entry, this injunction covered the §6(a) suspension ofrefugee admissions, the §6(b) reduction in the refugee cap,
and the provisions in §§2 and 6 pertaining only to internal
executive review.
These orders, entered before EO?2 went into effe>>111
ct,
prevented the Government from initiating enforcement of>>113
the challenged provisions. The Government filed appeals
in both cases.The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled first.
On May 25, over three dissenting votes, the en banc court
issued a decision in IRAP that largely upheld the order
enjoining enforcement of §2(c). 857 F. 3d 554. The majority
determined that respondent John Doe #1, a lawfulpermanent resident whose Iranian wife is seeking entry to
the United States, was likely to succeed on the merits of
his Establishment Clause claim. The majority concluded>>112
that the primary purpose of §2(c) was religious, in violationof the First Amendment: A reasonable observer familiar
with all the circumstances?including the predominantly
Muslim character of the designated countries andstatements made by President Trump during his Presidential
campaign?would conclude that §2(c) was motivated
principally by a desire to exclude Muslims from the
United States, not by considerations relating to national
security. Having reached this conclusion, the court upheldthe preliminary injunction prohibiting enforcement of
§2(c) against any foreign national seeking to enter this
country. >>110
何が起きたんだ？核戦争勃発か？仮想通貨にシェアを奪われたか？ >>110
紫ババアに取り憑かれたね
(｡･ω･｡) ここで買うアホまだおるんか
初心者が一生学ばないやつ 来年は円がらみの取引やめよう
円が絡むと意味不明な動きが多すぎる
ユーロ中心でいくぞい なるほどね
ビットコインがチューリップバブルと重なるとは上手く言ったもんだ 無職のオッサン共有食らって透明なっとるやん(・Д・) うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 犯罪者安倍晋三さっさと死ねやあああああああああああああああああああああああああああ portions of EO?2, they had not altered its effective
date, nor so much as mentioned §14. Thus, even though ithad never been enforced, the entry suspension would
>>129
On June 1, the Government filed a petition for certiorari
seeking review of the Fourth Circuit’s decision. It alsofiled applications seeking stays of both injunctions, including
the Hawaii injunction still pending before the Ninth
Circuit. In addition, the Government requested that thisCourt expedite the certiorari stage briefing. We accordingly
directed respondents to file responses to the stay appli-
>>122
6 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT
Per Curiam
cations by June 12 and respondents in IRAP to file a briefin opposition to the Government’s petition for certiorari by
>>125
the same day.
Respondents’ June 12 filings injected a new issue intothe cases. In IRAP, respondents argued that the suspension
of entry in §2(c) would expire on June 14. Section
2(c), they reasoned, directs that entry “be suspended for 90days from the effective date of ” EO?2. The “effective date”
of EO?2 was March 16. §14. Although courts had enjoined
expire 90 days from March 16: June 14. At that time, the
dispute over §2(c) would become moot. Brief in Opposition
13?14.
>>121
On the same day respondents filed, the Ninth Circuit
ruled in Hawaii. ___ F. 3d ___, 2017 WL 2529640 (June12, 2017) (per curiam). A unanimous panel held in favor
of respondents the State of Hawaii and Dr. Ismail Elshikh,
an American citizen and imam whose Syrian mother-inlaw
is seeking entry to this country. Rather than rely onthe constitutional grounds supporting the District Court’s
decision, the court held that portions of EO?2 likely exceeded
the President’s authority under the INA. On thatbasis it upheld the injunction as to the §2(c) entry suspension,
the §6(a) suspension of refugee admissions, and the
§6(b) refugee cap. The Ninth Circuit, like the FourthCircuit, concluded that the injunction should bar enforcement
of these provisions across the board, because they>>132
would violate the INA “in all applications.” Id., at *28.
The court did, however, narrow the injunction so that it
would not bar the Government from undertaking theinternal executive reviews directed by EO?2.
We granted the parties’ requests for supplemental briefing
addressed to the decision of the Ninth Circuit. Beforethose briefs were filed, however, the ground shifted On June 14, evidently in response to the argument that
§2(c) was about to expire, President Trump issued a memorandum
to Executive Branch officials. The memorandum
declared the effective date of each enjoined provision of
EO?2 to be the date on which the injunctions in these
cases “are lifted or stayed with respect to that provision.”
>>123
Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the
Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security,
and the Director of National Intelligence (June 14, 2017).
The memorandum further provided that, to the extent
necessary, it “should be construed to amend the Executive
Order.” Ibid. The Government takes the view that, if any
mootness problem existed previously, the President’s
memorandum has cured it. >>126
>>130
きっと先週の金曜日FIXの後にあった出来事が夢の中で膨らんだと思う 112.8まではあがるんだろ。112.9かもしれんがな！ 4時間足チャートを見てればＳなんてできないはず
完全に上昇トレンドのチャート あっそ。
( ﾟ∀ﾟ) ﾌﾟｩ
ノヽノ) =3'A`)ﾉ ﾋｬｰ
くく へﾍﾉ On June 14, evidently in response to the argument that
§2(c) was about to expire, President Trump issued a memorandum
to Executive Branch officials. The memorandum
declared the effective date of each enjoined provision of
EO?2 to be the date on which the injunctions in these
cases “are lifted or stayed with respect to that provision.”>>144
Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the
Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security,
and the Director of National Intelligence (June 14, 2017).
The memorandum further provided that, to the extent
necessary, it “should be construed to amend the Executive
Order.” Ibid. The Government takes the view that, if any>>145
mootness problem existed previously, the President’s
memorandum has cured it.The parties have since completed briefing, with the
Government requesting that we construe its supplemental
brief in Hawaii as a petition for certiorari. There is no
objection from respondents, and we do so. Both petitionsfor certiorari and both stay applications are accordingly
ripe for consideration.IIThe Government seeks review on several issues. In
IRAP, the Government argues that respondent Doe lacks
standing to challenge §2(c).* The Government also contends
that Doe’s Establishment Clause claim fails on the
merits. In its view, the Fourth Circuit should not have>>146
asked whether §2(c) has a primarily religious purpose.
The court instead should have upheld EO?2 because it
rests on the “facially legitimate and bona fide” justification
of protecting national security. Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408
??????*On June 24, 2017, this Court received a letter from counsel for Doe
advising that Doe’s wife received an immigrant visa on or about June
22, 2017. The parties may address the significance of that development
at the merits stage. It does not affect our analysis of the stay issues in
these cases.
8 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT
Per Curiam
U. S. 753, 770 (1972). In addition, the Fourth Circuit
erred by focusing on the President’s campaign-trail comments
to conclude that §2(c)?religiously neutral on its>>147
face?nonetheless has a principally religious purpose. At
the very least, the Government argues, the injunction is
too broad.In Hawaii, the Government likewise argues that respondents
Hawaii and Dr. Elshikh lack standing and that(at a minimum) the injunction should be narrowed. The
Government’s principal merits contention pertains to a
statutory provision authorizing the President to “suspend
the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” to this country“[w]henever [he] finds that the entry of any aliens or of
any class of aliens . . . would be detrimental to the interests
of the United States.” 8 U. S. C. §1182(f ). The Ninth
Circuit held that “[t]here is no sufficient finding in [EO?2]>>149>>150
>>156
that the entry of the excluded classes would be detrimentalto the interests of the United States.” Hawaii,
2017 WL 2529640, at *14. This, the Government argues,
constitutes impermissible judicial second-guessing of thePresident’s judgment on a matter of national security.
In addition to seeking certiorari, the Government asksthe Court to stay the injunctions entered below, thereby
permitting the enjoined provisions to take effect. According
to the Government, it is likely to suffer irreparable 110円台が呼んでるようなチャートだけど
スイング売りするのもまだ早いんだろうな 東山奈央[なおぼう]
10 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT
Per Curiam
decree to meet the exigencies of the particular case.”
Wright, supra, §2947, at 115.Here, of course, we are not asked to grant a preliminary
injunction, but to stay one. In assessing the lower courts’
exercise of equitable discretion, we bring to bear an equitable
judgment of our own. Nken v. Holder, 556 U. S. 418,
433 (2009). Before issuing a stay, “[i]t is ultimately necessary
. . . to balance the equities?to explore the relativeharms to applicant and respondent, as well as the interests
of the public at large.” Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc.
Group Hospital Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S.1301, 1305 (1991) (Scalia, J., in chambers) (internal quotation
marks omitted). This Court may, in its discretion,
tailor a stay so that it operates with respect to only “some
portion of the proceeding.” Nken, supra, at 428.The courts below took account of the equities in fashioning
interim relief, focusing specifically on the concrete
burdens that would fall on Doe, Dr. Elshikh, and Hawaii if§2(c) were enforced. They reasoned that §2(c) would “directlyaffec[t]
” Doe and Dr. Elshikh by delaying entry of
their family members to the United States. IRAP, 857F. 3d, at 585, n. 11; see Hawaii, 2017 WL 2529640, at *7?
*8, *24. The Ninth Circuit concluded that §2(c) wouldharm the State by preventing students from the designated
nations who had been admitted to the University of
Hawaii from entering this country. These hardships, the
courts reasoned, were sufficiently weighty and immediate
to outweigh the Government’s interest in enforcing §2(c).Having adopted this view of the equities, the courts approved
injunctions that covered not just respondents, but
To begin, we grant both of the Government’s petitions
for certiorari and consolidate the cases for argument. The
Clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule that will permit
the cases to be heard during the first session of October
Term 2017. (The Government has not requested that we
expedite consideration of the merits to a greater extent.)
In addition to the issues identified in the petitions, the
parties are directed to address the following question:
“Whether the challenges to §2(c) became moot on June 14,
2017.”>>163
B
We now turn to the preliminary injunctions barring
enforcement of the §2(c) entry suspension. We grant the
Government’s applications to stay the injunctions, to the
extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of §2(c) with
respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship
with a person or entity in the United States. We
leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place
with respect to respondents and those similarly situated,>>166
as specified in this opinion. See infra, at 11?12.Crafting a preliminary injunction is an exercise of discretion
and judgment, often dependent as much on theequities of a given case as the substance of the legal issues
it presents. See Winter v. Natural Resources Defense
Council, Inc., 555 U. S. 7, 20, 24 (2008); 11A C. Wright, AMiller, & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure §2948
(3d ed. 2013). The purpose of such interim equitable relief
is not to conclusively determine the rights of the parties,
University of Tex. v. Camenisch, 451 U. S. 390, 395 (1981),but to balance the equities as the litigation moves forward.
In awarding a preliminary injunction a court must also
“conside[r] . . . the overall public interest.” Winter, supra,at 26. In the course of doing so, a court “need not grant
the total relief sought by the applicant but may mold its
>>164
>>165 16時から下がっても
23時までまたあげて
23時からはダダ下げだった昨日
難しいすぎない？ 113こえたら即引退してやっからな
覚悟しておけよ
マジで >>175
ground that the exclusion violated their own FirstAmendment rights).
But the injunctions reach much further than that: Thealso bar enforcement of §2(c) against foreign nationals
abroad who have no connection to the United States at all.
The equities relied on by the lower courts do not balance
the same way in that context. Denying entry to such aforeign national does not burden any American party by
reason of that party’s relationship with the foreign national.
And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion>>171
in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant
hardship on the foreign national himself. See id., at 762
(“[A]n unadmitted and nonresident alien . . . ha[s] noconstitutional right of entry to this country”). So whatever
burdens may result from enforcement of §2(c) against a
foreign national who lacks any connection to this country,
they are, at a minimum, a good deal less concrete than the
hardships identified by the courts below.At the same time, the Government’s interest in enforcing
§2(c), and the Executive’s authority to do so, are undoubtedly
at their peak when there is no tie between theforeign national and the United States. Indeed, EO?2
itself distinguishes between foreign nationals who have
some connection to this country, and foreign nationals who
do not, by establishing a case-by-case waiver system primarily
for the benefit of individuals in the former category.>>168
See, e.g., §§3(c)(i)?(vi). The interest in preservingnational security is “an urgent objective of the highest
order.” Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U. S. 1,
28 (2010). To prevent the Government from pursuing that
objective by enforcing §2(c) against foreign nationalsunconnected to the United States would appreciably injure
its interests, without alleviating obvious hardship toanyone else.
We accordingly grant the Government’s stay applications
in part and narrow the scope of the injunctions as to
12 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT
Per Curiam
>>172
§2(c). The injunctions remain in place only with respect to
parties similarly situated to Doe, Dr. Elshikh, and Hawaii.In practical terms, this means that §2(c) may not be enforced
against foreign nationals who have a credible claimof a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the
United States. All other foreign nationals are subject to
the provisions of EO?2.The facts of these cases illustrate the sort of relationship
that qualifies. For individuals, a close familial relationship
is required. A foreign national who wishes to enterthe United States to live with or visit a family member,
like Doe’s wife or Dr. Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has
such a relationship. As for entities, the relationship must
be formal, documented, and formed in the ordinary course,
rather than for the purpose of evading EO?2. The students
from the designated countries who have been admitted
to the University of Hawaii have such a relationship>>169
>>173
with an American entity. So too would a worker whoaccepted an offer of employment from an American company
or a lecturer invited to address an American audience.
Not so someone who enters into a relationship simply
to avoid §2(c): For example, a nonprofit group devoted to
immigration issues may not contact foreign nationals from
the designated countries, add them to client lists, and then
secure their entry by claiming injury from their exclusion. 外人ちょいちょいレスしてんのなw
レスきたやつなんて言われてんの 112.8こえたらテンションあがるんやけどな！無理なん？ 英文なんかこんなところに張られても読めるやつなんていないし
＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|
｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - |
― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣
￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| />>179
In light of the June 12 decision of the Ninth Circuit
vacating the injunction as to §2(a), the executive review
directed by that subsection may proceed promptly, if it is
not already underway. EO?2 instructs the Secretary of
Homeland Security to complete this review within 20
days, after which time foreign governments will be given
50 days further to bring their practices into line with the
Secretary’s directives. §§2(a)?(b), (d). Given the Government’s
representations in this litigation concerning the
resources required to complete the 20-day review, we fully>>180
expect that the relief we>>182grant today will permit the Exec-
Cite as: 582 U. S. ____ (2017) 13
Per Curiam
utive to conclude its internal work and provide adequate
notice to foreign governments within the 90-day life of
§2(c).CThe Hawaii injunction extends beyond §2(c) to bar
enforcement of the §6(a) suspension of refugee admissions
and the §6(b) refugee cap. In our view, the equitable
balance struck above applies in this context as well. An
American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship
with a particular person seeking to enter thecountry as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship
if that person is excluded. As to these individuals
and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it
comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the
United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance
tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide
for the Nation’s security. See supra, at 9?11; Haig v.
Agee, 453 U. S. 280, 307 (1981).>>181
The Government’s application to stay the injunctionwith respect to §§6(a) and (b) is accordingly granted in
part. Section 6(a) may not be enforced against an individual
seeking admission as a refugee who can credibly claim
a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the
United States. Nor may §6(b); that is, such a person maynot be excluded pursuant to §6(b), even if the 50,000-
person cap has been reached or exceeded. As applied to all
other individuals, the provisions may take effect.
* * *
Accordingly, the petitions for certiorari are granted, andthe stay applications are granted in part.
It is so ordered. なんでだろう、なんでだろう
俺がポジると逆行するのなんでだろう
なんでだろう、なんでだろう
俺がポジると建値で揉むのなんでだろう SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Nos. 16?1436 (16A1190) and 16?1540 (16A1191)
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL.>>184
No. 16?1436 (16A1190) v.
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL.No. 16?1540 (16A1191) v.
HAWAII, ET AL.ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[June 26, 2017] JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE ALITO and
JUSTICE GORSUCH join, concurring in part and dissenting
in part.
I agree with the Court that the preliminary injunctionsentered in these cases should be stayed, although I would
stay them in full. The decision whether to stay the injunctions
is committed to our discretion, ante, at 9?10, but ourdiscretion must be “guided by sound legal principles,”
Nken v. Holder, 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009) (internal quotation
marks omitted). The two “most critical” factors wemust consider in deciding whether to grant a stay are
“(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing
that [it] is likely to succeed on the merits” and“(2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured
THOMAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part
2 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT
Opinion of THOMAS, J.absent a stay.” Ibid. (internal quotation marks omitted).
Where a party seeks a stay pending certiorari, as here, the
applicant satisfies the first factor only if it can show both
>>185
“a reasonable probability that certiorari will be granted”and “a significant possibility that the judgment below will
be reversed.” Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital
Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S. 1301, 1302 (1991)(Scalia, J., in chambers). When we determine that those
critical factors are satisfied, we must “balance the equities”
by “explor[ing] the relative harms to applicant and
respondent, as well as the interests of the public at large.”Id., at 1304?1305 (internal quotation marks omitted); cf.
Nken, supra, at 435 (noting that the factors of “assessing
the harm to the opposing party and weighing the public
interest” “merge when the Government is the opposingparty”).
The Government has satisfied the standard for issuing a
stay pending certiorari. We have, of course, decided to
grant certiorari. See ante, at 8?9. And I agree with theCourt’s implicit conclusion that the Government has made
a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits?that
is, that the judgments below will be reversed.>>186
The Government has also established that failure to staythe injunctions will cause irreparable harm by interfering
with its “compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”
Ante, at 13. Finally, weighing the Government’s
interest in preserving national security against the hardshipscaused to respondents by temporary denials of entry
into the country, the balance of the equities favors the
Government. I would thus grant the Government’s applicationsfor a stay in their entirety. >>184
わかる
ポジった瞬間にスプが広がったり値動きが荒くなる
人工知能って恐ろしいっすね >>119
. ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) 安西さああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああん。
昨日の値動きはﾛﾝｶﾞｰもｼｮｰﾀｰも殺す値動きやったね。 >>193
ヤクザタイムで一旦上がるのでは？と
なんの根拠もなく期待してます。 Opinion of THOMAS, J.tional step of keeping the injunctions in place with regard
to an unidentified, unnamed group of foreign nationals
abroad. No class has been certified, and neither partyasks for the scope of relief that the Court today provides.
“[I]njunctive relief should be no more burdensome to thedefendant than necessary to provide complete relief to the
plaintiffs” in the case, Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U. S.682, 702 (1979) (emphasis added), because a court’s role is
“to provide relief ” only “to claimants . . . who have suffered,
or will imminently suffer, actual harm.” Lewis v.Casey, 518 U. S. 343, 349 (1996). In contrast, it is the role
of the “political branches” to “shape the institutions ofgovernment in such fashion as to comply with the laws
and the Constitution.” Ibid.Moreover, I fear that the Court’s remedy will prove
unworkable. Today’s compromise will burden executive
officials with the task of deciding?on peril of contempt?>>194
>>192
Reasonable minds may disagree on where the balance of
equities lies as between the Government and respondents
in these cases. It would have been reasonable, perhaps,
for the Court to have left the injunctions in place only as
to respondents themselves. But the Court takes the addi-
THOMAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part
Cite as: 582 U. S. ____ (2017) 3>>193
:::.ゝ 抜 美
前 ﾉ::::::::::::::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,>>878-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|>>191
｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿
＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-
◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)>>883
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀
ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cA
R0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,
/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
whether individuals from the six affected nations whowish to enter the United States have a sufficient connection
to a person or entity in this country. See ante, at 11?12. The compromise also will invite a flood of litigation
until this case is finally resolved on the merits, as parties>>195
and courts struggle to determine what exactly constitutes
a “bona fide relationship,” who precisely has a “credibleclaim” to that relationship, and whether the claimed
relationship was formed “simply to avoid §2(c)” of Executive
Order No. 13780, ante, at 11, 12. And litigation of thefactual and legal issues that are likely to arise will presumably
be directed to the two District Courts whoseinitial orders in these cases this Court has now?
unanimously?found sufficiently questionable to be stayed
as to the vast majority of the people potentially affected. うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 浅野忠信の父(68)覚醒剤で逮捕w
68でポン中とか本物過ぎだろw 今週は調子悪い
流れは当てているが、値幅が違いすぎる >>208
６８歳なら好きにさせたら良いのにねw
最強薬物のシンナーとかw ニ豚声豚基地外
l
￣( ）y ） /l i
l l Y''/ー'
US district judge in Virginia has ruled that President Donald Trump's executive order barring entry from seven countries is unconstitutional.
Judge Leonie Brinkema issued a preliminary injunction, asserting that the campaign vow to institute a "Muslim ban" violated the First Amendment.
The Monday ruling is significant,
as the judge ruled that religious bias is at the heart of Mr Trump's ban.
Judges elsewhere have already upheld an order stopping implementation.
The First Amendment prohibits the government from establishing laws that favour one religion over another.
Who is affected by the travel ban?
What did the California court rule?>>201
Legal limbo in a Virginia airport
Earlier this month an appeals court upheld a lower court's decision to bar the federal government from beginning
「￣￣了
l h「￢丨 ＜日本語くらいわかれよア
屑ニートのID:RH
7HOye50r 22-page ruling, the Virginia judge cited several of Mr Trump's campaign statements including those in which he promised to create a "Muslim ban" if he were elected president.
"Graphic showing checks and balances on US government
Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who argued the case against the ban, praised the judge's decision saying
"the overwhelming evidence shows that this ban was conceived in religious bigotry".
The te
>>203>>206
／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿
／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ
/ ／∧ / /
/.i l iー――‐u'￣
./ ／ Д｀ / / / / l l
i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ'
l l
. / _/ ＼ !、The president himself acknowledged the conceptual link between a Muslim ban and the EO (executive order)," Judge Brinkema wrote.
She also criticised the president's statements that persecuted Christians may be permitted entry despite the ban, which she said amounts to a religious test.
She also referenced a Fox News interview in which former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a Trump adviser, said that the president wants a "Muslim ban"
and that he had been instructed by Mr Trump to put together a commission to determine "the right way to do it legally".
Judge Brinkema sharply criticised lawyers for the justice department, who she said did not present any evidence except for the president's executive order.
"Maximum power does not mean absolute power," she wrote. "Every presidential action must still comply with the limits set" by the separation of powers laid out in the US Constitution.
lヽ＿＿＿_」 l
. !、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./
ﾄ、＿_＼/ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y l>>204
/ .l l
!、 l l./ / l l
/ / l/ ,/ i'
/_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」
L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」
`ー' `ヽ＿」
implementation of the ban, which temporarily prohibits travel from seven Muslim-majority countries, and indefinitely suspends the refugee admissions programme.
In hemporary injunction applies only to residents of Virginia and faculties of state universities who may have been affected by the new travel restrictions.
The case was brought to the court in Alexandria, Virginia, on behalf of two Yemeni brothers
who were turned away from the US shortly after arriving at Dulles International Airport.
The Yemeni men have since been allowed to enter the United States.
Mr Trump has said that he is considering rewriting the executive order, rather than bring the case to the Supreme Court. >>215
昨日の窓を埋めると思ったが、すぐには無理そう トランプになってから相場の難易度上がりすぎなんだよぼけ 外出から戻ったら＋20ピプスぐらいになっていた 出かけるときが４５ぐらいだったか >>219
下目線だったけど、自信なくなった
上か下かわからない 偶然かもしれないが昨日は雲の上限タッチ寸前から落ち始めたからな ヤンキーはより動かせる余地のある方に、阿吽の呼吸で皆で突っ込んで動かして
ロスカを狙って利ざやを取る。昨日は下。
今日は行き過ぎなければ上。112.9超えてNYに渡るようだと今日も下。 レンジなら23ヶ月以内には窓あろうがなかろうがこの辺りは絶対通るんだからそりゃいつかは窓埋めするわな
とんでもないとこの窓以外は窓は埋まるなんて当たり前の話だわ >>241
(''ω'')ノ ｺｲｺｲｺｲｺｲ ｷﾀﾗｲｲﾅ 監査前日なのに、職場のプリンターが壊れた。
最悪です。 >>209
昨日の夜の112.85と112.90のLの10枚ずつのエアポジはどう整理したことになってるの？ 窓が開いたら閉める事が多いってのは統計的にも事実だと思うが
窓が開いたらそれを閉めるために相場が動いてると考えてる奴は
救い様がないお花畑だと思う じあり上がってた日経ももういっぱいいっぱな感じ臭いな
引けで落ちんのかな >>256
112.76で損切りした
昨日書いたよ
2万円位損した >>258
それよりも今日はOPカットだ
112.00 大きめOP
これに窓を利用される感じじゃないか？ 金は一応反転しそうなんだがなぁ…ポンドルが1.353で天丼臭い動きしてる割にポン円は152.3抜けちゃってるからドル円は静観w
本来ならポンド系にここまで引き攣られる事もねーはずなんだが東京が糞ボラすぎる ここ数日でやっと少しだけ勝てました。。。今年に入って見事にハズしてました。。。そして気が付けば一年が終わります。私もトランプさんになってから散々です。 French President Emmanuel Macron has told Donald Trump he is "concerned"
the US leader could unilaterally recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
Any decision on the contested city's status must be "within the framework
of negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians", Mr Macron said.
Earlier, similar warnings came from a number of Arab and Muslim nations.
Reports say the US president will recognise Jerusalem as Israel's capital this week.
Both Israelis and Palestinians claim the city as their capital.
French President Emmanuel Macron (left) and US President Donald
Trump in Paris. Photo: July 2017Image copyrightAFP/GETTY IMAGES
Image caption
President Macron telephoned his US counterpart to express concern, the Elysee palace said
The White House said Mr Trump would miss Monday's deadline to sign
a waiver delaying the relocation of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
But White House spokesman Hogan Gidley stressed that "the president has been
clear on this issue from the get-go: It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when".
Every president, including Mr Trump, has signed the waiver every six months since
US Congress passed an act in 1995 calling for the embassy to be moved.
What's so contentious about the move?
The status of Jerusalem goes to the heart of Israel's conflict with the Palestinians,
who are backed by the rest of the Arab and wider Islamic world.
The city is home to key religious sites sacred to Judaism, Islam and Christianity,
especially in East Jerusalem.
Map of Jerusalem
Israel occupied the area in the 1967 Middle East war and regards the entire city
as its indivisible capital.
The Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as the capital of a future state, and according to
Israel-Palestinian peace accords, its final status is meant to be discussed in the latter stages of peace talks.
Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem has never been recognised internationally, and all countries
, including Israel's closest ally the US, maintain their embassies in Tel Aviv.
The alternatives to a two-state solution
Why settlement issue is so difficult
Since 1967, Israel has built a dozen settlements, home to about 200,000 Jews, in East Jerusalem.
These are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.
If the US recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital, it will put it out-of-step with the rest of the international
community and reinforce Israel's position that settlements in the east are valid Israeli communities. 今のメイン材料な何？
ロシアゲート？税制？利上げ？オレ？ 年末 超円安のフロー出るかと思ったけどこの調子だと111-113で
うろうろですかね。 >>270
トンキンが作ったショートを
どう料理するかじゃね？ そうか4時間足がもうすぐ終わるんだ 抵抗線もあるし利確下げしそうなところだな うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 下だああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ ふむ。これで完全に113は行かなくなったね。
みてな、今日の天井はここやで
間違いなく今日111.4までおちるから >>264
ご指摘の様な相場が窓を閉める側に動く理由があるから結果的に窓が閉まるだけで
このスレには窓を閉めるために相場が動くと勘違いしてる奴がたくさんいる
まあ、何をどう信じようと個人の勝手なんだが うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
ユロルはもう下がってきてるぞｗ 日笠陽子[ひよっち] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 06:01:09.08 >>284
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ ＿＿＿＿
The group says there are 12 settlements in East Jerusalem, inhabited by about 200,000 settlers.
Israel also established settlements in the Gaza Strip, seized from Egypt in the 1967 war, but it dismantled
them when it withdrew from the territory in 2005. It also built settlements in the Sinai Peninsula, seized too
from Egypt in 1967, but removed them in 1982 as part of a peace agreement with Cairo.
There are also dozens of settlements on the occupied Golan Heights, captured from Syria in the 1967 war.
Built-up settlement areas occupy abo
ut 2% of the West Bank but critics point out that the land controlled by
settlement activity, such as agriculture and roads, amounts to much more than that and requires heavy military presence.
Settlers themselves choose to live in these communities for a range of reasons - from economic, encouraged
by government subsidies, to religious, based on the belief that God gave the land to the Jewish people.
Why are settlements so contentious?
W .／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
The issue of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem has long been a major sourc
e of dispute between Israel and the Palestinians, and most of the international community.
Here is a brief guide to what it is all about.
What are settlements?>>270
Settlements are communities established by Israel on land occupied in the 1967 Middle East war.
This includes the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. The West Bank and
East Jerusalem had previously been occupied by Jordan since the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War.
According to the Israeli settlement watchdog Peace Now, there are 131 settlements in the West Bank,
housing about 385,000 Israeli Jewish settlers, and 97 outposts - settlements built without official authorisation.
West Bank settlements map
on>>271
There are dozens of unauthorised settlements, known as outposts, across the West Bank
What happens with settlements has proven to be one of the most intractable issues between Israel and the
Palestinians, and rows about them have caused the collapse of numerous rounds of peace talks.
Palestinians say the presence of settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - land they seek for a
future state - make such a state with contiguous territory impossible. They have demanded Israel freeze all settlement activity as a precondition for resuming peace talks.
Palestinians' freedom of movement is also restricted by hundreds of checkpoints, roadblocks and other obstacles used to protect both settlements and Israel from militants.
Israel says the Palestinians are using the issue of settlements as a pretext to avoid direct talks
. It says settlements are not a genuine obstacle to peace and are negotiable.
Under the 1993 Israel-Palestinian Oslo peace accords, the issue of settlements was to be deferred
until final status talks - a reason why Israel objects to pre-conditions and UN resolutions on the matter.
Will things change under Donald Trump?
Israelis sit outside cafe in front of screen showing Donald TrumpImage copyrightAFP
Image caption>>272
Donald Trump's presidency could mean unfettered settlement-building>>274
>>275
Almost certainly. President Trump has declared strong support for Israel and signalled a much more tolerant attitude
towards settlement activity than his predecessor, Barack Obama. Mr Trump appointed an ambassador to Israel who is a staunch settlement supporter.
The settler movement enthusiastically welcomed Mr Trump's election, and the pro-settler government, emboldened b うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 一目の雲だけど、あれ先行スパン1を抜くのはそんなに難しくなくて
重視されるべき線は先行スパン2なんだってな 月収100億バイナリーユーチューバー「雲使ってるヤツは初心者🔰」 東山奈央[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
Israel says it is legally there as a result of a defensive war, and did not take control of the West Bank from a legitimate sovereign power.
It says the legal right of Jewish settlement there as recognised by the 1922 League of Nations Mandate for Palestine was preserved under the UN's charter.
Up until Donald Trump took office, the US had described the settlements as "illegitimate"
, refraining from calling them "illegal" since the Carter administration in 1980.
A UN Security Council resolution in December 2016 said settlements had "no legal validity and constitute[d] a flagrant violation under international law".
However, like previous resolutions on Israel, those adopted under Chapter VI of the
What makes Jerusalem a special case?
Har Homa settlementImage copyrightAFP
Image caption
Israel does not regard places like Har Homa in East Jerusalem as settlements
>>293
Even if agreement could be reached on settlements in the West Bank, the issue of settlements in East Jerusalem is even more thorny.
Israel regards East Jerusalem as its eternal, indivisible capital and does not consider
the sector in any way occupied - and by extension, it does not regard Jewish neighbourhoods there as settlements.
East Jerusalem map
Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, in a move not recognised internationally.
While it has previously agreed to temporarily freeze settlement-building in the West Bank,
it has ruled out a similar halt in East Jerusalem.
So is a deal on settlements impossible?>>288
Remains of the former Gaza Strip Jewish settlement of Netzarim, which was destroyed by
the Israeli army before its withdrawal in 2005 (24 January 2006)Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
＿＿＿＿
Israel demolished its settlements in Gaza before it withdrew in 2005
Not necessarily, despite appearing insurmountable. Israel has said it is prepared to make "painful concessions"
for peace, and it has previously shown it will relinquish settlements - such as in Sinai and Gaza, and four small sites in the West Bank in 2005.
It has agreed to negotiate the fate of existing settlements, and Jerusalem, as part of permanent status talks.
Israel has said in any final deal it intends to keep the largest settlement blocs, which are close to the pre-1967 ceasefire line.
This position seemed to get the endorsement of the US under former President George W Bush, who,
in a letter to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2004, said it was "unrealistic" to expect a full withdrawal from the West Bank in a final peace deal.
Opinion among Israeli Jews on whether to withdraw from settlements is fairly even.
According to a June 2016 poll, 43% said they would support pulling out from all but the major settlement blocs
as part of a peace agreement with the Palestinians, as opposed to 46% who said they would vote against a withdrawal.
>>291
However, the current Israeli coalition government strongly supports the settler movement and there have been calls
by some political figures to annex parts of the West Bank rather than withdraw.
Are settlements illegal under international law?
UN Security Council votes for Resolution 2334 (23/12/16)Image copyrightAFP
Image caption
Israel and the UN have repeatedly clashed over the issue of settlements
>>292
Most of the international community, including the UN and the International Court of Justice, say the settlements are illegal.
The basis for this is the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention which forbids the transfer by an occupying power of its people into occupied territory.
However, Israel says the Fourth Geneva Convention does not apply de jure to the West Bank because, it says, the territory is not technically occupied.
UN Charter are not legally binding. 雲なんか移動平均線でも事足りるもんな(´・ω・`) いつの間にか阿倍死ねがいなくなったかわりに外人がいるのね ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
>>292
一番大事なのは、遅行 切り番でポジション持つの良くないのかな？
なんか切り番辺りは振り落とし攻撃される印象 重要なことに気づいた
取り引きしなかったら金減らない >>308
ヤクザそういうときでもすごい買ったりするしな
正直言うとわからん俺は >>298
俺も初心者の頃に指標で一撃死したのを見て一目とか何の価値もないと思った 東京で作られたポジはショートだろうから
適当に殺しにくるだろ 月初から3万を元手にレバ25で千円の利益ってすごいの？？ 安倍しね君はプロだからな
地合いが強い時だけしか出て来ない
俺は彼を一番信用してるサインだ なにがあるんや？ていうくらい60から動かんな(´・ω・`) 一目とか雲とかごちゃごちゃ表示してたら何かには被るからな
そんなんで勝てたら億トレ続出だわ
逆にそんなの見てたらブレイクに乗り遅れる 外人はトランプエルサレムリスクオフで全部売れと言いたいのだな？ 日経支え消えたな笑
あとはおちるだけ目指すは110.8 The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers
of wking of all institutions devoted to the care and education of children.
The Occupying Power shall take all necessary steps to facilitate the identification of children and the registration of
t
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.>>305
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security
of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement
of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons
it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes
as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.>>307
>>317
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent,
that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected
in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
heir parentage. It may not, in any case, change their personal status, nor enlist them in formations or organizations subordinate to it.
Should the local institutions be inadequate for the purpose, the Occupying Power shall make arrangements for the
maintenance and education, if possible by persons of their own nationality, language and religion, of children
who are orphaned or separated from their parents as a result of the war and who cannot be adequately cared for by a near relative or friend.
A special section of the Bureau set up in accordance with Article 136 [ Link ] shall be responsible for taking
all necessary steps to identify children whose identity is in doubt. Particulars of their parents or other near relatives should always be recorded if available.
The Occupying Power shall not hinderof any preferential measures in regard to food, medical
care and protection against the effects of war, which may have been adopted prior to the occupation in favour
of children under fifteen years, expectant mothers, and mothers of children under seven years.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to serve>>308
in its armed or auxiliary forces. No pressure or propaganda which aims at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to work unless they are over eighteen years of age,
and then only on work which is necessary either for the needs of the army of occupation, or for the public utility
services, or for the feeding, sheltering, clothing, transportation or health of the population of the occupied country.
Protected persons may not be compelled to undertake any work which would involve them in the obligation of taking part in military operations.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to employ forcible means to ensure the security
of the installations where they are performing compulsory labour.>>310
The work shall be carried out only in the occupied territory where the persons whose services have been requisitioned are. > もっと根拠に基づいたお祈りをしろよ！！
よっしゃ分かった。
不動金縛りの法！
オンキリキリバサラウンバッタ カァッ。 >>304
遅行スパンは今回の定期下げでその価値を思い知った
昨日はちょっとずれたけど26時間ごとに下げて来るんだもんな >>328
肉とドル円の連動はトンキンタイムだけだよ
ここからは10年債が9割 >>314
日足ぐらいならなんとか使えると思うけどな。
８ｈ以下はだめだわ。トレンド転換の頃合いになる指標や一部通信社において
遅行も先行も雲もも抵抗にもサポートにもならん。
平穏に動いてる時は使えるとは思うけど、テクニカル信じてトレードしてると
損切りやドテンがやりにくくなるのが最悪。 ずっと座ってるから痔になりそう
体動かした方がいいな >>280
もしやそれは退場をマイルドに言っているのでは… そろそろ円が安くならないと困る人たちが押し寄せる時間帯ですね おまえらみたいな何万人というガイジがこの為替を支えてるんだな トレードのやり方によって見るものなんか全部違うわ。
8h足だけ見てスキャが出来るんか 下に行きたがっている様に見えるけど無理くり跳ね上げてるなあ 一部通信ヘッドライン相場ではテクニカルなど何の役にも立たん
突然来るしかも絶妙なタイミングでな まずレンジ抜けてくれないと
おはなしになりませんね ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
じわじわ、きてるやん
１１３円超えてくるで・・
>>343
Investments in the territories and the lack of resources for socioeconomic problems besetting
deprived areas and disadvantaged populations. (The investment in the territories comes at the
expense of budgets for deprived areas and disadvantaged populations?45%; there is no
connection between the two?49%.) In the Arab public, a two-thirds majority considers that
2
the investments in the territories have detracted from investments in deprived areas and
disadvantaged populations.
＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤
｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ>>343
| ヽ｀- ○- ´
We asked: “Some claim that over the years Israeli governments have invested many
resources and monies in developing the Jewish settlements and infrastructures in the West
Bank/Judea and Samaria, and previously also in Gaza, at the expense of other areas and
populations in Israel that are disadvantaged and would have needed these resources and
budgets. Others claim that there is no connection between the two because one does not
come at the expense of the other. With which claim do you agree?” Here the Jewish public is
divided, with a slight advantage for those who say there is no connection between
／ ヽ |
∩ 人｀､ _
| ＿.- ´ | .| ＼>>344
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣
￣ ノノ ＼
The impact on Israel’s situation of the developments since the Six Day War: Both the
Jewish public and the Arab public are divided, in very similar proportions, between those
who think the developments in the territories have improved Israel’s security situation and
those who believe they have worsened it (Jews: improved?44%, worsened?43%; Arabs:
improved?48%, worsened?49%). As for the diplomatic situation, a majority (57%) in both
t 1 |´ |￣―--―
― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣
} | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| />>346
良い歳して声優の野水伊織さんの浴衣姿やエッチな衣装姿で抜きまくってる哀れなハム信者で基地外ニート( ゜∀゜)o彡゜With the fiftieth anniversary of the Six Day War approaching, this month the Peace Index
survey mostly explored the public’s positions on the war’s ramifications for the situation
today and in the future. In light of the recent referendum in Britain, we also looked into the
public’s views on a possible referendum in Israel on the future of the territories, along with
their preferences were such a referendum to be conducted. In addition, we inquired into what
the public thinks of the agreement between Israel and Turkey.
he Jewish public and the Arab public sees the developments in the West Bank/Judea and
Samaria as having worsened Israel’s situation.
| - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
The settlements and the national interest: We opened with a general question: “Sometime
after the Six Day War the settlement enterprise began to develop. In your opinion, from a
perspective of 50 years later, has the settlement enterprise contributed to or damaged Israel’s
national interest?” We found that a majority (52%) of the Jewish public thinks the settlement
enterprise has contributed to the national interest. More concretely, we gauged the public’s
views on how the investment in the settlements has affected the national resource allocation.
i 元のバーを整理して見やすくするのがインジ。
流れ、簡易なSR(確率・参照率）
を提供して元のチャートの助けになるなら何でも言い。
まぁインジ主体でもかてるのかもしれんけどね。 ABCニュースの誤報でガラッたの拾って儲かったけどさ
あんな誤報だいしといて何か処分ないのか
あれで世の中には数千万数億円飛ばした奴もいるだろうに 相場の空気が変わる瞬間をちゃんと読み取れるかどうかが大事
チャートで読める場合もあるし読めないこともある
一瞬で5ぴぴ上がったのがサインの場合はティック足か10秒足でもないと読めない >>360
そんなへたくそこの板にはおらんやろ
だってここにいる人はうまい人ばかりだから お前らの上がるように見えないは
当てにならねえわｗ ピコ指標
スキャの調子が良い→デイトレ予想逆行
悪い→順行
これめちゃ当たるで >>339
一目は見直したけど、これで儲かるってレベルには行ってないな
何だかんだでMACD見ながら取引してるし >>362
ワシのロケット１発どうや？気持ちええで？
彡 ⌒ ﾐ
(.´･ω･')
/ ヽ
| | ･ ･.||
| | .,,;,. ||
{ii｀ i.ニニつ
j / |. |
|. | | | >>358
FXは先物みたいなもんだし、そんな投機ギャンブルに世の中が責任保つ必要はないだろ。
数ヶ月や年の単位で株や通貨を投資として握る人には、投機の動きも、一部通信社もノイズでしかないし。 >>370
今日は90ストップの売りが刈られるってことかｗ したがってインジケーターの提供する図柄等が実際効果が
あるのか分かってないといけない。これはバーを見て検証したり
バックテストする。 最適化したら相場が変わると効果が薄れるが
そこは自分で調整する（狂ってると判断する能力が要る） 世界中のトレーダーが同じレートの動きを見ているはずなのに
考えて方は違うんだもんな(´・ω・`) これフランクフルトの早出が来るまでヨコヨコかもね
朝メシ食って昼寝しよ 少しの間チャート見ないで再びみたときに全然動いてないと少し得した気分になるよね？ 東山奈央[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
We wanted to know how much the Israeli public is factually aware of the situation in the
territories:
What is the Green Line? We asked: “In your opinion, is the following sentence true or not
true: the Green Line is the Israeli border that was set in the Armistice Agreements that were
signed at the end of the War of Independence between Israel and the Arab armies in 1949.”
>>358
The responses show that a bit less than half of the Jewish public are sure (15%) or think
(33%) that this definition is right, while 39% are sure or think that it is not (13% did not
know or declined to answer). That is, only a very small minority of the Jewish public now
>>359
knows for certain what the Green Line is! However, it turned out that a clear majority (63%)
of the Arab interviewees knew what the Green Line is, of whom 42% were sure of it.
What is the size of the Jewish population and of the Palestinian population in the
territories? A majority of the Jewish public also does not know for sure the size of the
Jewish or of the Palestinian population in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria. We asked how
many Jews live in these territories
(not counting the neighborhoods of expanded Jerusalem
such as Gilo or Pisgat Ze’ev). About one-fourth gave an underestimation of 100,000-
250,000, 30% answered correctly that the number is 250,000-500,000, 13% gave an
overestimation of 500,000-750,000, 3% thought the correct number was 750,000 to a
million, and about one-fourth did not know at all. Regarding the Palestinian population (not
counting Jerusalem), the estimates were: 24%?half a million to a million, 36%?one to two
million, only 10%?two million to three million (the accepted evaluation in Israel), 3%?
over three million. The rest (again 27%) did not know. That is, the Jewish public
underestimates the size of the Palestinian population in the territories. It turns out, then, that
the Jewish public’s assessments of the current situation in the territories, and of what will
happen in the future, are based to a large extent on a lack of knowledge of the facts and on
incorrect estimates of the relative sizes of the populations there.
>>360
This lack of knowledge is linked with a very high rate of Jewish Israelis who have not
stepped foot in the territories in recent years.
Frequency of visits/trips in the territories: Among those who answered that they do not
live in the territories and do not have family members there, 52% responded that they had
3
not visited or taken a trip in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria during the last five years.
Thirty-three percent said they had visited or taken a trip there once in a while, while only
13.5% responded that they had visited or taken a trip there frequently.
>>363
From there we moved on to the future, first of all regarding the recent referendum in Britain
as an example of a country’s fateful decision that was left to the public to make.
Would it be desirable to hold a referendum on the issue of leaving the territories?
A
majority of the Jews (59%) and an even larger majority of the Arabs (73%) would favor
holding a referendum on the issue of leaving the territories if, in the future, there were to be
progress in talks with the Palestinians leading to a draft peace agreement that would be
acceptable to the Israeli government. 112.4と113のレンジなんだから
好きなとこで
リカクしたらいい！ 上抜けはありえないＳで間違いない
俺が113でエル捕まってるからそうに決まってるよクソ 俺は最終的にローソク足と水平線やぞゾーンだけになった
MAさえも表示してない
まあインジコテコテでも勝てる人いるので自分に合うのが良いんじゃない
一目なんて俺には難しすぎてわけわかめだわｗ >>374
でもそれOKならどこかのファンドと通信社が組んで相場動かしても
全然OKってことにならないか？ チャートはシンプルにした方が勝てるよな
ラインとmaしか使ってないけど
50万が5万になったよ さあて、友の会の入会準備でもするか
(´・V・｀) >>390
材料ないと不可能だろう
113より111の方が近い(笑)112なんかスルーや ロスカットをもっとポジティブな言葉で表現しようぜ。
何かない？
おっさんくさいのはダメな。
勇気ある撤退みたいなw チャートなんて平均足しか表示してないわ
相場はしょせん「強気」か「弱気」あるいは互角の3パターンしかない
これを平均足で測るわけだ。
強気の時は買い、弱気の時は売る、互角の時は様子見だな
俺はこの強弱気投資法で250万を15万にした close to half of the
public (48%) considers that Britain’s exit from the EU, or Brexit, will not have an effect one
way or the other, 17% think Brexit will strengthen the EU’s intention to pressure Israel, 11%
believe it will weaken it, and 24% do not know. Among the Arabs a clear majority (65%)
thinks that the situation regarding pressure on Israel will not change if Britain leaves the EU.
And
Voting if a referendum were to be held in Israel today on the question of leaving the
territories: We asked: “If a referendum were to be held in Israel today on whether, in
principle, it is desirable to remain, as at present, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria or to
leaifferent distribution, almost even, would emerge if the Jewish public were to vote in a
referendum in a situation where a draft agreement with the Palestinians was on the table. At
present, 46% say they would vote against a withdrawal from the West Bank/Judea and
「￣￣了
l h「￢丨 ＜日本
語くらい
わかれよアニ
ve it while retaining the large settlement blートのID:RH7
HOye50ocs, how would you vote?” A majority (52%)
of the Jewish interviewees reported that in the豚基地 existing situation they would vote against a
withdrawal, while 36% answered that they would vote in favor. Among the Arabs a majority
(69%) said that if a referendum were to be held today, they would vote in favor of leaving
the territories while retaining the large settlement blocs.
Voting if there were to be a referendum based on a draft peace agreement: A slightly
d
外屑ニ
／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿
／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ
/ ／∧ / / /.i l iー――‐u'￣
./ ／ Д｀ / /
/ / l l
i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ' l l
. / _/ ＼ !、 lヽ＿＿＿_」 l
.about half of the Jewish public (51%) thinks that in such a referendum, if it were to be held,
all the citizens of the country would be entitled to participate. A large minority (44%)
believe that only the Jewish citizens of the country would be entitled to participate in it.
4
Will Britain’s exit from the EU affect the EU’s policy? On how the British referendum
will affect the EU’s intention to pressure Israel on the Palestinian issue, what is the likely situation in the territories in the future? The prevailing view
!、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./
ﾄ、＿_＼/
ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y l
l ￣( ）y ） /l
i
l l Y''/ー' / .l l
!、 l l./ / l l
/ / l/
,/ i'
/_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」
L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」
`ー' `ヽ＿」Samaria, whereas 43% say they would vote in favor. Among the Arabs, the rate of voters
favoring a withdrawal w豚声ould exceed three-fourths.
Who would be entitled to participate in a referendum on the future of the territories?
In a democratic country all citizens are entitled to participate in a referendum. However, only
among the Jewish public (37.5%) is that the situation will continue as it is. Twenty percent
hold the view that the international community will force Israel to withdraw to the 1967
borders. An identical rate thinks Israel will annex the territories without giving the
Palestinians equal rights to those of the Israelis, and 9% anticipate that Israel will annex the
territories and grant equal rights to the Palestinians. In the Arab public the most common
assessment (45%) is that the situation will remain as it is. ／ミ彡三三ミ､
/彡彡ｿヾミ三ミミヽ
∥彡'''｀ ｀`ヾミﾊ
{彡ｿ ,,ｨ≦ ｨ≧､ Ｙミ}
ﾘ彡 ,.ｨｭ: i .ｨｭ､. Ｙﾘ
ﾊﾘ ´` ノ ヽ` ' ﾘﾊ
Ｙ l /.‐ ‐ ''ｿ
ヽ_ ｨ‐.v→ .::/
ﾍ , ..::::/
} ｀ - -'.:/
_,.ノ| r‐ ⌒ヽ
,.へ ,ｒ''´ ⌒ l
{三ヽ ｛ 、 i ,_, 彡i |
V三ト､{ ﾄ ノミ;," }、 ,ｲ
V三三ﾄ､√ / ヾ i
V三三三＼ ミ / ', ﾐ;
V三三三三＼ / } l
V三三三三三ﾄY l l
|;V三三三三三l | ,'
l三V三三三三｝ l ,'
|三 }三三三三’ ,.ﾉ .,'
|三/三三三ノ 〈y .〉
||ﾚ三三三'´ '～'
ﾚ三三三'
/三三ﾆ/
V三三/
ﾄ三三ﾄ､
┏┓┏┳┓ |ﾆト三;∧ ┏━┓┏┓
┃┗┻╋┛┏━━━━┓┗━┛┃┃
┃┏━┛ ┗━━━━┛┏━━┛┃
┗┛ ＼ﾄ三三l;; ┗━━━┛
＼ﾄ三l（練習） 俺もエアポジ始めるかな
360.00S 250枚（＾_＾） インジ長いこと使ってない
今はローソクとラインとドットのチャート表示を併用してる ドル円動かないからさ
ビットコインfxやってるんだけど
ドル円並みにイライラするで >>401
>>404
もう一声！
リアルに使いたいから。 >>398
朝からジリ上げしての高値張り付きなんだよなこれ 112.20付近でみんなL入れたいんだろうね
そこまで下がるの期待してSいれて112.20で利確からのドテンしたいが
そんな調子いいことになるとは思えんがなると嬉しい ／ミ彡三三ミ､
/彡彡ｿヾミ三ミミヽ
∥彡'''｀ ｀`ヾミﾊ
{彡ｿ ,,ｨ≦ ｨ≧､ Ｙミ}
ﾘ彡 ,.ｨｭ: i .ｨｭ､. Ｙﾘ
ﾊﾘ ´` ノ ヽ` ' ﾘﾊ
Ｙ l /.‐ ‐ ''ｿ
ヽ_ ｨ‐.v→ .::/
ﾍ , ..::::/
} ｀ - -'.:/
_,.ノ| r‐ ⌒ヽ
,.へ ,ｒ''´ ⌒ l
{三ヽ ｛ 、 i ,_, 彡i |
V三ト､{ ﾄ ノミ;," }、 ,ｲ
V三三ﾄ､√ / ヾ i
V三三三＼ ミ / ', ﾐ;
V三三三三＼ / } l
V三三三三三ﾄY l l
|;V三三三三三l | ,'
l三V三三三三｝ l ,'
|三 }三三三三’ ,.ﾉ .,'
|三/三三三ノ 〈y .〉
||ﾚ三三三'´ '～'
ﾚ三三三'
/三三ﾆ/
V三三/
ﾄ三三ﾄ､
┏┓┏┳┓ |ﾆト三;∧ ┏━┓┏┓
┃┗┻╋┛┏━━━━┓┗━┛┃┃
┃┏━┛ ┗━━━━┛┏━━┛┃
┗┛ ＼ﾄ三三l;; ┗━━━┛
＼ﾄ三l 不正上げするな犯罪者安倍晋三死ねやあああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ 15分足上抜けしそうって書き込みする前に上がったやん。先にポジっとけば良かった ドル円って一回でも上げが来るとそれ以降絶対に落ちないよね
下げターンの時はﾄｳﾄﾂﾅ吹き上げで強制終了させるくせに Jewish public (43%) was that Israel and Turkey would gain to the same extent from the
reconciliation agreement between them. Thirty-eight percent think Turkey will gain more
from it, while 7.5% see Israel as the one that will gain more. The rest think neither country
will gain from the agreement or do not know. We also asked in this context: “The families of
the missing casualties Oron Shaul and Hadar Goldin and of the civilian Avera Mengistu,
who is being held by Hamas in Gaza, are demanding that the reconciliation agreement with
5
The Peace Index is a project of the Evens Program for Mediation and Conflict Resolution at Tel Aviv
Negotiations Index: 45.1 (Jews: 41.4)
Graph of the month: Which of the four possibilities concerning the future of the
territories is preferable in your eyes?
Turkey not be signed until Hamas returns the bodies and frees Mengistu. Others claim that
the agreement with Turkey should be signed as soon as possible because it is an important
strategic interest for Israel, and that the issue of returning the bodies and Mengistu should be
dealt with later in the framework of the agreement. With which position do you agree
more?” On the eve of the agreement, 49% supported the families’ demand to delay the
signing while 40% opposed it.
And what is the desirable situation in the territories in the future? Here 23% of the
Jewish public prefers that the situation should remain as it is, 12% prefer the intervention of
the international community, 32% prefer annexation without giving equal rights to the
Palestinians, and 19% prefer annexation that includes the granting of equal rights. In other
words, a majority of the ./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ Jewish public (55%) prefers continued Israeli rule over the
Palestinians, whether it means sustaining the existing situation or annexation without giving
equal rights to the Palestinians. Only few support a return to the 1967 borders or a one-state
solution in which equal rights are given to Israelis and Palestinians.
The most common
preference in the Arab public is that the international community should force Israel to
withdraw (34%), followed immediately by the preference that the situation should remain as
it is (33%). Naturally, only very few (3%) would like to see an annexation without the giving
of equal rights to the Palestinians; neither, though, is there any great desire (only 26%) for a
one-state solution with equal rights for Jews and Palestinians.
The agreement with Turkey: Before the agreement was signed, the prevailing view in the
University and the Guttman Center for Surveys of the Israel Democracy Institute. This month's survey
was conducted by telephone on June 28-29, 2016, by the Midgam Research Institute. The survey
included 600 respondents (500 Jews, 100 Arabs), who constitute a representative national sample of
the entire adult population of Israel aged 18 and over. The maximum measurement error for the entire
sample is ±4.1% at a confidence level of 95%. Statistical processing was done by Ms. Yasmin Alkalay. >>424
わざわざ買わせてから上がるわけねえもんな 騙しだな多分
この時間に上抜けするともっと勢いよく上がるだろ普段 オセアニア・欧州で上げて、米で下げてくれる流れだと、
ほんと安定して分かりやすいんだけどな。ずっと続けてくれ ／ミ彡三三ミ､
/彡彡ｿヾミ三ミミヽ
∥彡'''｀ ｀`ヾミﾊ
{彡ｿ ,,ｨ≦ ｨ≧､ Ｙミ}
ﾘ彡 ,.ｨｭ: i .ｨｭ､. Ｙﾘ
ﾊﾘ ´` ノ ヽ` ' ﾘﾊ
Ｙ l /.‐ ‐ ''ｿ
ヽ_ ｨ‐.v→ .::/
ﾍ , ..::::/
} ｀ - -'.:/
_,.ノ| r‐ ⌒ヽ
,.へ ,ｒ''´ ⌒ l
{三ヽ ｛ 、 i ,_, 彡i |
V三ト､{ ﾄ ノミ;," }、 ,ｲ
V三三ﾄ､√ / ヾ i
V三三三＼ ミ / ', ﾐ;
V三三三三＼ / } l
V三三三三三ﾄY l l
|;V三三三三三l | ,'
l三V三三三三｝ l ,'
|三 }三三三三’ ,.ﾉ .,'
|三/三三三ノ 〈y .〉
||ﾚ三三三'´ '～'
ﾚ三三三'
/三三ﾆ/
V三三/
ﾄ三三ﾄ､
┏┓┏┳┓ |ﾆト三;∧ ┏━┓┏┓
┃┗┻╋┛┏━━━━┓┗━┛┃┃
┃┏━┛ ┗━━━━┛┏━━┛┃
┗┛ ＼ﾄ三三l;; ┗━━━┛
＼ﾄ三l（練習） ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
ユロルは日足ベースで調整必要やから下がる
あがらん
ということは、ドル円は挙がるやろその間 欧州一発目ってその逆いくサインなんじゃねーかと疑ってるわｗ （ ｀・ω・) ＜ショーターを焼き払え
／ ￣::ヽ （ っ¶っ¶ _ ,r─- ､
/￣＼, -''" ::::::::::::::::::ヽ/￣ }
ヽ､_/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ヽ ノ
/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ヽ ｺﾞォー
（ . .:.::;;;.| ::::::●::,::-‐-､::●:::::::|
）.:.:;;.;;;.:ヽ、 :::::::（__Å__）:::::::::::/ ｽﾞｼｰﾝｽﾞｼｰﾝ
ノ. ..:;;.;.ノ `ァ ､＿＿＼＼. ,,／
（ ,.‐''~ ﾜｰ {:::::'￣:::::::::::}＼＼::人 ｺﾞｰ
（..::;ノ )ﾉ__. ＿ ヽ_::）r ´|｀（ ノ＼＼} 丿ヽ丿ヽﾉヽ
）ﾉ__ '|ﾛﾛ|／ ＼ .___. |ﾛﾛ|／ ＼ヽ.＼ノヽノヽノヽ ）ﾉ
＿|田|_|ﾛﾛ|_| ﾛﾛ|＿|田|.|ﾛﾛ|_| ﾛﾛ|＿（.:;;.;;丶 丿ｿ 从 ほいきてる～
大抵は糞ロンドンが円売るながれをつくってっしな ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
完全におかしな動きやんｗ
移動平均上を割らない、不自然な買いあげｗ みんなありがとう！
考えてくれたのは嬉しいけど
現状維持でダッフンダでいくわ 朝の5時の戻り売り場がちょっとしたレジになってるのか(´・ω・`) 欧州はOPある日はだいたいOP狙える位置まで動かしてくる >>391
為替はインサイダーの概念ないしな。必要ない理由は株式よりでっかい市場だし、
それ故値動きもそんなに起きないわけで、姑息なことしたところでその通りにならないってのもあるかと。
風説の流布もインサイダーも為替には規制は無い。 ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
先行スパン１の雲上限でも、１１３．５まで用容易に上昇可能 上は.8、下は.3。
今日はもうこの中でしか動かないよ(´・ω・`) 113.5に引き付けてスイングSしたいけど
今週来るかしら 底打ったんかいな
そろえ114鉛筆目指してもええやろ 先週は111.75L
今日は112.376L指値見事に成功
プラス112.47L
神ってるわ俺w 窓埋めると思って欲張って結局微益撤退（´・ω・｀） これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・4・｀) しかし１１３付近の含み損抱えた大量のロンガーを大人が救いに行くとも思えん
そろそろズドンと来そう 昨日Sしてた時はしつこく113にもどろうとしてたのに微益で手放したらあっさり落ちてるという、こんなんばっかり 月曜の窓梅にこだわって指値失敗したかな
朝一の安値で買って午後売るだけのお仕事でしばらくは儲かるパターンかな >>487
個別じゃなくても株はインサイダーあるでしょ >>484
それは分からん
Lに自信があってもFOMCまで恐いし
その後も恐い 東京で高値すると
ヤンキーは、、、
あとはわかるな？ まだ窓埋め言ってるやついるんだな。
変動相場なんだから上下してあたりまえじゃん。窓なんかに限らずどっか113円でもいいから起点決めとけ。絶対に上下するから >>506
それw
一瞬で落とされるのが見える16時くらいに 115(*´ω｀*)
ﾜﾛﾘﾝﾁﾞﾖ｡｡(*´ω｀*) これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・5・｀) 大してあがってないやんけ
112.8Ｌを早く助けろ 断言する
100パーセント70に付けられないよ
そしてすぐに40まで真っ逆さまに落ちる
そのまま112や 二時間足(*´ω｀*)
嘘つかん｡｡(*´ω｀*)
ﾍﾔｶﾞﾗ(*´ω｀*) ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
５～６時辺りから、おかしいってわかったよな
その前は、全然だったけれど・・
あと今日含めて４日まで昨日のモードかと思ってたけれど・・
今日は、様相が違うと７時で確信。 初動は騙しなんや…
10pip担がれるごとにナンピンなんや… 1つだけ言えることがある
この掲示板はノイズ
見ている者はいずれ負ける これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・6・｀) >>518
L捕まってるからって逆のこと言うジンクスやめな～ どっちにしろ雇用期待上げ
FOMC期待上げ
これ定説な
だからなおさら恐いのよ
簡単すぎて お前らすごいこと発見したぞ
俺のポジの反対をやれば勝率100%だ
マジでふざけんなよ これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・7・｀) >>530
ドル円スレでコテつけて毎回ポジ晒しお願い 底は固まった、あとは上げるだけや
もうちょいだ、もうちょい助けて！ 今週114アタックすればLの未来は明るい
逆に金曜に113.10アタックしてたらヤバい
水木でどこまで見極められるか
五分五分ですよ お前らチャートを目で追ってるだろ
そんなんだから勝てないんだよ
チャートの声を聞け ああああああああああ
時間センターやおおおおおおおおおおお これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・8・｀) よく見ろ
113.08から112.4までおちたんやぞ
今の位置は戻り売りポイントじゃなイカ 俺、ずっと言う輝
これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・9・｀) ドル全面高なのに戻り売りとか
相場知ってる人間に言わせたら死にたいのかって話よ
断言していいけどもう112.5は今日はつけんよ 日米の金利差がある限り円安は確定済み
下げたとこがが押し目でOK ）
（
,, ） ）
ﾞﾐ;;;;;,_ （
ミ;;;;;;;;､;:..,,.,,,,,
i;i;i;i; '',',;^′..ヽ
ﾞゞy､､;:..､） ｝
.¨.､,_,,､_,,r_,ノ′
/;:;":;.:;";i; '',',;;;_~;;;′.ヽ
ﾞ{y､､;:...:,:.:.､;:..:,:.:. ._ ､｝
".¨ｰ=v ''‐ .:v､,,､_,r_,ノ′
/;i;i; '',',;;;_~⌒¨;;;;;;;;ヾ.ﾐﾞ´ﾞ^′..ヽ
ﾞ{y､､;:...:,:.:.､;､;:.:,:.:. ._ .､） ､｝
".¨ｰ=v ''‐ .:v､冫_._ .､,_,,､_,,r_,ノ′
/i;i; '',',;;;_~υ⌒¨;;;;;;;;ヾ.ﾐﾞ´ﾞ^′.ｿ.ヽ
ﾞ{y､､;:..ゞ.:,:.:.､;:.ﾐ.:,:.:. ._υﾟo,,'.､） ､｝
ヾ,,..;::;;;::,;,::;):;:;:; .:v､冫_._ .､,_,,､_,,r_,ノ′ よく考えたら高値から60ぺぺも落ちてるんだよな
埋めなくてもスゴい押し目だったわw
Lの期待度まだまだ60%
Sで大きく抜ける日も全然あると思うけど、Sして担がれて後悔だけはしたくない相場やわ >>558
まぁ見てなよ。
あげる要素がないんだよ。今は金利が上がったから上げてるだけ
すぐにきんりさがるから見てろよ
113L捕まってる俺が言うてるんや間違いない
こんな感じで前回は112.63のLを111で損切らせられた(笑) >>565
Ｌは戻る希望あるけど、Ｓして担がれたら戻らない気がするよな ほれみろドル様は上を見たがってるんだよさっさと道を空けい！ ちょっとした節目やな
4時から上か下かハッキリ動けや はい。ここが天井。16じがらです
できれば113行ってぇお願い 黒田が長短金利操作付イールドカーブコントロールしてるのに
そんなのＨＦだって承知だからね
深追いするわけないよ
もう円高なるのは安倍が退任するか黒田が降参するか
いずれにしても今日明日ではない http://www.ipdl.net/elwood/img/img36_2008102104.jpg
∴∥∴
∴＼∨／∴
＊│＊ ＝＞＊＜＝
＊＼※／＊∵／∧＼∵
─※＊※─ ∵∥∵
＊／※＼＊ ・
＊│＊ ｉ ｉ
／⌒ヽ ｉ
＜二二二フ ｉ
￣ (´^ω^) ￣￣￣￣
( )つ
し-Ｊ |
*"|`*
* * http://www.ipdl.net/elwood/img/img36_2008102104.jpg
∴∥∴
∴＼∨／∴
＊│＊ ＝＞＊＜＝
＊＼※／＊∵／∧＼∵
─※＊※─ ∵∥∵
＊／※＼＊ ・
＊│＊ ｉ ｉ
／⌒ヽ ｉ
＜二二二フ ｉ
￣ (´^ω^) ￣￣￣￣
( )つ
し-Ｊ |
*"|`*
* * 朝9時の.550を上回った時点で戻り売りは無理になったと思うんだ >>568
俺9月に底S付近担がれたんだよw
108円から111円くらいまで
トレンド変わったのを理解するまでホント苦しんだ
特定の目線を強く持ちすぎると判断が鈍くなる経験だった 4時に下がると言っていた人の予言が当たろうとしている・・・ >>582
ほらね。113L捕まってる俺が言うてんねんで(笑)
そらさがる きたか…!!
＿ /￣￣￣/
＼/＿＿＿/
( ﾟдﾟ ) ｶﾞﾀｯ
.r ヾ
＿_|_| |_|
￣￣￣￣￣￣ せやから上がる要素ないって市場は俺の113L狩りたいにきまっとるやろ 112.7迄絶対上がらない予想と
112.5絶対割らない予想のガチバトルだね
只今中間点での攻防
自分は112.45 Sから見守ってます UK political reaction
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "The real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election."
He added that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom".
Conservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government.
Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together,
and the mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy".
Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party.
The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added.
Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe.
The people of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit."
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Northern Ireland was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do
the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
Where the talks are at
The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress"
has been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border.
The UK has been set a deadline of this week to come forward with an improved offer on them,
and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December.
On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn).
Reality Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill?
On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those
who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status.
Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport.
Settled status will grant those who have spent five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens.
Ministers have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date
will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence".
Brexit: All you need to know 東京はヤンキーヤクザのために力を溜めますた（ ＾ω＾） この時間帯か18:00くらいまでは円高
ただし
15分足MAに支えられるとバンドウォークすることもある
俺がショートしてるときに1番嫌いなMA
俺はLしてるけど
判断はみなさんで http://www.ipdl.net/elwood/img/img36_2008102104.jpg
∴∥∴
∴＼∨／∴
＊│＊ ＝＞＊＜＝
＊＼※／＊∵／∧＼∵
─※＊※─ ∵∥∵
＊／※＼＊ ・
＊│＊ ｉ ｉ
／⌒ヽ ｉ
＜二二二フ ｉ
￣ (´^ω^) ￣￣￣￣
( )つ
し-Ｊ |
*"|`*
* *
ユロルの大人が、騙しの仕込みで入った・・おそらく >>625
絶対あがらないよ
45Sすぐに利益乗るよ
むしろここでさらにエスだ
おれの113エルがあるかぎりどこからでもSで勝利 いつも中出しするからって
精子が逆流して塗れないようにパンツにナプキンを貼っていることを知らせたとき
ああすべて見透かされているんだなって傷ついた Trump travel ban: Supreme Court lets restrictions take full effect
The US Supreme Court has ruled President Donald Trump's travel ban on six mainly Muslim countries can go fully into effect.
But the directive against travellers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen still faces legal challenges.
The ruling covers the third version of the directive that President Trump has issued since taking office.
On Monday, seven of the nine justices lifted injunctions imposed by lower courts on the policy.
Only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have allowed the president's order to remain blocked.
Federal appeals courts in San Francisco, California, and Richmond, Virginia, will hear arguments this week on whether the latest iteration of the policy is lawful.
Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news".
But she added: "It's important to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today."
"The fight continues."
How have Trump travel bans fared?
The president's travel bans have each been frustrated by the courts to some degree:
In January, he signed an order banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry.
The measure, which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges
A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens.
By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US, but granted a wide exemption for those with a "bona fide connection" to the US
President Trump's third order was announced in late September. It added non-Muslim-majority nations North Korea and Venezuela, provisions which lower courts have allowed to proceed
What have lower courts said?
In striking it down, federal judges have cited Mr Trump's campaign description of his policy as a "Muslim ban" and his call for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States".
Lower courts have also found the president's policy violated the first amendment of the US constitution covering freedom of religion.
In October, a Maryland federal judge said: "The 'initial' announcement of the Muslim ban, offered repeatedly
and explicitly through President Trump's own statements, forcefully and persuasively expressed his purpose in unequivocal terms."
A federal judge in Hawaii said the administration "lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the interests of the United States'".
A court in Virginia ruled: "The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable. The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed,
" the court ruling said, pointing out that the countries' populations were between 90% and 99% Muslim. >>614
自意識過剰だろお前のクソポジなんざ市場は目もくれんし下げ圧さえ消えりゃ113.50くらい余裕なんだよ傲るな 女性のオシッコ、正しい「拭き方」知ってる？ 「目から鱗」「逆をやってた...」と大反響 詳しくはここをクリック===> Yemen's former leader, Ali Abdullah Salehha killed in Saousa
Former Yemen President Aria Abdullah Sale was murdered in the fight against supporters and former alliance Hautei revolt movement.
Officials of the People 's Congress of President Saleh said he died in an attack in the southern part of the capital Sana'a.
Houthis' leaders welcomed this news as a "very important opportunity".
Mr. Abdul Marik Al-Hawk said that he dismissed the "conspiracy" by the Saudi leader-led coalition government backing the government that had made peace negotiations with President Saleh.
Meanwhile, the UN said the air strikes of Sana intensified and the battle spread to other administrations like Haja.
According to a report of the UN Humanitarian Affairs Adjustment Office, the road was closed and tanks were on the street. Some of the most intense battles were in diplomatic areas near the UN forces.
After the death of Sareha, the future of Yemen is terrible
The Red Cross presumed that at least 125 people were killed and more than 230 people were injured as a riot occurred on Friday.
United Nations humanitarian affairs coordinator Jamie McGoldrick asked civilians to leave their homes on 5 December to seek assistance
and call for humanitarian stops for rescue workers to continue their life-saving program.
"They do not know what will come next ... children and young people - that is terribly sad" to the BBC.
"For us it is in a situation where we can not help them because we are bound in the same way and we do not have the ability to respond to their needs in the way we need them.
Ali Abdullah Saleh, the dominant power of Yemen
Yemen's conflict: Who is fighting with whom?
How did the rebel army civil war start?
Until recently, supporters of Salea were fighting side by side with Houthis in the fight against the present President Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi.
But on Wednesday the conflict over Sanna's largest mosque control resulted in an armed conflict where more than 125 people died.
President Sarer suggested to "create a new page" with the coalition government led by Saudi Arabia, when he stopped blocking Yemen 's attacks and stopped blocking countries in Saturday.
Houthis condemned the "coup d'etat" against "an alliance he never believed".
How did Sale die?
By Sunday, Houthi's combatants dominated many of the capital, intense fights were taking place around Saleh's family and its allied houses.
Mr. Salare's home rioted Monday morning because the bombing of the ruling coalition leader led by Saudi did not stop Hautis. Soon thereafter, reports began to appear that he was killed.
A video circulated on social media showing a man's body resembling Mr. Sareha who has a severe head injury. That is, armed men came on a blanket shouting
."Please praise God." And "a little ant 's affash!" - the name of Mr. Saleh' s clan.
After that, officials of the People's Congress confirmed Sale's death. They said that the escort group, where he and the other officials were in,
received the firing of Houshi fighter, escaping from the south towards Sahan, the hometown of the prolums leader.
According to some reports, he was stopped by the RPG rocket and was temporarily killed and then removed from his car.
What was the reaction to the news?
Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi celebrated what he called "the Day of the Collapse of Rebellious Conspiracy." He also insisted that Houthis "has no problem" with GPC or its members.
But unknown GPC officials said to the Al Arabiya TV owned by Saudi that the Yemenians "should go to the street and face Haute's militia". >>630
そんなに自虐的にならんでも
一旦.5付けてから再度上がる可能性もあるよ >>85
On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn).
Reality Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill?
On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those
who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status.
Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport.
Settled status will grant those who have spent five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens.
Ministers have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date
will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence".
Brexit: All you need to know
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "The real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election."
He added that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom".
Conservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government.
Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together,
and the mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy".
Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party.
The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added.
Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe.
The people of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit."
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Northern Ireland was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do
the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
>>77
:::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cAR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
UK political reaction
Where the talks are at
The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress"
has been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border.
The UK has been set a deadline of this week to come forward with an improved offer on them,
and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December. >>636
あと一円上がるんですか？
下げ圧消えるわけないでしょう
北朝鮮 ロシアゲート 税制改革
どう考えても無理です こんな中途半端なところでLもSもしたくない
Lはビッグのエル 日笠陽子[ひよっち] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 06:01:09.08 >>284
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ ＿＿＿＿
The group says there are 12 settlements in East Jerusalem, inhabited by about 200,000 settlers.
Israel also established settlements in the Gaza Strip, seized from Egypt in the 1967 war, but it dismantled
them when it withdrew from the territory in 2005. It also built settlements in the Sinai Peninsula, seized too
from Egypt in 1967, but removed them in 1982 as part of a peace agreement with Cairo.
There are also dozens of settlements on the occupied Golan Heights, captured from Syria in the 1967 war.
Built-up settlement areas occupy abo
ut 2% of the West Bank but critics point out that the land controlled by
settlement activity, such as agriculture and roads, amounts to much more than that and requires heavy military presence.
Settlers themselves choose to live in these communities for a range of reasons - from economic, encouraged
by government subsidies, to religious, based on the belief that God gave the land to the Jewish people.
Why are settlements so contentious?
W .／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
The issue of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem has long been a major sourc
e of dispute between Israel and the Palestinians, and most of the international community.
Here is a brief guide to what it is all about.
What are settlements?>>270
Settlements are communities established by Israel on land occupied in the 1967 Middle East war.
This includes the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. The West Bank and
East Jerusalem had previously been occupied by Jordan since the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War.
According to the Israeli settlement watchdog Peace Now, there are 131 settlements in the West Bank,
housing about 385,000 Israeli Jewish settlers, and 97 outposts - settlements built without official authorisation.
West Bank settlements map
on>>271
There are dozens of unauthorised settlements, known as outposts, across the West Bank
What happens with settlements has proven to be one of the most intractable issues between Israel and the
Palestinians, and rows about them have caused the collapse of numerous rounds of peace talks.
Palestinians say the presence of settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem - land they seek for a
future state - make such a state with contiguous territory impossible. They have demanded Israel freeze all settlement activity as a precondition for resuming peace talks.
Palestinians' freedom of movement is also restricted by hundreds of checkpoints, roadblocks and other obstacles used to protect both settlements and Israel from militants.
Israel says the Palestinians are using the issue of settlements as a pretext to avoid direct talks
. It says settlements are not a genuine obstacle to peace and are negotiable.
Under the 1993 Israel-Palestinian Oslo peace accords, the issue of settlements was to be deferred
until final status talks - a reason why Israel objects to pre-conditions and UN resolutions on the matter.
Will things change under Donald Trump?
Israelis sit outside cafe in front of screen showing Donald TrumpImage copyrightAFP
Image caption>>272
Donald Trump's presidency could mean unfettered settlement-building>>274
>>275
Almost certainly. President Trump has declared strong support for Israel and signalled a much more tolerant attitude
towards settlement activity than his predecessor, Barack Obama. Mr Trump appointed an ambassador to Israel who is a staunch settlement supporter.
The settler movement enthusiastically welcomed Mr Trump's election, and the pro-settler government, emboldened b 四時ってわりと動くね
日本抜けて欧州もいないから少額でやりたい放題なのかな 黒田さん続投しないのかね
やっぱ次期総裁は本田さんか 10分足の雲の形と、4時間足の雲の形が酷似してる！
足まで似てる！ >>651
期間ですか？
とりあえず今月と言っておきましょう
もちろん自分としては113乗せてくれたら嬉しいですよ ◎-◎一distinguish between the entry >>408
igrants generally receive more extensive vetti
ng than nonimmigrants, such vetti
日
笠
陽子[ひよっち] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 06:01:09.08
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
ry of nationals of 7 countries found to be ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cwith respect to the baseli
ne described in subsection (c) of this section: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria
, Venezuela, and Yeme:::::::::::| で 地 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ ..>>408
>>407
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(ii) After reviewing the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 20
17, and accounting for the foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives of the United States, I have determined to restrict and limit the ent
n. These restrictions of immigrants and nonimmigrants. Persons admitted on immigrant visas become lawful p
ermanent residents of the United States. Such persons may present national security or public-safety concerns that may be distinct from those admitted as noni
mmigrants. The United St汚 i::::::::::::
:::::::::::.ゝ ates affords lawful permanent residents more endu
ring rights than it does to nonimmigrants. Lawf
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←(AR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ul permanent residents are more diff
icult to remove than nonim>>410
>>409
migrants even after national security concerns arise, which heightens the costs and dangers of errors associated with admitting such
individuals. And although immng is less reliable when the country from which s
omeone seeks to emigrate exhibits significant gaps in its identity-manage
ment or information-sharing policies, or presents risks to the national security of the
United States. For all but one of those 7 countries, therefore, I am restricting the entry of all immigrants.
／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿ ,/ﾆ>>
(iii) I am adopting a more tailored approach with respect to nonimmigrants, in accordance with the recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security. F
or some countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline describ
ed in subsection (c) of this section, I am restricting the entry of all nonim
migrants. For countries with certain mitigating factors, such as a willingness to c
ooperate or play a substantial role in combatting terrorism, I am restricting the
entry only of certain categories of nonimmigrants, which will mitigate the security th
reats presented by their entry int＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _) ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ o the United States. In those cases in which fut
ure cooperation seems reasonably likely, and accounting for foreign policy, national secu
rity, and counterterrorism objectives, I have tailored the restrictions to encourage such improvements.
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provi もう負けることはできないと覚悟を決めたトレーダーはストップロスを無視する。そして負ける。。。 時間足も5分足もちょうど20MAの付近なんだよね(´・ω・`) 時間足天井ぽいなぁ。
でも下がるかといわれれば
Sして担がれて待つのは苦痛だし .75迄上げたら113目指す
.35迄下げたら112目指すと予想
その間はどっちに振れるか分からん 今日はショーターホイホイになる予感しかしねえから
あとはYするわ .60付近はMA15のライン
18:00までに大きく割れなかったら
バンドウォークLサインと見るべきところですね >>657
君自分のレス見返してみ
損出しすぎて頭おかしくなっとんのか ダウ先・プラス５０．ＮＹ・２０時から ドル円 買い で来る 2野水伊織さん
おぼう] 投稿ectively and consistently cooperate, combined with the terrorist threat that ema
nates from its territory, present special circumstances that warrant restrictions and limitations on the ent
ry of its nationals into the United States. Somalia's identity-management deficiencies and the significant terr
orist presence within its territory make it a source of particular risks to the national security and public safet
y of the United States. Based on the consider
>>422
東
山奈央[な日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
ry for the security or welfare of the United
States." The Secretary of Homeland Security determined that Somalia generally satisfies the inf
ormation-sharin>>423
g requirements of the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section, but its gov
ernment's inability to effations mentioned above | -
| ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ |
＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l
Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い歳して声優のの浴衣姿やエッ
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provided that the "Secretary of Stat
e, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security may also submit to
t>>424
he President the names of additional countries for which any of them recommends othe
r lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessa, and as described further in section 2(h)
of this proclamation, I have determined that entry restrictions, limitations, and other measures designed to ensure
proper screening and vetting for nationals of Somalia are necessary for the security and welfare of the United States.
(j) Section 2 of this proclamation describes some of the inadequacies that led me to impose restrictions on the sp
ecified countries. Describing all of those reasons publicly, however, would cause serious damage to the national se
curity of the United States, and many such descriptions are classified.
Sec. 2. Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Identified Concern. The entry into the United States of nati
onals of the following countries is hereby suspended
his proclamation:
(a) Chad.
>>425
(i) The government of Chad is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the Unite
d States Government looks forward to expanding that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border manag
ement. C>>426
had has shown a clear willingness to improve in these areas. Nonetheless, Chad does not adequately share public-
safety and terrorism-related information and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion. Additionally, several terrorist group
s are active within Chad or in the surrounding region, including elements of Boko Haram, ISIS-West Africa, and al-Qa'ida in the Isla
mic Maghreb. At this time, additional information sharing to identify those foreign nationals applying for visas or seeking entry into
the United States who represent national security and public-safety threats is necessary given the significant terrorism-related risk from this country. 新興スパコン企業「PEZY Computing」に東京地検特捜部が強制捜査 また反転ダッシュ式の極せまクソレンジか？
死ね糞通貨 ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
ユロルのチャート見て餅付けよ
ドル円あがるぞｗ
無慈悲あげ 名子[っち] 投稿日笠陽：2017/ひよ12/051:09.08
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地 ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
::: _＿ノ -◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ >>450(ii) The ent←( ry into the United States of nationals of Chad, as immigrants, and
as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(b) Iran. >>451
(i) Iran regularly fails前：日 to cooperate wi ' ● ' ﾆ ､ th the United States Government in identifying security risks, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion, is
the source of significant terrorist thr:::::::: 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 eats, and fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The Department
of State has also designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism.
(ii) The entry into the United States of .ゝ 抜 nationals of Iran as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is hereby suspended, except that entry by such
nationals under val 汚 i::::::::::::
:::ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た id student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas is not suspended, although such individuals should be subject to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.
(c) L ｡||-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ibya.>>452
(i) The government of Libya is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the United States Governm
ent looks forward to expanding on that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Libya, nonetheless, faces
significant challenges i｡ヽn sharing several types of information, including public-safety and terrorism-related information necessary for the prot
ection of the national security and public safety oヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;f the United States. Libya also has significant inadequacies in its identity-management protoco
ls. Further, Libya fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion and has been assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nation
als subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The substantial terrorist presence within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Libya, as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and
business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspende （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿d.
(d) Nort>>454 Korea. ::_|/`
(i) North Korea does not cooperate with the United States Government in any respect and fails to satisfy all information-sharing requirements.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of North Korea as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
(e) S>>456yria.
(i) Syria regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks, is the source of significant terrorist threats, and h
as been designated by the Department of State as a state sponsor of terrorism. Syria has significant inadequacies in identity-management proto
cols, fails to share public-safety and terrorism information, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
（-◎>>457>>460
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Syria as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ して声
ational securitfic, Penal and Criminal Investigation Service Corps; the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service; and the Minist
ry of the Popular Power for Foreign Re1 名前奈う]＿
.／, - ､, - 投日：201/057：東山:46
＿＿＿ ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡
|｡ |―- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣>>467
―-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀
- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| -
| ― | |>>468
>>473
| ´ | ｀
ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.￣￣ ノノ
＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ 央ぼ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良優の野織さん衣姿やエッVenezuela.
(i) Venezuela has adopted many of the baseline standards identified by the Secretary of Homeland Securit
y and in section 1 of this proclamation, but its government is uncooperative in verifying whether its citizens
pose ny or public-safety threats. Venezuela's government fails to share public-safety and ter
rorism-related information の浴adeq水伊uately, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion, and has been assessed t
o be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationaなおls subject to final orders of removal from the U
nited States. There are, ho>>475
>>476
>>478wever, alternative sources for obtaining information to verify the citizenship and id
entity of nationals from Vい歳enezuela. As a result, the restrictions imposed by this proclamation focus on govern
ment officials of Venezu
ela who are responsible for the identified inadequacies.
(ii) Notwithstanding section 3(b)(v) of this proclamation, the entry into the United States of officials of
agencies of Venezuela involved in screening and vetting procedures -- including the Ministry of the Popular Pow
er for Interior, Justice and Peace; the Administrative Service of Identification, Migration and Immigration; the Scie
ntilatio
ns -- and their immediate family members, as nonimmigrants on busine
ss (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended. Further, nationals of Venezuela
who are visa holders >>471
should be subject to appropriate additional measures to ensure traveler information remains current.
(g) Yemen.
(i) The government of Yemen is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner, and the United States
Government looks forward to expanding that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management.
Yemen, nonetheless, faces significant identity-management challenges, which are amplified by the notable terrorist presence within its territory.
The government of Yemen fails to satisfy critical identity-management requirements, does not share public-safety
and terrorism-related information adequately, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Yemen as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1),
tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(h) Somalia. ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
英語の嵐すごいな ries in the degree to which its government lacks command and control of its territory, which greatly limits
the effectiveness of its national capabilities in a variety of respects. Terrorists use under-governed areas in
northern, central日
笠よっ
ち] 投
稿
日：>>495:::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
陽子[ひ:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
:香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い ﾞi ::::::>>494
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` '
● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人>>497
>>502
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎
-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NR
N/cA
R
0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿====
（ i）==
::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(i) The Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017, determined tha
t Somalia satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described in section 1(
c) of this proclamation. But several other considerations support imposing entry restrictions and
limitations on Somalia. Somalia has significant identity-management deficiencies. For example,
while Somalianited States and many other countries do not
recognize it. A persistent terrorist threat also emanates from Somalia's territory. The United Stat
es Govern>>505ment has identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven. Somalia stands apart from other count
, and southern Somalia as safe havens from which to plan, facilitate, and conduct their operations. S
omalia also remains a destination for individuals attempting to join terrorist groups that threaten the national security o
f the United States. The Stports on Terrorism observed that Somalia has not sufficient
ly degraded the ability of terrorist groups to plan and mount attacks from its territory. Further, despite having made signific
ant progress toward formally federating its member states, and its willingness to fight terrorism, Somalia continues to struggl
e to provide the governance needed to limit terrorists' freedom of movement, access to resources, and capacity to operate. The
government of Somalia's lack of territorial control also comp
romises Somalia's ability, already limited because of poor recordkeeping, to share information about its nationals who pose criminal
or terrorist risks. As a result of these and other factors, Somalia presents special concerns that distinguish it from other countries.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Somalia as immigrants is hereby suspended. Additionally, visa adjudications for n
ationals of Somalia and decisions regarding their entry as nonimmigrants should be subject to additional scrutiny to determine if applica
nts are connected to terrorist organizations or otherwise pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States.
Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspensions and Limitations. (a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this
section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspensions of and limitations on entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclam
ation shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:
(i) are outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation;
(ii) do not have a valid visa on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation; and
(iii) do not qualify for a visa or other valid travel document under section 6(d) of this proclamation. >>630
そんな必死にならんでもヤンキーは一度振ってくるからどっちみち助かるよ。
上トレンドにしても今１１３つかむのは悪手も悪手。日足みりゃあげすぎなの分かるだろ。
絶対強い押し目くるんだからそこで買えばいい。今日なら朝。 今夜もNY高猫アタックに備え
FIXガラを警戒しよう
Sするなら1:00過ぎのみやな Jewish public (43%) was that Israel and Turkey would gain to the same extent from the
reconciliation agreement between them. Thirty-eight percent think Turkey will gain more
from it, while 7.5% see Israel as the one that will gain more. The rest think neither country
will gain from the agreement or do not know. We also asked in this context: “The families of
the missing casualties Oron Shaul and Hadar Goldin and of the civilian Avera Mengistu,
who is being held by Hamas in Gaza, are demanding that the reconciliation agreement with
5
The Peace Index is a project of the Evens Program for Mediation and Conflict Resolution at Tel Aviv
Negotiations Index: 45.1 (Jews: 41.4)
Graph of the month: Which of the four possibilities concerning the future of the
territories is preferable in your eyes?
Turkey not be signed until Hamas returns the bodies and frees Mengistu. Others claim that
the agreement with Turkey should be signed as soon as possible because it is an important
strategic interest for Israel, and that the issue of returning the bodies and Mengistu should be
dealt with later in the framework of the agreement. With which position do you agree
more?” On the eve of the agreement, 49% supported the families’ demand to delay the
signing while 40% opposed it.
And what is the desirable situation in the territories in the future? Here 23% of the
Jewish public prefers that the situation should remain as it is, 12% prefer the intervention of
the international community, 32% prefer annexation without giving equal rights to the
Palestinians, and 19% prefer annexation that includes the granting of equal rights. In other
words, a majority of the ./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ Jewish public (55%) prefers continued Israeli rule over the
Palestinians, whether it means sustaining the existing situation or annexation without giving
equal rights to the Palestinians. Only few support a return to the 1967 borders or a one-state
solution in which equal rights are given to Israelis and Palestinians.
The most common
preference in the Arab public is that the international community should force Israel to
withdraw (34%), followed immediately by the preference that the situation should remain as
it is (33%). Naturally, only very few (3%) would like to see an annexation without the giving
of equal rights to the Palestinians; neither, though, is there any great desire (only 26%) for a
one-state solution with equal rights for Jews and Palestinians.
The agreement with Turkey: Before the agreement was signed, the prevailing view in the
University and the Guttman Center for Surveys of the Israel Democracy Institute. This month's survey
was conducted by telephone on June 28-29, 2016, by the Midgam Research Institute. The survey
included 600 respondents (500 Jews, 100 Arabs), who constitute a representative national sample of
the entire adult population of Israel aged 18 and over. The maximum measurement error for the entire
sample is ±4.1% at a confidence level of 95%. Statistical processing was done by Ms. Yasmin Alkalay. 月末じゃなきゃLDNFIXなんて影響ないんじゃね？
OPもこれだけ離れていれば吸引力ないだろうし。 ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
売りの２ハは、一瞬で終わる。そこがイラつかない。
買いの２ハは、時間でイラつかせる。だから、ワイは、
ユロルを売る。売りの方が精神衛生上、良好だぜ close to half of the
public (48%) considers that Britain’s exit from the EU, or Brexit, will not have an effect one
way or the other, 17% think Brexit will strengthen the EU’s intention to pressure Israel, 11%
believe it will weaken it, and 24% do not know. Among the Arabs a clear majority (65%)
thinks that the situation regarding pressure on Israel will not change if Britain leaves the EU.
And
Voting if a referendum were to be held in Israel today on the question of leaving the
territories: We asked: “If a referendum were to be held in Israel today on whether, in
principle, it is desirable to remain, as at present, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria or to
leaifferent distribution, almost even, would emerge if the Jewish public were to vote in a
referendum in a situation where a draft agreement with the Palestinians was on the table. At
present, 46% say they would vote against a withdrawal from the West Bank/Judea and
「￣￣了
l h「￢丨 ＜日本
語くらい
わかれよアニ
ve it while retaining the large settlement blートのID:RH7
HOye50ocs, how would you vote?” A majority (52%)
of the Jewish interviewees reported that in the豚基地 existing situation they would vote against a
withdrawal, while 36% answered that they would vote in favor. Among the Arabs a majority
(69%) said that if a referendum were to be held today, they would vote in favor of leaving
the territories while retaining the large settlement blocs.
Voting if there were to be a referendum based on a draft peace agreement: A slightly
d
外屑ニ
／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿
／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ
/ ／∧ / / /.i l iー――‐u'￣
./ ／ Д｀ / /
/ / l l
i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ' l l
. / _/ ＼ !、 lヽ＿＿＿_」 l
.about half of the Jewish public (51%) thinks that in such a referendum, if it were to be held,
all the citizens of the country would be entitled to participate. A large minority (44%)
believe that only the Jewish citizens of the country would be entitled to participate in it.
4
Will Britain’s exit from the EU affect the EU’s policy? On how the British referendum
will affect the EU’s intention to pressure Israel on the Palestinian issue, what is the likely situation in the territories in the future? The prevailing view
!、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./
ﾄ、＿_＼/
ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y l
l ￣( ）y ） /l
i
l l Y''/ー' / .l l
!、 l l./ / l l
/ / l/
,/ i'
/_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」
L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」
`ー' `ヽ＿」Samaria, whereas 43% say they would vote in favor. Among the Arabs, the rate of voters
favoring a withdrawal w豚声ould exceed three-fourths.
Who would be entitled to participate in a referendum on the future of the territories?
In a democratic country all citizens are entitled to participate in a referendum. However, only
among the Jewish public (37.5%) is that the situation will continue as it is. Twenty percent
hold the view that the international community will force Israel to withdraw to the 1967
borders. An identical rate thinks Israel will annex the territories without giving the
Palestinians equal rights to those of the Israelis, and 9% anticipate that Israel will annex the
territories and grant equal rights to the Palestinians. In the Arab public the most common
assessment (45%) is that the situation will remain as it is. 相場ってのはパターンが続く傾向があるからな
これからの注目はFIXとオセアニア時間の高値
また何か来る可能性はある うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 上窓開いて上試すも反落して日足終値が安値引けした次の日に高猫するチャートってあまり見たことねえな ビットコインって初期から200万倍以上になってるんだろ
すげえよなあ
1000円かってりゃ22億ってか
わけわからんわ
2010年の時点でさえビットコイン価格は1BTC約0.25円だったみたいだな
マジで数千円とか数万円分買っただけで数十億、数百億とかありえねーだろ
試しに買って小額だから忘れてるやつとかいそう ロングの時間ですよ
いつまでショートの気分のままでいるのさ？
つうかワッチョイなしかよ The 300 page report explains how civil servants in the Eastern Cape province funded, ignored the basic rules, and inflated costs.
Former South African president Nelson Mandela is drawn on 17th July 2012 at the home of Knoe, Eastern Cape Province, during the visit of former US President. copyright AFP
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cAR0PM.
"There was an invoice showing using ANC's letterhead, money was paid, but no service was offered,"
she said from EyeWitness News in South Africa.
She adds as follows. "We expect that anyone who commits these acts will be transferred to work.
Busy Mkhwebane, a national civil guardian group, asked President Jacob Zuma to seek further assertion, using the Special Investigation Department,
as the country's national conservation organization, Busi Mkhwebane, was 95 years old this year since Mr Mandela died.
Image caption
Mandela tried to defeat the apartheid government, and after 27 years jailed the prison
Mr. Mkhwebane said South Africa's Mail & Guardian newspaper did not make regulations on spending on public funds "extremely scary" or "scary."
She said at a news conference, "It is very important that we can use a funeral to do something like this." "How do I bill a fee, escalate, or send me a bill about what I have not delivered?"
Mr. Mkhwebane not only fulfilled the role of dismantling in the confusion but also confessed
that South African ruling party ANC parties had instructed the authorities on how to spend money.
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
:::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
Nelson Mandela's Funeral: 'Millions of Miss Pent'
South Africa's Corruption Monitoring Group found four years ago that government authorities misused millions of dollars during the funeral of Nelson Mandela.
According to this report, 300 meters of site ($ 22 m; 16 million) was redirected from development fund to help cost.
According to the report, this was reported because of "public health, thief replacement, hospital refurbishment" etc.
Instead, authorities are said to have spent it on items like a $ 24 T - shirt.
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
`A man who destroy apartheid
State funeral of Nelson Mandela: photo
The claim of misuse emerged for the first time in the world in 2014 several months after Mr. Mandela's funeral was held in Kunoo, Eastern Cape Province in December 2013.
This is not the first scandal to surround the official event commemorating the life of heroes of apartheid struggle.
A man who was charged with the interpretation of sign language at the anniversary festival was accused of doing a gesture,
but the fight to dominate the heritage in the family of Mandela slept in the last few months of his life.
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; >>699
来年まで見ないと思ったが
そんなこと書くからビットコイン我慢できずに自分の利益確認してしまった
４２５万
ありがてぇ 2015, he was given the prestigious Dada Saheb Phalke Award, the highest honour in Indian cinema.
Kapoor was known for his charming smile and was often described by his fans as the "handsomest star ever". He had a huge fan following among women.
He was cast alon ＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
han in some of the biggest Bollywood blockbusters of the 1970s and 1980s, and the two actors played brothers, best friends or rivals.
His comment in Deewar - "Mere paas ./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ―
| |
Veteran Bollywood actor and producer Sh゜)o彡゜ ◆NRN/ashi Kapoor has died aged 79.
Kapoor, who acted in huge hits like Deewar and Kabhie Kabhie, had been ill for some time and was in hospital.
He was a member o } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い歳して声優のf the Kapoor dynasty, which has dominated the Hindi film industry for decades.
He won several national film awards and was awarded the Padma Bhushan civilian honour by the Indian government in 2011. He also acted in a number of British and American films.
Kapoor died at the Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambanやエッチな衣装姿で抜きまくってる哀れな
ハム信者i Hospital in the western city of Mumbai.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Yes he has passed away. He had kidney problem since several years. He was on dialysis for several years," his nephew, actor Randhir Kapoor, told Press Trust of India. The funeral will be held on Tuesday morning, he said.
The actor was married to late English actress Jennifer Kendal, with whom he set up Mumbai's iconic Prithvi Theatre in 1978. His sister-in-law is British actress Felicity Kendal.
Shashi Kapoor wins top film award
Listen to Shashi Kapoor tracks
BBC Asian Network special on Shashi Kapoor
Kapoor began ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣
―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣野his career as a child actor and appeared in more than 150 films, including a dozen in English. He became known internationally for his roles in Merchan
t Ivory productions like "Shakespeare-wallah" and "Heat and Dust".
Ingside superstar Amitabh Bachcmaa hai" (But I have mother's
support) - during a tense confrontation with screen-sibling Bachchan tops the list of best Bollywood lines for millions of fans around the globe.
Over the years, it has found its way on to merchandise like shoulder bags, coffee mugs and cushion covers.
As news of his death spread, fans took to social media to express their grief and pay tributes, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi: | ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼水伊織さんの浴衣姿で基地外ニート( ゜∀cAR0PMwwwwwww >>708
それじゃ俺もうっすらにうっすらのせよう ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
ユロルは、１．１８を割り込むはず 113円超えないともう俺は助からない
なんて年末だ
いや2017年ずっとこんな感じだった
俺に女神は微笑んでくれるのか （ ｀・ω・) ＜ショーターを焼き払え
／ ￣::ヽ （ っ¶っ¶ _ ,r─- ､
/￣＼, -''" ::::::::::::::::::ヽ/￣ }
ヽ､_/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ヽ ノ
/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::ヽ ｺﾞォー
（ . .:.::;;;.| ::::::●::,::-‐-､::●:::::::|
）.:.:;;.;;;.:ヽ、 :::::::（__Å__）:::::::::::/ ｽﾞｼｰﾝｽﾞｼｰﾝ
ノ. ..:;;.;.ノ `ァ ､＿＿＼＼. ,,／
（ ,.‐''~ ﾜｰ {:::::'￣:::::::::::}＼＼::人 ｺﾞｰ
（..::;ノ )ﾉ__. ＿ ヽ_::）r ´|｀（ ノ＼＼} 丿ヽ丿ヽﾉヽ
）ﾉ__ '|ﾛﾛ|／ ＼ .___. |ﾛﾛ|／ ＼ヽ.＼ノヽノヽノヽ ）ﾉ
＿|田|_|ﾛﾛ|_| ﾛﾛ|＿|田|.|ﾛﾛ|_| ﾛﾛ|＿（.:;;.;;丶 丿ｿ 从 うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 欧州時間前半からバンドウォークするとNYまで押し目なく上がる
これ定説な . ﾉｼ
(´；ω；`) Sわっしょいされたあああああああああああああああああああああああああ。 The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers
of wking of all institutions devoted to the care and education of children.
The Occupying Power shall take all necessary steps to facilitate the identification of children and the registration of
t
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.>>711
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security
of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement
of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons
it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes
as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.>>712
>>716
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent,
that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected
in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
heir parentage. It may not, in any case, change their personal status, nor enlist them in formations or organizations subordinate to it.
Should the local institutions be inadequate for the purpose, the Occupying Power shall make arrangements for the
maintenance and education, if possible by persons of their own nationality, language and religion, of children
who are orphaned or separated from their parents as a result of the war and who cannot be adequately cared for by a near relative or friend.
A special section of the Bureau set up in accordance with Article 136 [ Link ] shall be responsible for taking
all necessary steps to identify children whose identity is in doubt. Particulars of their parents or other near relatives should always be recorded if available.
The Occupying Power shall not hinderof any preferential measures in regard to food, medical
care and protection against the effects of war, which may have been adopted prior to the occupation in favour
of children under fifteen years, expectant mothers, and mothers of children under seven years.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to serve>>717
in its armed or auxiliary forces. No pressure or propaganda which aims at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to work unless they are over eighteen years of age,
and then only on work which is necessary either for the needs of the army of occupation, or for the public utility
services, or for the feeding, sheltering, clothing, transportation or health of the population of the occupied country.
Protected persons may not be compelled to undertake any work which would involve them in the obligation of taking part in military operations.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to employ forcible means to ensure the security
of the installations where they are performing compulsory labour.>>>722
The work shall be carried out only in the occupied territory where the persons whose services have been requisitioned are. >>718
この上げが上で捕まってるロングの逃げ場やで お風呂入ったら上がってた！！！
予言では70つけない言うたけど内心113いってほしいです
だからこそガラる気しかしないのです
113Lたすけてえええええ 汚名前：日
で 地
笠陽子[ひよっち] 投稿日：2017/1
2/05(火) 06:ada Saheb Phalke Award, the highest honour in Indian cinema.
Kapoor was know01:09.08
香 菊:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
Shashi Kapoor's versatility could be seen in his movies as well as in theatre,
which he promoted with great passion. His brilliant ac
ting will be remembered for generations to come.
Saddened by his demise. Condolences to his family and admirers.:::::::::::| i::::::::::::
:::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
Kapoor began his career as a child actor and appeared in more than 150 films, including a dozen in English. He became known internationally for his roles in Merchant Ivory productions like "Shakespeare-wallah" and "Heat and Dust".
In 2015, he was given the prestigious Dn for his cocial medi:::::::::::/ い ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ harming smile and was often described by his fans as the "handsomest star ever". He had a huge fan following among women.
He was cast alongside superstar Amitabh Bachchan in some of the biggest Bollywood blockbusters of the 1970s and 1980s, and the two actors played brothers, best friends or rivals.
His comment in Deewar - "Mere paas maa hai" (But I have mother's support) - during a tense confrontation with screen-sibling Bachchan tops the list of best Bollywood lines for millions of fans around the globe.
Over the years, it has found its way on to merchandise like shoulder bags, coffee mugs and cushion covers.
As news of his death spread, fans took to s（＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-
◎
-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←(
ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN
/cA
R0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; >>728
. ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) 安西さんの言うこと聞いておけばよかった。 日米の金利差がある限り円安は確定済み
下げたとこがが押し目でOK >>731
今日あげるだろ
113手前くらいまではいくんじゃね >>734
ニューヨークはバクハゲかもしれません(´･ω･`) うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ まー、10時間かけて一生懸命上げた30pipを10分でこなすNYさんがみれるイメージだな、今日は。 抜 美 前 ／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
I am surprised and disappointed that the British government now appears not to be in a position to conclude what was agreed earlier today," he told a press conference in Dublin.
Ireland 'disappointed' at no deal on Brexit
Kuenssberg: What on earth happened?The talks are understood to hav
e broken down after the Democratic Unionist Party refused to accept concessions on the Irish border issue.
Downing Street said that was not the only outstanding problem.
Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar said a deal had been done, but the UK appeared to change its mind over the Irish border question after pressure from the DUP.
ADVERTISEMENT
"
What will happen to EU citizens in the UK?
Sturgeon calls for 'special' Brexit deals
Northern Ireland's DUP has 10 MPs at Westminster, and their support is vital to the government.
This is because the Conservatives are without a Commons majority since June's general election, and rely on a deal with the DUP to ensure they can survive key votes.
How the talks broke down
Mrsニ ＿ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ _ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
UK and EU fail to strike Brexit talks deal
The UK and EU have failed to reach an agreement to move to the next stage of Brexit talks, Theresa May has said.
The prime minister said talks would reconvene "before the end of the week" and she was "confident we will conclude this positively".
May is understood to have broken off from talks with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker to speak to DUP leader Arlene Foster.
T
Why is the DUP unhappy about the plan?
DUP leader Arlene Foster said her party would not accept any Brexit deal that "separates" Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
Her party's Brexit spokesman Sammy Wilson claimed Brussels has been trying to "bounce the prime minister into acceding to the shape of a deal they want" and many of her own backbenchers would not accept it.
He said the DUP objected to the form of words used in a draft document, which he said referred to "regulatory alignment" and "no regulatory divergence" between Northern Ireland and the EU.
Both phrases were "simply EU speak for keeping Northern Ireland in the European market" and "in effect, part of the United Kingdom would be kept within the single market," he said.
Asked if the DUP would pull out of the confidence and supply agreement they have with the Conservative government in Westminster over this issue, he said: "I think that her (Theresa May) problem isn't going to be just with the DUP".
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （:::::::
::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地
汚 i::::::::::::
ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/c:::::::::::.ゝ ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
ε （∴←( ﾟ∀AR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 112.9超えると114円まで行くから気を付けてね 良い歳して声優の野水
伊織さんの浴衣姿やエッ
1 名前：東山おぼう] 投稿奈央[な日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ― | |
nservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government.
le of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit."
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said that if Northern wyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
Where the talks are at
The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress"
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
UK political reaction
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said: "The real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election."
He added Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-
Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together,
and the who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status.
Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport.
Settled status will grant those who have spent
Ireland was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do
the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Car>>261
five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens.
Minis
mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy".
Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party.
The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added.
m Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe.
The peop
that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom".
Cohas been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border.
The UK has been set a deadline of this week to c
ome forward with an improved offer on them,
and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December.
On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn).
y Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill?
On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those
ters have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date
will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence".
Brexit: All you need to know 日米の金利差がある限り円安はもうどうにも止まらんーー
これ基本、押したとこで軽ぅぅーーく、L発射で蔵が建つ 上がるのゆっくりでいいよ
NYで切り返されたくないからw
ゆっくりゆっくり
一休み一休み 俺、ずっと言う輝
これ、ずーっとアゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・84・｀) 朝から---NG---しまくり。
気の毒やの・・・朝のコ－ヒ---うまい・・・
der banning people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspending all refugee entry.
The measure,名前：東[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
- ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
All you need to know
Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, wrote on Twitter that Monday's ruling was "devastating news".
But she added: "It's impor | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ tant to remember that the Supreme Court has NOT addressed the legal merits of the latest Muslim Ban nor the human impacts w/its order today."
"The fight continues."
How have Trump travel bans fared?
The president's travel bans hして声優の野水伊ave each been frustrated by the courts to some degree:
In January, he signed an or which also banned Syrian refugees indefinitely, prompted protests and multiple legal challenges
A revised version in March removed Iraq from the list and lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees. It also exempted green card holders and dual citizens.
By June, the Supreme Court allowed most of it to go into effect, including a 120-day ban on all refu
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ― | |
| ´ ＼
1 |´ |￣―-- ＿＿＿＿
alted refugee resettlement for 120 days and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely.
The travel ban was later blocked by federal courts.
The revised order in March removed Iraq from the list, after it agreed to boost co-operation with the US, and it also lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees.
In June, the Supreme Court allowed that version of the policy to take partial effect.
In its ruling the court said: "In practical terms, this means that [the executive order] may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have a cre
dible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.
"All other foreign nationals are subject to the provisions of [the executive order]."
The rulin .／, - ､,―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――山奈央.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い歳織さんの浴衣姿やエッ
This is the government's third version of a controversial policy since Mr Trump took office in January.
Who is affected?
The latest presidential proclamation - which was issued in September - bans nationals of Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen from entering the US.
It also covers travellers from North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela. But lower courts had already allowed those provisions to take effect.
What happens now?
In its ruling on 4 December, the Supreme Court approved a request from Mr Trump's lawyers to lift partial restrictions on the ban imposed by lower courts.
It said those restrictions should now be put on hold while the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Virginia,
Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan and Libya - from entering the US for 90 days.
It also hg also said it would permit a 120-day ban on all refugees entering the US to go into effect, allowing the government to bar entry to refugee claiman
ts who do not have any "bona fide relationship" with an American individual or entity.
Meanwhile, Sudan was taken off the list in September.
Why were those countries chosen?
The latest travel ba ppens now?
In its ruling on 4 December, the Supreme Court approved a request from Mr Trump's lawyers to lift partial restrictions on the ban imposed by lower courts.
It said t
4時間足のセンターって抵抗するときは優秀だけど支えるときは頼りないんだよなぁ…
-1σあたりで待つか:::::::| で 地ment's third versio:::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''n of a controversial policy since Mr Trump took office in January.
Who is affected?
The latest presidential proclamation - which was issued in September - bans nationals of Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen from entering the US.
It also covers travellers from North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela. But lower courts had already allowed those provisions to take effect.
What hahose restrictions | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cAR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
should now be put on hold while the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, and the US Court of appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco, California, weigh the cases.
The two courts are expected to hear arguments in the coming days.
The Supreme Court's decision does not affect the lower courts' consideration of the merits of challenges to the latest travel ban.
What about the two pr 汚 i::::::::::::
The US Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's revised travel ban to go into full effect - even as legal challenges continue in lower courts.
This is the govern
evious versions of the ban?
The original order issued in January barred people from seven majority-Muslim countries - Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan and Libya - from entering the US for 90 days.
It ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>also halted refugee resettlement for 120 days and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely.
The travel ban was late:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
::::
r blocked by federal courts.
The revised order in March removed Iraq from the list, after it agreed to boost co-operation with the US, and it also lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees.
In June, the Supreme Court allowed that version of the policy to take partial effect.
In its ruling the court said: "In practical terms, this means that [the executive order] may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have
a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.
:::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
::::
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ ..
／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌsidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States b
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 最近寝てるときばっか売買サインがでて全然トレードできん・・
昼夜逆転生活するしかないのか・・ 深夜の動きからしてここを抜けるかどうかやな（´・ω・`） 前：東In Executive Order 13780 of March 6, 2017 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States), on the
recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, I ordered a worldwide review of whether, and if so>>753
| - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒
tionals seeking to enter the United States pose a security or safety threat. This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. As part of the review, the Secretary of Home
land Security established global requirements for information sharing in support of immigration screening and vetting. The Secretary of Homeland Security developed a comprehensive set of cr
iteria and applied it to the information-sharing practices, policies, and capabilities of foreig. The Secretary of State thereafteiewed in an effort to address deficiencies and a
chieve improvements. In many instances, those efforts produced positive results. By obtaining additionalmmitments from foreign governments, the United States Government has improve
d its capacity and ability to assess whether foreign nationals attempting to enter the United States pose a security or safety threat. Our Nation is safer as a result of this work.
､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○
Despite those efforts, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, has determined that a small number of countries -- out of nearly 200 evaluated -- r
emain deficient at this time with respect to their identity-management and information-sharing capabilities, protocols, and practices. In some cases, these countries also have a significant terrorist presence within their territory.
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. I am committed to our ongoing efforts to engage those countries willing to
cooperate, improve information-sharing and identity-management protocols ad I commend them for these efforts.
But until they satisfactorily address the identified inadequacies, I have decurity and other members of my Cabinet, to impose certain conditional restrictions and limitations, as set forth more fully b
elow, on entry into the United States of nationals of the countries identified in section 2 of this proclamation.
Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in
this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the
United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions. I therefore hereby proclaim the following:
Section 1. Policy and Purpose. (a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks and other public-safety threats. Screening and vetting protocols a
nd procedures associated with visa adjudications and other immigration processes play a critical role in implementing that policy. They enhance our ability to detect foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts
of terrorism, or otherwise pose a safety threat, and they aid our efforts to prevent such individuals from entering the United States.
山奈央[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
.／, --＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い歳して声優の野水伊織さんの浴衣姿やエッ >>753
東京時間終わってから
15時ー21時までＹ
22時あたりから参戦でも十分稼げる
夜中3時くらいまで起きなきゃいけんけどな ernments, including information about known or suspected terrorists and criminal-history information. It is, therefore, the policy of the United States to take all necessary and appropriate steps to en
courage foreign governments to improve their information-sharing and identity-management protocols and practices and to regularly share identity and threat information with our immigration screening and vetting systems.
(c) Section 2(a) of Executive Order 13780 directed a "worldwide review to identify whether, and if so what, additional information will be needed from each foreign country to adjudicate an appl
ication by a national of that country for a visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat." That
>>757
央[なおぼう] 投稿日：1 名前：東山奈201
.／, - ､,
- ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤
｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀-
○- ´ ／ ヽ |
優の野水 | - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ>>758
∩ 人｀､
| ＿.- ´ | 7/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
＿＿＿＿.| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―-
-―― ´ヽ ＿ んの浴衣／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--―
￣| /
良い歳して声伊織さ姿やエッ>>759
(b) Information-sharing and identity-management protocols and practices of foreign governments are important for the effectiveness of the screening and vetting protocols and procedures of the United Stat
es. Governments manage the identity and travel documents of their nationals and residents. They also control the circumstances under which they provide information about their nationals to other gov
review culminated in a report submitted to the President by the Secretary of Homeland Security on July 9, 2017. In that review, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Se
cretary othreat. That baseline incorporates three categories of criteria:
(i) Identity-management information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide the information needed to determine whether individuals seeking benefits under the immigr
ation laws are who they claim to be. The identity-management information category focuses on the integrity of documents required for travel to the United States. The criteria assessed in th
is category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedded with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen passports to appropriate entities, and makes
available upon request identity-related information not included in its passports.
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide information about whether persons who seek entry to this country pose nation
al security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country makes available, directly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and criminal-history in
formation upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the country impedes the United States Government's receipt of informati
on about passengers and crew traveling to the United State ショッター逃げるんだーーー早くぅぅーーー今ならまだ間に合う 勢いよく行くなら21:30くらいに113.10アタックかな
その後112.80サポでFIX高猫がLにとって理想の安心だな うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ 東山奈央[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
Israel says it is legally there as a result of a defensive war, and did not take control of the West Bank from a legitimate sovereign power.
It says the legal right of Jewish settlement there as recognised by the 1922 League of Nations Mandate for Palestine was preserved under the UN's charter.
Up until Donald Trump took office, the US had described the settlements as "illegitimate"
, refraining from calling them "illegal" since the Carter administration in 1980.
A UN Security Council resolution in December 2016 said settlements had "no legal validity and constitute[d] a flagrant violation under international law".
However, like previous resolutions on Israel, those adopted under Chapter VI of the
What makes Jerusalem a special case?
Har Homa settlementImage copyrightAFP
Image caption
Israel does not regard places like Har Homa in East Jerusalem as settlements
>>763
Even if agreement could be reached on settlements in the West Bank, the issue of settlements in East Jerusalem is even more thorny.
Israel regards East Jerusalem as its eternal, indivisible capital and does not consider
the sector in any way occupied - and by extension, it does not regard Jewish neighbourhoods there as settlements.
East Jerusalem map
Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, in a move not recognised internationally.
While it has previously agreed to temporarily freeze settlement-building in the West Bank,
it has ruled out a similar halt in East Jerusalem.
So is a deal on settlements impossible?>>764
Remains of the former Gaza Strip Jewish settlement of Netzarim, which was destroyed by
the Israeli army before its withdrawal in 2005 (24 January 2006)Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
＿＿＿＿
Israel demolished its settlements in Gaza before it withdrew in 2005
Not necessarily, despite appearing insurmountable. Israel has said it is prepared to make "painful concessions"
for peace, and it has previously shown it will relinquish settlements - such as in Sinai and Gaza, and four small sites in the West Bank in 2005.
It has agreed to negotiate the fate of existing settlements, and Jerusalem, as part of permanent status talks.
Israel has said in any final deal it intends to keep the largest settlement blocs, which are close to the pre-1967 ceasefire line.
This position seemed to get the endorsement of the US under former President George W Bush, who,
in a letter to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2004, said it was "unrealistic" to expect a full withdrawal from the West Bank in a final peace deal.
Opinion among Israeli Jews on whether to withdraw from settlements is fairly even.
According to a June 2016 poll, 43% said they would support pulling out from all but the major settlement blocs
as part of a peace agreement with the Palestinians, as opposed to 46% who said they would vote against a withdrawal.
>>768However, the current Israeli coalition government strongly supports the settler movement and there have been calls
by some political figures to annex parts of the West Bank rather than withdraw.
Are settlements illegal under international law?
UN Security Council votes for Resolution 2334 (23/12/16)Image copyrightAFP
Image caption
Israel and the UN have repeatedly clashed over the issue of settlements
>>770
Most of the international community, including the UN and the International Court of Justice, say the settlements are illegal.
The basis for this is the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention which forbids the transfer by an occupying power of its people into occupied territory.
However, Israel says the Fourth Geneva Convention does not apply de jure to the West Bank because, it says, the territory is not technically occupied.
UN Charter are not legally binding 4時間足上方チャネル下限で２５ＭＡ突き刺して反発してるんだから
これ弱そうに見えて相当強いぞ・・
素人が時間足とかみてうっかり売っちゃうパティーン The national security and public-safety risk assessment
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide information about whether persons who seek entry to this country p
ose national security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country makes availa
ble, directly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and c
riminal-history information upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the country impedes the United States Government'
s recei>>374
｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' :::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
e described in subsection (c) of this section. The assessment focused, in particular, on identity management, security and public-safety threats, and national security risks.
Through this assessment, the agencies measured each country's performance w香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. :::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cAR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ◎-◎一>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(i) Identity-management information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide the information needed to determine whether individuals seeking benefits under
the immigration laws are who they claim to be. The identity-management information category focuses on the integrity of documents required for travel to the United States.
The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedded with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen pa
ssports to appropriate entities, and makes available upon request identity-related information not included in its passports.
pt of information about passengers and crew traveling to the United States.
(iii) National security and public-safety risk assessment. category focuses on national security risk indicators. The criteria a
ssessed in this category include whether the country is a known or potential terrorist safe haven, whether it is a participant in the Visa Waiver Program established under section 217
of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187, that meets all of its requirements, and whether it regularly fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States.
(d) The Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Department of State, collected data on the performance of all foreign governments and assessed each country agai
nst the baselinith respect to issuing reliable travel documents and implementing adequate identity-management and inform
ation-sharing protocols and procedures, and evaluated terrorism-related and public-safety risks associated with foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States from each country.
(e) The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. The Secretary of Homeland Security identified 16 countrie
s as being "inadequate" based on an analysis of their identity-management protocols, information-sharing practices, and risk factors. Thirty-one additional coun
tries were classified "at risk" of becoming "inadequate" based on those criteria.
countries agreed to share information on known or suspected terrorists. ショッター逃げるんだーーー早くぅぅーーー今ならまだ間に合う 下手するとメリケンタイムで日足25ＭＡ突破もありうる・・ やっぱりポジ持ったらストップと利食い決めてそんなにチャート見ない方がいいのかね
ちょっと逆行しただけで損切っちゃうから負けばっかりなんだな やっぱりポジ持ったらストップと利食い決めてそんなにチャート見ない方がいいのかね
ちょっと逆行しただけで損切っちゃうから負けばっかりなんだな SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Nos. 16?1436 (16A1190) and 16?1540 (16A1191)
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL.>>184
No. 16?1436 (16A1190) v.
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, ET AL.No. 16?1540 (16A1191) v.
HAWAII, ET AL.ON APPLICATION FOR STAY AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
[June 26, 2017] JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE ALITO and
JUSTICE GORSUCH join, concurring in part and dissenting
in part.
I agree with the Court that the preliminary injunctionsentered in these cases should be stayed, although I would
stay them in full. The decision whether to stay the injunctions
is committed to our discretion, ante, at 9?10, but ourdiscretion must be “guided by sound legal principles,”
Nken v. Holder, 556 U. S. 418, 434 (2009) (internal quotation
marks omitted). The two “most critical” factors wemust consider in deciding whether to grant a stay are
“(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing
that [it] is likely to succeed on the merits” and“(2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured
THOMAS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part
2 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT
Opinion of THOMAS, J.absent a stay.” Ibid. (internal quotation marks omitted).
Where a party seeks a stay pending certiorari, as here, the
applicant satisfies the first factor only if it can show both
>>185
“a reasonable probability that certiorari will be granted”and “a significant possibility that the judgment below will
be reversed.” Barnes v. E-Systems, Inc. Group Hospital
Medical & Surgical Ins. Plan, 501 U. S. 1301, 1302 (1991)(Scalia, J., in chambers). When we determine that those
critical factors are satisfied, we must “balance the equities”
by “explor[ing] the relative harms to applicant and
respondent, as well as the interests of the public at large.”Id., at 1304?1305 (internal quotation marks omitted); cf.
Nken, supra, at 435 (noting that the factors of “assessing
the harm to the opposing party and weighing the public
interest” “merge when the Government is the opposingparty”).
The Government has satisfied the standard for issuing a
stay pending certiorari. We have, of course, decided to
grant certiorari. See ante, at 8?9. And I agree with theCourt’s implicit conclusion that the Government has made
a strong showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits?that
is, that the judgments below will be reversed.>>186
The Government has also established that failure to staythe injunctions will cause irreparable harm by interfering
with its “compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”
Ante, at 13. Finally, weighing the Government’s
interest in preserving national security against the hardshipscaused to respondents by temporary denials of entry
into the country, the balance of the equities favors the
Government. I would thus grant the Government’s applicationsfor a stay in their entirety. 金融量子力学を学んだワイからすればこのスレのレベル低すぎだはwww お前らの最高のオンギ、
聞かせてよ(*´91｀*) アメリカが利上げしたら世界的な祭りは終わりだ
パウエルショックくっぞ！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！ なんか昨日の夜から上がると見せかけて下げ
下がると見せかけて上げてる気がする。
112.30から113.10
どちらに抜けるのやら On June 14, evidently in response to the argument that
§2(c) was about to expire, President Trump issued a memorandum
to Executive Branch officials. The memorandum
declared the effective date of each enjoined provision of
EO?2 to be the date on which the injunctions in these
cases “are lifted or stayed with respect to that provision.”>>144
Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the
Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security,
and the Director of National Intelligence (June 14, 2017).
The memorandum further provided that, to the extent
necessary, it “should be construed to amend the Executive
Order.” Ibid. The Government takes the view that, if any>>784
mootness problem existed previously, the President’s
memorandum has cured it.The parties have since completed briefing, with the
Government requesting that we construe its supplemental
brief in Hawaii as a petition for certiorari. There is no
objection from respondents, and we do so. Both petitionsfor certiorari and both stay applications are accordingly
ripe for consideration.IIThe Government seeks review on several issues. In
IRAP, the Government argues that respondent Doe lacks
standing to challenge §2(c).* The Government also contends
that Doe’s Establishment Clause claim fails on the
merits. In its view, the Fourth Circuit should not have>>785
asked whether §2(c) has a primarily religious purpose.
The court instead should have upheld EO?2 because it
rests on the “facially legitimate and bona fide” justification
of protecting national security. Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408
??????*On June 24, 2017, this Court received a letter from counsel for Doe
advising that Doe’s wife received an immigrant visa on or about June
22, 2017. The parties may address the significance of that development
at the merits stage. It does not affect our analysis of the stay issues in
these cases.
8 TRUMP v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE
PROJECT
Per Curiam
U. S. 753, 770 (1972). In addition, the Fourth Circuit
erred by focusing on the President’s campaign-trail comments
to conclude that §2(c)?religiously neutral on its>>786
face?nonetheless has a principally religious purpose. At
the very least, the Government argues, the injunction is
too broad.In Hawaii, the Government likewise argues that respondents
Hawaii and Dr. Elshikh lack standing and that(at a minimum) the injunction should be narrowed. The
Government’s principal merits contention pertains to a
statutory provision authorizing the President to “suspend
the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” to this country“[w]henever [he] finds that the entry of any aliens or of
any class of aliens . . . would be detrimental to the interests
of the United States.” 8 U. S. C. §1182(f ). The Ninth
Circuit held that “[t]here is no sufficient finding in [EO?2>>787
>>794
that the entry of the excluded classes would be detrimentalto the interests of the United States.” Hawaii,
2017 WL 2529640, at *14. This, the Government argues,
constitutes impermissible judicial second-guessing of thePresident’s judgment on a matter of national security.
In addition to seeking certiorari, the Government asksthe Court to stay the injunctions entered below, thereby
permitting the enjoined provisions to take effect. According
to the Government, it is likely to suffer irreparable ここでL発射ーーーー押したとこで軽ぅぅーーく、L発射で蔵が建つ 白川時代からやってるけど、FIXガラって円高中のサインなんだよな
でも週末の件でまた流れ変わったし
リアル潮目
両目線持つと自分にいい聞かせてよう
おい俺、Sするタイミングだけは逃すなよ！ Ｓするとしたら4時間足上方チャネル上限でするか（113.5-6）
上方チャネル下抜け確定してからでないと うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ ppens now?
In its ruling on 4 December, the Supreme Court approved a request from Mr Trump's lawyers to lift partial restrictions on the ban imposed by lower courts.
It said t
4時間足のセンターって抵抗するときは優秀だけど支えるときは頼りないんだよなぁ…
-1σあたりで待つか:::::::| で 地ment's third versio:::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''n of a controversial policy since Mr Trump took office in January.
Who is affected?
The latest presidential proclamation - which was issued in September - bans nationals of Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen from entering the US.
It also covers travellers from North Korea and certain government officials from Venezuela. But lower courts had already allowed those provisions to take effect.
What hahose restrictions | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cAR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
should now be put on hold while the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, and the US Court of appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco, California, weigh the cases.
The two courts are expected to hear arguments in the coming days.
The Supreme Court's decision does not affect the lower courts' consideration of the merits of challenges to the latest travel ban.
What about the two pr 汚 i::::::::::::
The US Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's revised travel ban to go into full effect - even as legal challenges continue in lower courts.
This is the govern
evious versions of the ban?
The original order issued in January barred people from seven majority-Muslim countries - Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan and Libya - from entering the US for 90 days.
It ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>also halted refugee resettlement for 120 days and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely.
The travel ban was late:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
::::
r blocked by federal courts.
The revised order in March removed Iraq from the list, after it agreed to boost co-operation with the US, and it also lifted the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees.
In June, the Supreme Court allowed that version of the policy to take partial effect.
In its ruling the court said: "In practical terms, this means that [the executive order] may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have
a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.
:::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
::::
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ ..
／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌsidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States b
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; やはり予言どうり70超えれんのかここからまた111か 相場ってのはやな(・Д・)
どれだけ早よ【歪み】捉えられるか言うんが勝ち負けになるんじゃ馬鹿たれ(・Д・)
【歪み】見つけたらワシは食いついて放さんど！(・Д・)
犬になれ！馬鹿が！無職が！(・Д・) これ、ずーっとサゲ続けるやつや！
やつや！やつや！
(´・1・｀) 時間足25ＭＡでちょっと叩かれるかもしれんけど
20ＥＭＡをサポートにして突破するよこれ Sec. 7. Effective Dates. Executive Order 13780 ordered a temporary pause on the entry of foreign nationals from certain foreign countries.
In two cases, however, Federal courts have enjoined those restrictions.
The Supreme Court has stayed those injunctions as to foreign nationals who
lack a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity
in the United States, pending its review of the decisions of the lower courts.
(a) The restrictions and limitations established in section 2 of this proclamation
are effective at 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time on September 24, 2017, for foreign nationals who:
(i) were subject to entry restrictions under section 2 of Executive Order 13780,
or would have been subject to the restrictions but for section 3 of that Executive Order, and
(ii) lack a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a perso
n or entity in the United States.
(b) The restrictions and limitations established in section
2 of this proclamation are effective at 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight t
ime on October 18, 2017, for all other persons subject to this proclamation, including nationals of:
(i) Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Somalia who have a credible claim
of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States; and
(ii) Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela.
Sec. 8. Severability. It is the policy of the United States t
o enforce this proclamation to the maximum extent possible to
advance the national security, foreign policy, and counterterrorism interests of the United States. Accordingly:
(a) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of an
y provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the
remainder of this proclamation and the application of its other provision
s to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby; and
(b) if any provision of this proclamation, or the application of any
provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the lack of certain procedural requirements,
the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements to conform with existing law and with any applicable court orders.
Sec. 9. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this proclamation sha
ll be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or a
gency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This proclamation shall be implemented consistent with applicable
law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This proclamation is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States,
its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of September,
in the year of our Lord two thousand seventeen, and of the Independence of the United States
of America the two hundred and forty-second. >>788
学んだ位で何ってんだおめぇらは！
儂なんぞ中学校中退翌年に留学しとったわハゲ！
〆 ⌒ ヽ
(´・ω・｀)9m 未だにソリティアっていうカードゲームのルールがわかんないよな
あとマインスーパー 113.2-4くらい付けねえと、まともな下げも来ない気がする おてぃんてぃんが上を向き始めたので、ここでＬと出ました。 (B) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts
with the United States but is outside the United States on the applicable
effective date under section 7 of this proclamation for work, study, or other lawful activity;
(A) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States
for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity
, is outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section
7 of this proclamation, seeks to reenter the United States to resume tha
t activity, and the denial of reentry would impair that activity;
(C) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant
business or professional obligations and the denial of entry would impair those obligations;
(D) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside>>818
with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United
States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid
nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry would cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(E) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual>>819
needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
(F) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United
States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee),
and the foreign national can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;
(G) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international
organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities
Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings
or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA;
>>820
(H) the foreign national is a Canadian permanent resident who applie
s for a visa at a location within Canada;
(I) the foreign national is traveling as a United States
Government-sponsored exchange visitor; or
>>821
>>823
(J) the foreign national is traveling to the United States, at the request of a United States
Government department or agency, for legitimate law enforcement, foreign policy, or national security purposes.
Sec. 4. Adjustments to and Removal of Suspensions and Limitations.
(a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State,
devise a process to assess whether any suspensions and limitations imposed by section 2 of t
his proclamation should be continued, terminated, modified, or supplemented. The process shall account f
or whether countries have improved their identity-management and information-sharing protocols and procedure
s based on the criteria set forth in section 1 of this proclamation and the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017.
Within 180 days of the date of this proclamation, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with
the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies,
shall submit a report with recommendations to the President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, regarding the following: >>823
全部売れは買いの指標だが下がってるから当たってないって事？ >>822
すぐ損切りしたくなるようなレバでやるからやで .60-.70レンジでバンドウォークしてくのが見えますね (iii) I am adopting a more tailored approach with respect to nonimmigrants,
in accordance with the recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security.
For some countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline
described in subsection (c) of this section, I am restricting the entry of all nonimmigrants.
For countries with certain mitigating factors, such as a willingness to
cooperate or play a substantial role in combatting terrorism, I am restricting t
he entry only of certain categories of nonimmigrants, which will mitigate the security
threats presented by their entry into the United States. In those cases in which future
cooperation seems reasonably likely, and accounting for foreign policy, national security,
and counterterrorism objectives, I have tailored the restrictions to encourage such improvements.
>>24
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provided that the
"Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security
may also submit to the President the names of additional countries fo
r which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations
deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States."
The Secretary of Homeland Security determined that Somalia generally
satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described
in subsection (c) of this section, but its government's inability to effective
ly and consistently cooperate, combined with the terrorist threat that
emanates from its territory, present
into the United States. Somalia's identity-management deficiencies
and the significant terrorist presence within its territory make it a
source of particular risks to the national security and public safety
of the United States. Based on the considerations mentioned above,
and as described further in section 2(h) of this proclamation, I have
determined that entry restrictions, limitations, and other measure
s designed to ensure proper screening and vetting for nationals of
Somalia are necessary for the security and welfare of the United States.
>>25
(j) Section 2 of this proclamation describes some of the
inadequacies that led me to impose restrictions on the specified
countries. Describing all of those reasons publicly, however, would
cause serious damage to the national security of the United States,
and many such descriptions are classified.
>>27
Sec. 2. Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Identified Concern.
The entry into the United States of nationals of the following countries is hereby
suspended and limited, as follows, subject to categorical exception
s and case by-case waivers, as described in sections 3 and 6 of this proclamation:
(a) Chad. >>27
>>28
>>29
>>30
(i) The government of Chad is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner
of the United States, and the United States Government looks forward to expanding t
hat cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Chad
has shown a clear willingness to improve in these areas. Nonetheless, Chad does not
adequately share public-safety and terrorism-related information and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
Additionally, several terrorist groups are active within Chad or in the surrounding region, including elements
of Boko Haram, ISIS-West Africa, and al-Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb. At this time, additional information
sharing to identify those foreign nationals applying for visas or seeking entry into the United States who
represent national security and public-safety threats is necessary given
the significant terrorism-related risk from this country. >>813
歪みって何ですか？
もｔっと詳しく教えてください っつっても、まだ60pipsでしょ。
誤差だよ。ポン様からすれば。 きたか…!!
＿ /￣￣￣/
＼/＿＿＿/
( ﾟдﾟ ) ｶﾞﾀｯ
.r ヾ
＿_|_| |_|
￣￣￣￣￣￣ うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ ernments, including information about known or suspected terrorists and criminal-history information. It is, therefore, the policy of the United States to take all necessary and appropriate steps to en
courage foreign governments to improve their information-sharing and identity-management protocols and practices and to regularly share identity and threat information with our immigration screening and vetting systems.
(c) Section 2(a) of Executive Order 13780 directed a "worldwide review to identify whether, and if so what, additional information will be needed from each foreign country to adjudicate an appl
ication by a national of that country for a visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat." That
>>757
央[なおぼう] 投稿日：1 名前：東山奈201
.／, - ､,
- ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤
｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀-
○- ´ ／ ヽ |
優の野水 | - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ>>835
∩ 人｀､
| ＿.- ´ | 7/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
＿＿＿＿.| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―-
-―― ´ヽ ＿ んの浴衣／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--―
￣| /
良い歳して声伊織さ姿やエッ>>836
(b) Information-sharing and identity-management protocols and practices of foreign governments are important for the effectiveness of the screening and vetting protocols and procedures of the United Stat
es. Governments manage the identity and travel documents of their nationals and residents. They also control the circumstances under which they provide information about their nationals to other gov
review culminated in a report submitted to the President by the Secretary of Homeland Security on July 9, 2017. In that review, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Se
cretary othreat. That baseline incorporates three categories of criteria:
(i) Identity-management information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide the information needed to determine whether individuals seeking benefits under the immigr
ation laws are who they claim to be. The identity-management information category focuses on the integrity of documents required for travel to the United States. The criteria assessed in th
is category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedded with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen passports to appropriate entities, and makes
available upon request identity-related information not included in its passports.>>838
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide information about whether persons who seek entry to this country pose nation
al security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country makes available, directly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and criminal-history in
formation upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the country impedes the United States Government's receipt of informati
on about passengers and crew traveling to the United State 今週の高値を113.30付近に水木あたりに作って
雇用で再アタックして超えれず落ちてくイメージができつつある えぇっ!? ここでブイモンキーかい？
ミ~￣￣￣＼
/ ＿＿＿＿亅
/ ＞ ⌒ ⌒ |
｜/ (･) (･) |
(６――○-○- |
｜ つ |
｜ ＿＿_)/
＼ (＿／ /
／＼＿＿／
/ ＼><∧
/ / Ｖ | |
/_/ | | |
⊂ﾆu＼＿_／L|⊃
｜ / /
｜ / /
｜ / /
(ﾆフフ The national security and public-safety risk assessment
(ii) National security and public-safety information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide information about whether persons who seek entry to this country p
ose national security or public-safety risks. The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country makes availa
ble, directly or indirectly, known or suspected terrorist and c
riminal-history information upon request, whether the country provides passport and national-identity document exemplars, and whether the country impedes the United States Government'
s recei>>374
｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' :::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::>>844
:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
e described in subsection (c) of this section. The assessment focused, in particular, on identity management, security and public-safety threats, and national security risks.
Through this assessment, the agencies measured each country's performance w香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. :::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN>>845
/cAR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ◎-◎一>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(i) Identity-management information. The United States expects foreign governments to provide the information needed to determine whether individuals seeking benefits under
the immigration laws are who they claim to be. The identity-management information category focuses on the integrity of documents required for travel to the United States.
The criteria assessed in this category include whether the country issues electronic passports embedded with data to enable confirmation of identity, reports lost and stolen pa
ssports to appropriate entities, and makes available upon request identity-related information not included in its passports.
pt of information about passengers and crew traveling to the United States>>846
.
(iii) National security and public-safety risk assessment. category focuses on national security risk indicators. The criteria a
ssessed in this category include whether the country is a known or potential terrorist safe haven, whether it is a participant in the Visa Waiver Program established under section 217
of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187, that meets all of its requirements, and whether it regularly fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States.
(d) The Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Department of State, collected data on the performance of all foreign governments and assessed each country agai
nst the baselinith respect to issuing reliable travel documents and implementing adequate identity-management and inform
ation-sharing protocols and procedures, and evaluated terrorism-related and public-safety risks associated with foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States from each country.
(e) The Department of Homeland Security evaluated each country against the baseline described in subsection (c) of this section. The Secretary of Homeland Security identified 16 countrie
s as being "inadequate" based on an analysis of their identity-management protocols, information-sharing practices, and risk factors. Thirty-one additional coun
tries were classified "at risk" of becoming "inadequate" based on those criteria.
countries agreed to share information on known or suspected terrorists.>>848 8月からのバックテストで右肩上がりのea出来たから喜んでたら6月からやったら二ヶ月で利益半分飛ばしやがった
いつになったら まともなea出きんだよ 「わかめ、今日の相場はワケわかめ」
「かつお、Ｓで担がれる」
「いくら、今日の負けはいくら？」
の３本です。 The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers
of wking of all institutions devoted to the care and education of children.
The Occupying Power shall take all necessary steps to facilitate the identification of children and the registration of
t
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.>>305
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security
of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement
of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons
it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes
as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.>>307
>>317
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent,
that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected
in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
heir parentage. It may not, in any case, change their personal status, nor enlist them in formations or organizations subordinate to it.
Should the local institutions be inadequate for the purpose, the Occupying Power shall make arrangements for the
maintenance and education, if possible by persons of their own nationality, language and religion, of children
who are orphaned or separated from their parents as a result of the war and who cannot be adequately cared for by a near relative or friend.
A special section of the Bureau set up in accordance with Article 136 [ Link ] shall be responsible for taking
all necessary steps to identify children whose identity is in doubt. Particulars of their parents or other near relatives should always be recorded if available.
The Occupying Power shall not hinderof any preferential measures in regard to food, medical
care and protection against the effects of war, which may have been adopted prior to the occupation in favour
of children under fifteen years, expectant mothers, and mothers of children under seven years.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to serve>>308
in its armed or auxiliary forces. No pressure or propaganda which aims at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to work unless they are over eighteen years of age,
and then only on work which is necessary either for the needs of the army of occupation, or for the public utility
services, or for the feeding, sheltering, clothing, transportation or health of the population of the occupied country.
Protected persons may not be compelled to undertake any work which would involve them in the obligation of taking part in military operations.
The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to employ forcible means to ensure the security
of the installations where they are performing compulsory labour.>>310
The work shall be carried out only in the occupied territory where the persons whose services have been requisitioned are. >>801
軽くLしますた。113.6利確予定～。 えぇっ!? ここで究極ブイモンキーかい？
ミ~￣￣￣＼
/ ＿＿＿＿亅
/ ＞ ⌒ ⌒ |
｜/ (･) (･) |
(６――○-○- |
｜ つ |
｜ ＿＿_)/
＼ (＿／ /
／＼＿＿／
/ ＼><∧
/ / Ｖ | |
/_/ | | |
⊂ﾆu＼＿_／L|⊃
｜ / /
｜ / /
｜ / /
(ﾆフフ 前：東In Executive Order 13780 of March 6, 2017 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States), on the
recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, I ordered a worldwide review of whether, and if so>>753
| - | ― | |
| ´ | ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒
tionals seeking to enter the United States pose a security or safety threat. This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. As part of the review, the Secretary of Home
land Security established global requirements for information sharing in support of immigration screening and vetting. The Secretary of Homeland Security developed a comprehensive set of cr
iteria and applied it to the information-sharing practices, policies, and capabilities of foreig. The Secretary of State thereafteiewed in an effort to address deficiencies and a
chieve improvements. In many instances, those efforts produced positive results. By obtaining additionalmmitments from foreign governments, the United States Government has improve
d its capacity and ability to assess whether foreign nationals attempting to enter the United States pose a security or safety threat. Our Nation is safer as a result of this work.
､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○
Despite those efforts, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, has determined that a small number of countries -- out of nearly 200 evaluated -- r
emain deficient at this time with respect to their identity-management and information-sharing capabilities, protocols, and practices. In some cases, these countries also have a significant terrorist presence within their territory.
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. I am committed to our ongoing efforts to engage those countries willing to
cooperate, improve information-sharing and identity-management protocols ad I commend them for these efforts.
But until they satisfactorily address the identified inadequacies, I have decurity and other members of my Cabinet, to impose certain conditional restrictions and limitations, as set forth more fully b
elow, on entry into the United States of nationals of the countries identified in section 2 of this proclamation.
Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in
this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the
United States, and that their entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions. I therefore hereby proclaim the following:
Section 1. Policy and Purpose. (a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks and other public-safety threats. Screening and vetting protocols a
nd procedures associated with visa adjudications and other immigration processes play a critical role in implementing that policy. They enhance our ability to detect foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts
of terrorism, or otherwise pose a safety threat, and they aid our efforts to prevent such individuals from entering the United States.
山奈央[なおぼう] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
.／, --＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い歳して声優の野水伊織さんの浴衣姿やエッ えぇっ!? ここで究極ブイモンキーかい？
ミ~￣￣￣＼
/ ＿＿＿＿亅
/ ＞ ⌒ ⌒ |
｜/ (･) (･) |
(６――○-○- |
｜ つ |
｜ ＿＿_)/
＼ (＿／ /
／＼＿＿／
/ ＼><∧
/ / Ｖ | |
/_/ | | |
⊂ﾆu＼＿_／L|⊃
｜ / /
｜ / /
｜ / /
(ﾆフフ えぇっ!? ここで究極ブイモンキーかい？
ミ~￣￣￣＼
/ ＿＿＿＿亅
/ ＞ ⌒ ⌒ |
｜/ (･) (･) |
(６――○-○- |
｜ つ |
｜ ＿＿_)/
＼ (＿／ /
／＼＿＿／
/ ＼><∧
/ / Ｖ | |
/_/ | | |
⊂ﾆu＼＿_／L|⊃
｜ / /
｜ / /
｜ / /
(ﾆフフ よし、羽生が七冠取ったので記念にSするわ('A`) 頭持ち 口内射精 喉の奥
って彼女に送ったら爆笑してくれた
笑いのツボが浅くてエロい彼女って楽でいいねｗ >>845
113行く気しないでここ天井な気がする
んで雇用で111明確に割れてFOMCで108 ワイのような超絶理数系トレーダーやないと相場で継続して勝てへんでww 上に行って、下に行って、結局16時のスタート位置っていうオチ。 On September 15, 2017, the Secretary of Homeland Security submitted a report to me recommending entry restrict
ions and limitations o>>865
／￣￣￣＼
/ノ
／￣￣￣＼
/ノ / / ヽ
| / | __ /
| | |__ |
| | LL/ |__LﾊL |
＼L／ （・ヽ /・） Ｖ
/（ﾘ
⌒ (●●)⌒ ）
| 0| ﾄｪｪｪｲ ﾉ また騙されよったwwww
, -'ヽ＼ ヽニｿ ／ﾉ
acies and risks so that the restrictions and limitations imposed by this proclamation ma
y be relaxed or removed as soon ./ ヽ､＼＿＿ﾉ( ((
/ i ヽ、 / _ノ´｀ｰ -,,＿ _
./ .| .｀ｰ-;f" 、 ｲ/ `i
ヽ、 .ﾃ ＼xｰ.ｫ､__ノ
｀ヽ､ r' `
､_冫y"
/｀ーﾄ、 ヽ,＿ﾉ"ｰ'
.／, -
､, - ､ ￣ ヽ7/12/05(火) 01:37:46.1>>866
./-┤
｡|｡
|――-､ ヽ
an, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The Secretary of Homeland Security also assesses that Iraq did not meet the baseline, but that
entry restrictions and limitations under a Presidential proclamation are not warranted. The Secretary of Homeland Security recommends, however, that nationals o
f Iraq who seek to enter the United States be subject to additional scrutiny to determine if they pose risks to the national security or public safety of the
United States. In reaching these | ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| - | ― | |
| ´ |
｀ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣
ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.
| ￣ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良い優の野織さんの浴衣姿やエッ
(g) The Secretary of Homeland Security assesses that the following countries continue to have "inadequate" identity-management protocols, information-sharing practices
, and risk factors, with respect to the baseline1 名奈央[なおぼsubsection (c) of this section, such that entry restrictions and limitations are recommended:
Chd the democratically elected government of Iraq, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of United States forces
in Iraq, and Iraq's commitment to combating the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
(h) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to "submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclu
sion in a Presidential procう] 投 described in lamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the informa
tion requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately sha
ren certain nationals of 7 countries determined to be "inade
quate" in providing such information and 水伊in light of other factors discusse
d in the report. According to the rep前：東山ort, the recommended restrictions would help address the threats that the countries' identity-management protocols
, information-sharing inadequacies, and other risk factors pose to the security and welfare of the United States. The restrictions also encourage the co
untries to work wi歳して声th the United States to address tho
se inadequas possible.
red foreiy-specific restrictions that would be most likely to encourage cooperation given each country's distinct circumstances, and that wou ＿＿＿_
／ ＼ ,, /＼
／ （●） （●） ブイモンキーしないじゃん。
／ :::::⌒（__人__）⌒::＼
| |_/ |
.＼ ／
/⌒～"￣,￣￣〆⌒,ﾆつ
| ,＿_＿ﾞ＿__､rヾｲｿ⊃
| ｀l￣
| .| うわぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
逝ったぁああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああああ
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
■■■ 全部売れ！ ■■■
Nobel Prizes and Laureates Robert J. Shiller
ノーベル賞学者のロバート・シラー教授
■■■ 「株式市場の自己陶酔」を警戒すべき■■■
アメリカ株式市場は20％調整へ
Professor of Harvard Kennedy School Jeffrey Frankel
ハーバード大学のジェフリー・フランケル教授
■■■ 近いうちに大幅調整が来る■■■
在韓米軍家族の退避訴え
■■■ 北朝鮮と「衝突近づく」■■■
【ワシントン時事】2017/12/04-06:17
米共和党のグラム上院議員は３日、北朝鮮との軍事衝突が近づいているとの認識を示し、
「在韓米軍の家族を韓国国外に退避させるべき時が来た」と訴えた。
President Trump said he stands ready to “totally destroy” North Korea.
トランプ政権による対北朝鮮攻撃か
米の北朝鮮攻撃Ｘデー警戒
■■■第一候補のＸデーは１２月１８日■■■ ポンドルＳ１からの反発が弱いからまだまだ掘る気だな >>845
ワイも同じイメージや
決めつけはしないけど、うまく乗れるといいね >>858
. ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) すまんの。つかおまいどこのﾊｹﾞの骨やねん。 ◎-◎一distinguish between the entry >>408
igrants generally receive more extensive vetti
ng than nonimmigrants, such vetti
日
笠
陽子[ひよっち] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 06:01:09.08
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
ry of nationals of 7 countries found to be ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cwith respect to the baseli
ne described in subsection (c) of this section: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria
, Venezuela, and Yeme:::::::::::| で 地 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ ..>>408
>>407
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(ii) After reviewing the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 20
17, and accounting for the foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism objectives of the United States, I have determined to restrict and limit the ent
n. These restrictions of immigrants and nonimmigrants. Persons admitted on immigrant visas become lawful p
ermanent residents of the United States. Such persons may present national security or public-safety concerns that may be distinct from those admitted as noni
mmigrants. The United St汚 i::::::::::::
:::::::::::.ゝ ates affords lawful permanent residents more endu
ring rights than it does to nonimmigrants. Lawf
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←(AR0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ul permanent residents are more diff
icult to remove than nonim>>410
>>409
migrants even after national security concerns arise, which heightens the costs and dangers of errors associated with admitting such
individuals. And although immng is less reliable when the country from which s
omeone seeks to emigrate exhibits significant gaps in its identity-manage
ment or information-sharing policies, or presents risks to the national security of the
United States. For all but one of those 7 countries, therefore, I am restricting the entry of all immigrants.
／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿ ,/ﾆ>>
(iii) I am adopting a more tailored approach with respect to nonimmigrants, in accordance with the recommendations of the Secretary of Homeland Security. F
or some countries found to be "inadequate" with respect to the baseline describ
ed in subsection (c) of this section, I am restricting the entry of all nonim
migrants. For countries with certain mitigating factors, such as a willingness to c
ooperate or play a substantial role in combatting terrorism, I am restricting the
entry only of certain categories of nonimmigrants, which will mitigate the security th
reats presented by their entry int＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _) ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ o the United States. In those cases in which fut
ure cooperation seems reasonably likely, and accounting for foreign policy, national secu
rity, and counterterrorism objectives, I have tailored the restrictions to encourage such improvements.
(i) Section 2(e) of Executive Order 13780 also provi あぁ、すごい恩義を感じる
かつてないほどの恩義を感じるぞ 名子[っち] 投稿日笠陽：2017/ひよ12/051:09.08
:::::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
:::::::::::| で 地 ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
::: _＿ノ -◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ >>450(ii) The ent←( ry into the United States of nationals of Chad, as immigrants, and
as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(b) Iran. >>451
(i) Iran regularly fails前：日 to cooperate wi ' ● ' ﾆ ､ th the United States Government in identifying security risks, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion, is
the source of significant terrorist thr:::::::: 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い 香 菊 eats, and fails to receive its nationals subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The Department
of State has also designated Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism.
(ii) The entry into the United States of .ゝ 抜 nationals of Iran as immigrants and as nonimmigrants is hereby suspended, except that entry by such
nationals under val 汚 i::::::::::::
:::ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た id student (F and M) and exchange visitor (J) visas is not suspended, although such individuals should be subject to enhanced screening and vetting requirements.
(c) L ｡||-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ibya.>>452
(i) The government of Libya is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner of the United States, and the United States Governm
ent looks forward to expanding on that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management. Libya, nonetheless, faces
significant challenges i｡ヽn sharing several types of information, including public-safety and terrorism-related information necessary for the prot
ection of the national security and public safety oヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;f the United States. Libya also has significant inadequacies in its identity-management protoco
ls. Further, Libya fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion and has been assessed to be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nation
als subject to final orders of removal from the United States. The substantial terrorist presence within Libya's territory amplifies the risks posed by the entry into the United States of its nationals.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Libya, as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1), tourist (B-2), and
business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspende （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿d.
(d) Nort>>454 Korea. ::_|/`
(i) North Korea does not cooperate with the United States Government in any respect and fails to satisfy all information-sharing requirements.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of North Korea as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
(e) S>>456yria.
(i) Syria regularly fails to cooperate with the United States Government in identifying security risks, is the source of significant terrorist threats, and h
as been designated by the Department of State as a state sponsor of terrorism. Syria has significant inadequacies in identity-management proto
cols, fails to share public-safety and terrorism information, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
（-◎>>457>>460
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Syria as immigrants and nonimmigrants is hereby suspended.
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ すげー勢いで下抜けてきたあああああああああああああああああ (´･ω･`)･ω･`) ｷｬｰ
/ つ⊂ ＼ 怖いー して声
ational securitfic, Penal and Criminal Investigation Service Corps; the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service; and the Minist
ry of the Popular Power for Foreign Re1 名前奈う]＿
.／, - ､, - 投日：201/057：東山:46
＿＿＿ ､ ￣ ヽ
./-┤ ｡
|｡ |―- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣>>467
―-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀
- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
| -
| ― | |>>468
>>473
| ´ | ｀
ヽ . | |ヽ
∩ 人｀､ _ | ＿.￣￣ ノノ
＼
1 |´ |￣―--―― ´ヽ ＿ ／⌒＼
＼_ _/-―――.| （ Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣ 央ぼ } | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| /
良優の野織さん衣姿やエッVenezuela.
(i) Venezuela has adopted many of the baseline standards identified by the Secretary of Homeland Securit
y and in section 1 of this proclamation, but its government is uncooperative in verifying whether its citizens
pose ny or public-safety threats. Venezuela's government fails to share public-safety and ter
rorism-related information の浴adeq水伊uately, fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion, and has been assessed t
o be not fully cooperative with respect to receiving its nationaなおls subject to final orders of removal from the U
nited States. There are, ho>>475
>>476
>>478wever, alternative sources for obtaining information to verify the citizenship and id
entity of nationals from Vい歳enezuela. As a result, the restrictions imposed by this proclamation focus on govern
ment officials of Venezu
ela who are responsible for the identified inadequacies.
(ii) Notwithstanding section 3(b)(v) of this proclamation, the entry into the United States of officials of
agencies of Venezuela involved in screening and vetting procedures -- including the Ministry of the Popular Pow
er for Interior, Justice and Peace; the Administrative Service of Identification, Migration and Immigration; the Scie
ntilatio
ns -- and their immediate family members, as nonimmigrants on busine
ss (B-1), tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended. Further, nationals of Venezuela
who are visa holders >>471
should be subject to appropriate additional measures to ensure traveler information remains current.
(g) Yemen.
(i) The government of Yemen is an important and valuable counterterrorism partner, and the United States
Government looks forward to expanding that cooperation, including in the areas of immigration and border management.
Yemen, nonetheless, faces significant identity-management challenges, which are amplified by the notable terrorist presence within its territory.
The government of Yemen fails to satisfy critical identity-management requirements, does not share public-safety
and terrorism-related information adequately, and fails to satisfy at least one key risk criterion.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Yemen as immigrants, and as nonimmigrants on business (B-1),
tourist (B-2), and business/tourist (B-1/B-2) visas, is hereby suspended.
(h) Somalia. . ﾉｼ
(´･ω･`) 毎日これかよ。ﾛﾝｶｽも好きねぇ。 >>878
今夜はピザよ、アナタ。v(´･ω･`)v 敢えてポンドル買ってみたw
15ピピ損切りなら死なんだろ 窓梅するんだかしないんだか、あいかわらず動かし方がうまいなあ。 >>869
可能性はあるね
念のためそうなるパターンも考慮してるけど
有名な人がFOMCまで下がるって予想してるみたいだし ries in the degree to which its government lacks command and control of its territory, which greatly limits
the effectiveness of its national capabilities in a variety of respects. Terrorists use under-governed areas in
northern, central日
笠よっ
ち] 投
稿
日：>>495:::::::::/ ヽ::::::::::::
陽子[ひ:::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
:香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ::::::::::.ゝ 抜 美 前 ﾉ:::::::::::
:::::::::::/ い ﾞi ::::::>>896
＼_ な ,,-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` '
● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人>>897
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎
-◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NR
N/cA
R
0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿====
（ i）==
::::／ ,/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
(i) The Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017, determined tha
t Somalia satisfies the information-sharing requirements of the baseline described in section 1(
c) of this proclamation. But several other considerations support imposing entry restrictions and
limitations on Somalia. Somalia has significant identity-management deficiencies. For example,
while Somalianited States and many other countries do not
recognize it. A persistent terrorist threat also emanates from Somalia's territory. The United Stat
es Govern>>505ment has identified Somalia as a terrorist safe haven. Somalia stands apart from other count
, and southern Somalia as safe havens from which to plan, facilitate, and conduct their operations. S
omalia also remains a destination for individuals attempting to join terrorist groups that threaten the national security o
f the United States. The Stports on Terrorism observed that Somalia has not sufficient
ly degraded the ability of terrorist groups to plan and mount attacks from its territory. Further, despite having made signific
ant progress toward formally federating its member states, and its willingness to fight terrorism, Somalia continues to struggl
e to provide the governance needed to limit terrorists' freedom of movement, access to resources, and capacity to operate. The
government of Somalia's lack of territorial control also comp
romises Somalia's ability, already limited because of poor recordkeeping, to share information about its nationals who pose criminal
or terrorist risks. As a result of these and other factors, Somalia presents special concerns that distinguish it from other countries.
(ii) The entry into the United States of nationals of Somalia as immigrants is hereby suspended. Additionally, visa adjudications for n
ationals of Somalia and decisions regarding their entry as nonimmigrants should be subject to additional scrutiny to determine if applica
nts are connected to terrorist organizations or otherwise pose a threat to the national security or public safety of the United States.
Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspensions and Limitations. (a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this
section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspensions of and limitations on entry pursuant to section 2 of this proclam
ation shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:
(i) are outside the United States on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation;
(ii) do not have a valid visa on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation; and
(iii) do not qualify for a visa or other valid travel document under section 6(d) of this proclamation. ほら予言どうり
俺が上で捕まってる時ってまず予言はずれないから(笑)
確実に今日112割れるよ >>875
2017/12/05(火) 12:17:33.15
who already have permanent residence will not have to pay to apply for settled status.
Those making a first time application for the right to stay after Brexit, however, will face a charge - reportedly similar to the cost of applying for a passport.
Settled status will grant those who have spent five years in the UK equal rights on healthcare, education, benefits and pensions to British citizens.
Ministers have already suggested people legally resident in the UK before an as yet unspecified cut-off date
Leading Brexiteer Jacob Rees-Mogg said that the Conservatives were "as one" with the DUP on the importance of keeping the United Kingdom together,
and the mood among Tory MPs in the meeting was "contented, not divisive or unhappy".
抜 美
Backbench Remain supporter Anna Soubry said no Conservative MP wanted Northern Ireland treated differently from the rest of the UK, which she said would be "a gift" to the Scottish National Party.
The "simple solution" would be for the whole of the UK to remain in the single market and customs union, she added.
Lib Dem Brexit spokesman Tom Brake said: "As each day goes by, it becomes clearer that the best deal for everyone is to stay in Europe.
On the "divorce bill", the UK is understood to have recently increased its offer, which could be worth up to 50bn euros (￡44bn).
Reality Check: How do you work out the Brexit bill?
On the issue of rights for the three million EU citizens in Britain, the UK has agreed that those
will be allowed to stay and they want to make the process "as easy as renewing a driving licence".
Brexit: All you need to know
:::::::::::/ ヽ:::::::::::: :::::::::::| で 地 汚 i::::::::::::
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyne real reason for today's failure is the grubby deal the government did with the DUP after the election."
He added that "Labour has been clear from the outset that we need a jobs-first Brexit deal that works for the whole of the United Kingdom".
Scottish First Minister Nicola Snd was allowed to operate under different rules there was "surely no good practical reason" why other parts of the UK could not do
the same - a message echoed by Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
>>1
Conservative MPs emerging from a Downing Street briefing on the talks said they had been told Mrs May had not agreed the proposal on regulatory alignment put forward by the Irish government.
The people of the UK must be given a vote on the deal and an opportunity to exit from Brexit."
:::.ゝ 抜 美
前 ﾉ::::::::::::::::::::::/ い 香 菊 ｲ:::::::::::::
::::: | た ﾞi ::::::
＼_ な ,,>>878-'
――--､..,ヽ_。 ＿,,-''
:::::::,-‐､,‐､ヽ. )ノ
:::::_|/ ｡|
｡ヽ|-i､ .. ／￣￣￣￣
／. ` ' ● ' ﾆ ､ （＿＿＿＿人
ニ ＿_ｌ＿_＿ノ （-◎-
◎一
/￣ ＿ | i （ (_ _)>>883
|(￣`' ）/ / ,.. （ ε （∴←( ﾟ∀
ﾟ)o彡゜ ◆NRN/cA
R0PM
`ー---―' / '（__ ） ヽ＿＿＿＿
====（ i）==::::／ ,
/ﾆ>>
:/ ヽ:::i /;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
UK political reaction
Where the talks are at
The EU says it will only recommend the start of talks about future trade arrangements when it deems "sufficient progress"
has been made on three issues - the status of expat citizens, the "divorce" bill and the Northern Ireland border.
The UK has been set a deadline of this week to come forward with an improved offer on them,
and hopes that the go-ahead for future talks will then be given at an EU leaders' summit on 14-15 December. 上重いけど、売っても儲かんねえから
相当引き付けねえとな 茅野愛衣[かやのん] 投稿日：2017/12/05(火) 12:17:33.15
「￣￣了
l h「￢丨 ＜日本語くらいわかれよアニ豚>>897声豚基地外>>898屑ニート>>899のID:RH7HOye50
(C) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or
professional obligations and the denial of entry would impair those obligations;
(D) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside with a close f
amily member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent
resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry would
cause the foreign national undue hardship;
(E) the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual needing urgent medical
care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;
F) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government
(or is an eligible dependent of such an employee), and the foreign national can document that he or she h
as provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government; ／￣￣＼＿_,ト、Д/＿＿＿＿
／ /￣Yi. / jﾃ、 f￣ヨ
/ ／∧ / />>894 /.i l iー――‐u'￣
./ ／ Д｀ / / / / l l
i' ／ ｌ ヽ../ ﾚ' l l
. / _/ ＼ !、
lヽ＿＿＿_」 l
. !、/ ＼. ＼ ＼l ト./
ﾄ、＿_＼/ﾄ、/ﾄ、 y
l
l ￣( ）y ） /l i
l l Y>>895''/ー' / .l l
!、 l l./ / l l
/ / l/ ,/ i'
/_ ./l l｀ー‐〈 ﾄ.＿_」
L_｀`^yﾄ.＿」、ー" `ヽ＿」
`ー' `ヽ＿」
(iii) Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security
, any waiver issued by a consular officer as part of the visa adjudication process will
be effective both for the issuance of a visa and for any subsequent entry on that visa,
but will leave unchanged all other requirements for admission or entry.
>>896
(iv) Case-by-case waivers may not be granted categorically, but may be appropriate,
subject to the limitations, conditions, and requirements set forth under subsection (i)
of this subsection and the guidance issued under subsection (ii) of this subsection, in individual circumstances such as the following:
(A) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a
continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, is outside the United States
on the applicable effective date under section 7 of this proclamation, seeks to reenter
the United States to resume that activity, and the denial of reentry would impair that activity;
G) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designate
d under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting
meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA;
(H) the foreign national is a Canadian permanent resident who applies for a visa at a location within Canada;
(I) the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government-sponsored exchange visitor; or
(J) the foreign national is traveling to the United States, at the request of a United States Governmen
t department or agency, for legitimate law enforcement, foreign policy, or national security purposes. 15MAサポはバンドウォークのサインですよ！
後1時間でSは時間切れになります 月曜の上窓で稼いだからいいけどさ、
昨日からずっとこんな感じやねん
今日まだ２回しかポジってないねん 東山
奈稿日：2017/12/05(火) 01:37:46.15
＿＿＿＿
.／, - ､, - ､ ￣ ヽ
>>905
./-┤ ｡る哀れなハム
oclamation, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of St
ate, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate heads of agencies, shall submit a r|｡ |――-､ ヽ
| ヽ｀- ○- ´ ／ ヽ |
水伊 | -
| ― | |
| ´
| ｀ヽ . | |ヽ
＼_ _/-―――.| （
Ｔ ） ｀l Τ（ ）
￣ | ￣
} | ＼＿／
| ､--― ￣| >>906
/
良い優の野織さんの浴衣姿やエッチ姿で抜きまくって信者で基地
外ニート( ゜
∀゜)o彡゜ ◆NR
N/cAR
0PMwwwwwww>>900
Sec. 4. Adjustments to and Removal of Suspensions and Limitations. (a)
The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, devise a process
to assess whether any suspensions and limitations imposed by section 2 of this proclamation should be continued, t
erminated, modified, or supplemented. The process shall account for whether countries have improved their identity-
management and information-sharing protocols and procedures based on the criteria set forth in section 1 of this procl
amation and the Secretary of Homeland Security's report of September 15, 2017. Within 180 days of the date of this pr
eport with recommendations to the President, through appropriate Assistants to the President, regarding the following:
∩ 人｀､ _ | 央[なお
ぼう] 投 ＿.- ´ | .| ＼
| ⌒ヽ ／ ＼ ￣￣￣ ノノ ＼
1 |´ |￣―--ｖ歳して声
―― ´ヽ ＿ な衣装／⌒＼>>907
(i) the interests of the United States, if any, that continue to require the suspension of, or limitations on, the entry on c
ertain classes of nationals of countries identified in section 2 of this proclamation and whether the restrictions and limita
tioals of countries not identified in this proclamation. >>908
(b) The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney Gener
al, the Director of National Intelligence, and the head of any other executive department or agency (agency) that the Secretary of St
ate deems appropriate, shall engage the countries listed in section 2 of this proclamation, and any other countries that have inform
ation-sharing, identity-management, or risk-factor deficiencies as practicable, appropriate, and consistent with the foreign policy, nationa
l security, and public-safety objectives of the United States.>>902
(c) Notwithstanding the process described above, and consistent with the process described in section 2(f) of Executive Order 13780, if
the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence
, determines, at any time, that a country meets the standards of the baseline described in section 1(c) of this proclamation, that a country has a
n adequate plan to provide such information, or that one or more of the restrictions or limitations imposed on the entry of a country's nationals are
no longer necessary for the security or welfare of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security may recommend to the President the remov
al or modification of any or all such restrictions and limitations. The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, or the Attorney General やっぱり窓埋めない気だなこれ
完全に嵌め殺しにきてるよ
きったほうがいいぞロンガー >>927
わい先ほど619Ｌポジったとこや
2回もポジってるならええやないか まあ上も70を超えない限り安心できん（´・ω・`） これ、歪み(*´ω｀*)
siroto多い。(*´ω｀*)
ﾜﾛﾘﾝﾁﾞﾖ｡｡(*´ω｀*) 相撲協会のデブが税金払いもしないで高級車乗り回してるのっておかしくね 113いってええええ
俺の予言外れてくれぇぇえええ
こんかいは111.5までしかたえらんねぇんだよおおお
たすけてえ
助かったらしばらく為替休みます ＿＿＿_
／ ＼ ,, /＼
／ （●） （●） ブイモンキーしたじゃん。
／ :::::⌒（__人__）⌒::＼
| |_/ |
.＼ ／
/⌒～"￣,￣￣〆⌒,ﾆつ
| ,＿_＿ﾞ＿__､rヾｲｿ⊃
| ｀l￣
| .| >>932
窓埋めないなら切ったほうがいいのはショートでは？ .60-.70のレンジは後1回くらい続く時間帯やね ポジるの我慢してたのはえらいと思う。こんな値幅小さいレンジなら。 いつもの昇りが今日は13時からきてしまったらから
入るきっかけがつかめんな まあこういう日に無理せんことや 今夜113突破できるか
日足25ＭＡで叩かれて失速するか 分速で1pipsで100円とりゃ60分で6千円だぜ？？
負けなきゃええ話や まぁこの4時間足みてここでＳするアホもそうそういないだろうが >>963
スプレッドあるのにスキャというかめちゃくちゃ細かくとる人すごいと思います。
どうやってやってるんだろｗ >>936
>>948
普段俺がショーターだからロンガーと行ってしまった。すまん。
ショーターの間違いだ >>970
１分足レベルで一方通行は無いから逆いったらガッツリナンピン入れて
プラスになったら利確。その繰り返し。
国内ならスプレッドはあまり問題にならない。問題になるのは跳ねた時。 まぁここでの上値重いとかなんの関係もねえよ
メリケンが一発で突き破る 動き始めるのはユーロの指標18時前頃からじゃないの ただいまー
なんだまだ窓埋めてないのか？
サボってんじゃねえぞ >>981
俺の619Ｌ狩って見ろや！ストップ40だ 青山みたいなあるわけないだろみたいな極論持ち出すのも政治家には必要だわな
メタンハイドレードはあれやったけども 値幅なくてヤりたい放題だな。
全力Yだな。
Lは我慢
Sは勢いないからなぁ
こんな所ではいったらお祈りするしかなくなる。つかまったやつは逃げたいだろうけどたぶん逃がしてくれないだろう。 年末で色々物入りだったので、種銭おろして10枚くらいでポチポチやってるんだけど、ドル円全く面白くないなw
100枚くらいだとドーパミン出まくるんだが、これって病気かな？ 欧州タイムは欧州通貨いじった方がいいのかな？と思い始めて早2年 ヤクザ来てもこんな動きかあ
もうクリスマス休暇入りしてるんだなあ
ダメだね 最近グラマス仮想通貨板にいるのか
二兎を追うものは・・・いやなんでもない >>988
チャートで一発ヌケるよーになってからが一人前 >>986
あるわけないだろみたいな事が起こるから怖いんだよ
9.11とか地下鉄サリンとかさ ▲
／ﾆﾆﾆﾆ＼
/ ＿＿＿｀,
｜|・ω・|｜
｜[=ﾆﾆﾆﾆ=]｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
／｜＿＿＿＿｜＼
￣ ;,･:" ,:.･ ￣
Ｗ Ｗ
ＷＶＷ
⌒^ＷＷ ⌒ヽ
ヽ ,' ⌒ヽ!!-'⌒ヽ,
⌒ヽ ,..！！⌒ '"⌒
.) | | ⌒ ヾ
`);⌒'¨ ⌒ " ヾ
;･.´⌒ ⌒ ⌒ヾ
('⌒;⌒ ::⌒ ）
.(´ ） :: )
ドル円どこまであがるんやろーな？
ユロルは日足が悪しぎるから、相当調整必要 >>995
北から武装難民きてるから俺達も襲われるかもな空き巣には要注意だな このスレッドは１０００を超えました。
新しいスレッドを立ててください。
life time: 4時間 59分 9秒 5ちゃんねるの運営はプレミアム会員の皆さまに支えられています。
運営にご協力お願いいたします。
───────────────────
《プレミアム会員の主な特典》
★ 5ちゃんねる専用ブラウザからの広告除去
★ 5ちゃんねるの過去ログを取得
★ 書き込み規制の緩和
───────────────────
会員登録には個人情報は一切必要ありません。
月300円から匿名でご購入いただけます。
▼ プレミアム会員登録はこちら ▼
https://premium.5ch.net/
▼ 浪人ログインはこちら ▼
https://login.5ch.net/login.php レス数が1000を超えています。これ以上書き込みはできません。
